We can unlock anything you want except your cell.
.... and I don't mean your phone
Well that would reduce the world's population by about three people.henry quirk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 3:35 pm How about a world without pacifists?
Instead of eliminatin' violent men, let's just eliminate those who object to violent men, and violence in general.
There are far fewer pacifists than violent men: logically, gettin' rid of pacifists would be far easier.
HA!vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:35 pmWell that would reduce the world's population by about three people.henry quirk wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 3:35 pm How about a world without pacifists?
Instead of eliminatin' violent men, let's just eliminate those who object to violent men, and violence in general.
There are far fewer pacifists than violent men: logically, gettin' rid of pacifists would be far easier.
Will you PROVIDE ANY example of where you think or BELIEVE that I have NOT "connected small pieces of information together into a cogent whole"?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 3:16 pmBe that way then. Your inability to connect small pieces of information together into a cogent whole will never be fixed if you don't even try though.Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 2:32 pmOR, maybe I will just find MORE things that NEED CORRECTING and/or POINTING OUT.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 1:53 pm
Perhaps if you tried reading and understanding what we write before you tear the sentences apart and treat them as unrelated you would be less of a needy, obliviouos, ignorant, obnoxious cock end.
Also, I do NOT need to read a WHOLE POST, a WHOLE PAGE, nor a WHOLE THREAD to find what I consider False, Wrong, and Incorrect.
The words used, mostly speak for themselves, so it does NOT take long at all to find fault and flaws. As can be CLEARLY SHOWN in your sentence above here.
Okay.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 3:16 pmThat effort was lame. I don't need you to write material for me.
LOL
THANK YOU SO MUCH for your CORRECTION. I need all the help I can get.
YOU'RE WELCOME i.e. YOU ARE WELCOMEAge wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 1:14 amTHANK YOU SO MUCH for your CORRECTION. I need all the help I can get.
My APOLOGIES for, AGAIN, being INCORRECT.
Yes I did understand, when you CORRECTED me. That is WHY I apologized for, AGAIN, being INCORRECT.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 1:17 amYOU'RE WELCOME i.e. YOU ARE WELCOME
Pathetic. 'Your' and 'you're' have completely different meanings. If you use one in place of the other it makes you look like a moron and renders whatever you wrote meaningless. People who don't have a clue about grammar and punctuation always use the old 'but language is evolving' excuse The way it's used might change, but the rules don't. Do the rules of physics change because some people are incapable of understanding them? Or the rules of music? You have to understand the rules in the first place to be able to mess around with them.Age wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 1:36 amYes I did understand, when you CORRECTED me. That is WHY I apologized for, AGAIN, being INCORRECT.
Also, you could also NOTICE, once more, that I was, in that last sentence, AGAIN INCORRECT, from YOUR perspective of things.
But learning how to please EVERY one, ALL of the time, is a journey.
And, this partly explains WHY learning how to communicate correctly, or better, with 'you', human beings, can be a very lengthy process.
By the way, the reason WHY, if it has NOT YET been NOTICED, I do NOT use apostrophes to contract words, like 'you are', is because words, and their meanings, and thus language, itself, is ALWAYS EVOLVING and CHANGING. So, what is right and correct to some of 'you', human beings, in one day, is, or can become, wrong, incorrect, or just plain old 'out of date' to "others", in the same day, or in another day.
In other words, what is being written, in these days, when this is being written, can be LOOKED AT and SEEN DIFFERENTLY, in the days, in the "future".
I WAS GOING TO POINT THIS OUT and MAKE IT CLEAR. But I thought/ASSUMED, "there will be NO NEED TO because SURELY this person will NOT MAKE THIS MISTAKE of thinking that this "your" and "you're" I had NOT YET REALIZED and/or was 'trying to' "justify" in using the "your" word.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 2:00 amPathetic. 'Your' and 'you're' have completely different meanings.Age wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 1:36 amYes I did understand, when you CORRECTED me. That is WHY I apologized for, AGAIN, being INCORRECT.
Also, you could also NOTICE, once more, that I was, in that last sentence, AGAIN INCORRECT, from YOUR perspective of things.
But learning how to please EVERY one, ALL of the time, is a journey.
And, this partly explains WHY learning how to communicate correctly, or better, with 'you', human beings, can be a very lengthy process.
By the way, the reason WHY, if it has NOT YET been NOTICED, I do NOT use apostrophes to contract words, like 'you are', is because words, and their meanings, and thus language, itself, is ALWAYS EVOLVING and CHANGING. So, what is right and correct to some of 'you', human beings, in one day, is, or can become, wrong, incorrect, or just plain old 'out of date' to "others", in the same day, or in another day.
In other words, what is being written, in these days, when this is being written, can be LOOKED AT and SEEN DIFFERENTLY, in the days, in the "future".
I would NOT go as far as, "looks like a MORON", but I ADMITTED that what I wrote WAS INCORRECT, and WRONG, and even THANKED YOU for CORRECTING me. What else do you WANT from me?vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 2:00 am If you use one in place of the other it makes you look like a moron and renders whatever you wrote meaningless.
REALLY?vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 2:00 am People who don't have a clue about grammar and punctuation always use the old 'but language is evolving' excuse
Is there A RULE that one MUST write "YOU'RE" instead of 'YOU ARE'?vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 25, 2021 2:00 am The way it's used might change, but the rules don't. Do the rules of physics change because some people are incapable of understanding them? Or the rules of music? You have to understand the rules in the first place to be able to mess around with them.
You can barely piece together a cogent sentence, let alone multiple related sentences on any topic that doesn't simply devolve into a shapeless rant. My case proves itself, you will not repsond with a cogent post.Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 11:49 pmWill you PROVIDE ANY example of where you think or BELIEVE that I have NOT "connected small pieces of information together into a cogent whole"?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 3:16 pmBe that way then. Your inability to connect small pieces of information together into a cogent whole will never be fixed if you don't even try though.Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 2:32 pm
OR, maybe I will just find MORE things that NEED CORRECTING and/or POINTING OUT.
Also, I do NOT need to read a WHOLE POST, a WHOLE PAGE, nor a WHOLE THREAD to find what I consider False, Wrong, and Incorrect.
The words used, mostly speak for themselves, so it does NOT take long at all to find fault and flaws. As can be CLEARLY SHOWN in your sentence above here.