Already explained.
A World Without Men?
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 6520
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: A World Without Men?
You see how what yoo did there was ask one of your cLArIFYinG QUEstioNs even though the answer to it was the next line in his post?Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 1:13 pmAnd what purpose do you envision the penis and the testicles of some bodies were designed for, EXACTLY?Oakley wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 10:30 pmWomen's biological role is to have and nurture children, their bodies are designed for this purpose.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 6:59 pmYou need to demonstrate that violence is in some way a property of boys and not girls,
What are men's biological role, if NOT to have and nurture children?
LOL Okay.
You do that because you don't bother reading anyone's posts BEFORE "you" HiT tHat REPLy wITH QUote button.
That is part of the reason why you never have the slightest idea what is going on and always look like a coMPLeTe iDIOt.
Last edited by FlashDangerpants on Thu Jun 24, 2021 1:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: A World Without Men?
Televisions can ONLY show pictures from when cameras were invented. And, cameras have NOT been around for thousands of years NOR have been in EVERY time AND place.
Do you own a hairbrush?
Re: A World Without Men?
YES. I did NOTICE that, AFTER I read the next line.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 1:28 pmYou see how what yoo did there was ask one of your cLArIFYinG QUEstioNs even though the answer to it was the next line in his post?
And, do you want to KNOW the ACTUAL reason WHY I LEFT my CLARIFYING QUESTION there, or do you just want to ASSUME MORE things here?
Did you ACTUALLY MEAN that I "do not bother reading ALL of ANOTHER'S post BEFORE ..."?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 1:28 pm You do that because you don't bother reading anyone's posts BEFORE "you" HiT tHat REPLy wITH QUote button.
Also, are you TELLING ME THIS as though I did NOT ALREADY KNOW THIS, or for some other reason?
If it was for some other reason, then WHY are you TELLING me this?
If I ALWAYS LOOK LIKE a COMPLETE IDIOT, to you, then it would NOT matter what I did, then I would STILL ALWAYS LOOK LIKE a COMPLETE IDIOT, to you. Which, by the way, I care NOT one iota.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 1:28 pm That is part of the reason why you never have the slightest idea what is going on and always look like a coMPLeTe iDIOt.
The MORE of a COMPLETE IDIOT I LOOK LIKE to 'you', people, in the days when this is written, then the BETTER this WILL BE and IS for ALL of 'us', in the long run.
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 6520
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: A World Without Men?
Perhaps if you tried reading and understanding what we write before you tear the sentences apart and treat them as unrelated you would be less of a needy, obliviouos, ignorant, obnoxious cock end.
Egomaniacal jibber jabber.
Re: A World Without Men?
That ALL DEPENDS.
I have corrected what I said here.
Last edited by Age on Thu Jun 24, 2021 2:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: A World Without Men?
OR, maybe I will just find MORE things that NEED CORRECTING and/or POINTING OUT.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 1:53 pmPerhaps if you tried reading and understanding what we write before you tear the sentences apart and treat them as unrelated you would be less of a needy, obliviouos, ignorant, obnoxious cock end.
Also, I do NOT need to read a WHOLE POST, a WHOLE PAGE, nor a WHOLE THREAD to find what I consider False, Wrong, and Incorrect.
The words used, mostly speak for themselves, so it does NOT take long at all to find fault and flaws. As can be CLEARLY SHOWN in your sentence above here.
I was expecting more of comeback something like, "A world without 'me'", would be a MUCH BETTER PLACE.
Re: A World Without Men?
I think this AGREEMENT was found and REACHED when I wrote;
You appear to be NOT REALLY looking forward to ANY thought, which OPPOSES your view here, correct?
Re: A World Without Men?
Impenitent wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:47 pm in a world without men, would all the menstrual cycles mystically align and assure the sterile world will have at least 3 weeks of peace for the remaining few months of continued existence?
-Imp
Speaking of that, an ER doc I know unofficially mentioned that most of the back spasms he sees in men are caused by wives (and significant others), but he's a known kidder.
Speaking of that, it's a full moon right now and postings are abuzz.
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 6520
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: A World Without Men?
Be that way then. Your inability to connect small pieces of information together into a cogent whole will never be fixed if you don't even try though.Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 2:32 pmOR, maybe I will just find MORE things that NEED CORRECTING and/or POINTING OUT.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 1:53 pmPerhaps if you tried reading and understanding what we write before you tear the sentences apart and treat them as unrelated you would be less of a needy, obliviouos, ignorant, obnoxious cock end.
Also, I do NOT need to read a WHOLE POST, a WHOLE PAGE, nor a WHOLE THREAD to find what I consider False, Wrong, and Incorrect.
The words used, mostly speak for themselves, so it does NOT take long at all to find fault and flaws. As can be CLEARLY SHOWN in your sentence above here.
That effort was lame. I don't need you to write material for me.Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 2:32 pmI was expecting more of comeback something like, "A world without 'me'", would be a MUCH BETTER PLACE.