How can Prophet Mohammed be compared to God’s Incarnation as Kalki?

[dattaswami]

It is perfectly correct. The establisher of every religion is God-in-human-form and hence, Kalki and Mohammed can be conveniently compared. At the time of Mohammad, there were several religions, which worshipped several Gods. As a result, there was a lot of quarrelling and violence among those religions in His region. Such violence does not subside through the peaceful preaching of spiritual knowledge. That violence can only be suppressed by counter-violence. Any brutal violence in society can only be controlled by using the police-force and not by giving peaceful advice. Similarly, Kalki takes a sword in the hand to control the violence caused by unjust people. But the aim of such violence is peace. Such violence used to bring peace is called ‘jihad’, which has now been misinterpreted to be terrorism.

The Quran says that one should preach the message of Allah after helping the other person. It further says that one should leave the person to think about the message in a free atmosphere, without any force. The wrong concepts developed and inserted later on by followers, are unnecessarily superimposed on the Human Incarnations, who originally established the various religions. The blind fascination of followers towards the old traditions in their religion should be rejected through perfect analysis. Traditions should be practiced only after they are found to be correct and beneficial through analysis. It is said that a person having a blind fascination for his own forefathers, will drink even the salty water from the well dug by his father. He will reject the available sweet and good drinking water (Kṣāraṃ jalaṃ kāpuruṣāḥ pibanti)!

[Iwannaplato]

It is perfectly correct. The establisher of every religion is God-in-human-form

That doesn't fit well with Islam, where Mohammed is considered a profet AND NOT God in human form. Further...all religions? They say different things? How many people must be followers of a set of religious beliefs for it to be considered a religion?

[DPMartin]

It is perfectly correct. The establisher of every religion is God-in-human-form and hence, Kalki and Mohammed can be conveniently compared. At the time of Mohammad, there were several religions, which worshipped several Gods. As a result, there was a lot of quarrelling and violence among those religions in His region. Such violence does not subside through the peaceful preaching of spiritual knowledge. That violence can only be suppressed by counter-violence. Any brutal violence in society can only be controlled by using the police-force and not by giving peaceful advice. Similarly, Kalki takes a sword in the hand to control the violence caused by unjust people. But the aim of such violence is peace. Such violence used to bring peace is called ‘jihad’, which has now been misinterpreted to be terrorism.

The Quran says that one should preach the message of Allah after helping the other person. It further says that one should leave the person to think about the message in a free atmosphere, without any force. The wrong concepts developed and inserted later on by followers, are unnecessarily superimposed on the Human Incarnations, who originally established the various religions. The blind fascination of followers towards the old traditions in their religion should be rejected through perfect analysis. Traditions should be practiced only after they are found to be correct and beneficial through analysis. It is said that a person having a blind fascination for his own forefathers, will drink even the salty water from the well dug by his father. He will reject the available sweet and good drinking water (Kṣāraṃ jalaṃ kāpuruṣāḥ pibanti)!

Mohammed is believed by his followers as the prophet of Islam, not a god or god in the flesh. Muslims pray to “Ala” not Mohammed. do some home work.

[Harbal]

It is said that a person having a blind fascination for his own forefathers, will drink even the salty water from the well dug by his father.

I don't doubt you when you say this is said, but I'm pretty sure no one has ever said it to me.

[Iwannaplato]

It is said that a person having a blind fascination for his own forefathers, will drink even the salty water from the well dug by his father.

I don't doubt you when you say this is said, but I'm pretty sure no one has ever said it to me.

You're hanging out with the wrong crowd.