So are you saying that it is not objectively the case that that which no greater than can be conceived of is the following:FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 10:39 pmIt's nonsense to claim that a normative evaluation such as "better" is the sort of thing that might qualify as an objective truth. I direct you to mister Hume for the explanation of this problem.Philosopher19 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:47 pm Better to be really good than imaginary good. This is objectively true by semantics/definition/reason.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is%E2%80%93ought_problem
A truly perfect existence. Objectively it's better for a truly perfect existence to be real than imaginary. Or can you find me a rational being that says no to this?
And if you say that it is not objectively the case, can you tell me what being with access to semantics and reason will non-contradictorily say "a really truly perfect existence is not that which no greater than can be conceived of"? That would be like saying "a triangle is not triangular".
Whatever you say is that which no greater than can be conceived of other than a truly perfect existence, will be better in a truly perfect existence. Again, a truly perfect existence is that which no greater than can be conceived of. This is not subjective opinion. This is a matter of pure reason. As in it is objectively the case that a truly perfect existence is that which no greater than can be conceived.