I did not claim that directly.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2024 7:41 amCould you show us somewhere, from within the science-biology FSK where breathing is referred to in moral terms?Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 3:42 am
- 1. It is undeniable there is an "oughtness-to-breathe" within the science-biology FSRK [thus objective].
1. It is undeniable there is an "oughtness-to-breathe" within the science-biology FSRC
2. The "oughtness-to-breathe" is related to say, suicide [generally immoral] which is a moral element within a morality-proper FSRC.
3. A constituted FSRC within a collective of subjective is objective of varying degrees, i.e. intersubjective.
4. Since 2 and since 3, morality is objective in varying degrees in the above context.
The above is quite crude by valid.
The argument-proper I have is more refined and more convincing than the above.