Age wrote: ↑Fri Dec 15, 2023 11:29 am
AND ONCE AGAIN 'this one' WILL NOT DO 'that' , which I COULD OF and WOULD OF, IF ASKED.
Yes, people are different from each other Ken.
WELL, OBVIOUSLY, IF you HAVE NO IDEA, AT ALL, and were Truly CURIOUS and WANTED TO LEARN, and KNOW, MORE, then you WOULD HAVE ASKED A CLARIFYING QUESTION. BUT, you OBVIOUSLY DID NOT.
of course, but I've already explained that I am not interested and why not.
'These adult ones', BACK THEN, REALLY HAD evolved INTO HAVING LOST JUST ABOUT ALL CURIOUSITY and JUST ABOUT ALL OF the 'WANTING TO LEARN and KNOW', AS WELL.
So, if I am not curious about your thoughts, Ken, then I am not curious. Really poor, fallacious logic, Ken. And, in addition, it's incorrect. So, poor reasoning - and very narcissistic reasoning, by the way - and in addition a false conclusion. Mentioning the latter because people can use false reasoning, sometimes, to reach correct conclusions, but you didn't have that luck this time.
ONCE AGAIN, IF you think or BELIEVE that you have NOT YET, FULLY, UNDERSTOOD or COMPREHENDED SOME 'thing:, which I have SAID or CLAIMED here, then feel ABSOLUTELY FREE TO JUST ASK me SOME CLARIFY QUESTIONS.
See above on why that is not happening. And then in other posts where I explained this in greater detail. Your explanations, and the 'mindread' reasons, for why are narcissistic.
OF COURSE I QUOTED and ACCUSED, 'you', people, OF 'things' that 'you' ACTUALLY DO.
The typography makes this gibberish.
BUT I READ, and WAS REFERRING TO, your 'seething' comment and remark here.
It's really ok.
Even here 'you' ARE Wrong and ABSOLUTELY. But 'you' OBVIOUSLY ARE NOT YET PREPARED FOR 'this Fact', NEITHER..
"Either" is the correct word to end that sentence with, given your intention, Ken. Then to the specific topic: If you don't respect your readers, well, you won't, Ken. It probably will make most people even warier of you. Or amused. Or both. The postive side of that is that I think either of those reactions is a good one. Since, they become the frame for your judgments of them.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2023 5:44 am
I've made that clear in a number of posts.
ONCE MORE the HABIT OF 'you' ALLUDING ONLY and NOT ACTUALLY CLARIFYING PREVAILS AGAIN here.
If I have already clarified, or actually, on my own explained, this and other things and you can't remember it and this happens repeatedly. Hence; I am not alluding, here, I am showing a lack of interest. If you have a strong interest, you'll go back and find them, given that it is not my responsibility to repeat myself to someone who is so in love with questions nearly everything elicits them, even when this person has been given the answers already.