The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made

[Age]

I see it hit you hard that your "irrefutable truth" is probably just some mathemathically self-refuting delusion, always was. No one really expected some great new insight from you anyway, we didn't get our hopes up.

I see that it COMPLETELY and UTTERLY BAMBOOZLED 'you' here "atla", that 'you' could NOT even just SAY and WRITE a reply that made SENSE.

Also, the Fact that 'you' BELIEVED, and STILL BELIEVE, that ABSOLUTELY NO one, EVER, REALLY EXPECTED ABSOLUTELY ANY NEW INSIGHT FROM 'me' ANYWAY EXPLAINS A GREAT DEAL ABOUT WHY 'you' THINK, SPEAK, and REPLY 'the way' that 'you', OBVIOUSLY, DO here.

Spewing more bullshit I see

IF 'this' IS what 'you' SEE and ONLY what 'you' SEE, then let 'it' BE 'it'.

[Atla]

I see that it COMPLETELY and UTTERLY BAMBOOZLED 'you' here "atla", that 'you' could NOT even just SAY and WRITE a reply that made SENSE.

Also, the Fact that 'you' BELIEVED, and STILL BELIEVE, that ABSOLUTELY NO one, EVER, REALLY EXPECTED ABSOLUTELY ANY NEW INSIGHT FROM 'me' ANYWAY EXPLAINS A GREAT DEAL ABOUT WHY 'you' THINK, SPEAK, and REPLY 'the way' that 'you', OBVIOUSLY, DO here.

Spewing more bullshit I see

IF 'this' IS what 'you' SEE and ONLY what 'you' SEE, then let 'it' BE 'it'.

More bullshit

[Age]

Spewing more bullshit I see

IF 'this' IS what 'you' SEE and ONLY what 'you' SEE, then let 'it' BE 'it'.

More bullshit

AGAIN, if 'you' SAY and BELIEVE SO, then 'it' MUST BE SO.

[Atla]

IF 'this' IS what 'you' SEE and ONLY what 'you' SEE, then let 'it' BE 'it'.

More bullshit

AGAIN, if 'you' SAY and BELIEVE SO, then 'it' MUST BE SO.

More bullshit, after all it's all you have

[Age]

More bullshit

AGAIN, if 'you' SAY and BELIEVE SO, then 'it' MUST BE SO.

More bullshit, after all it's all you have

If 'this' is what 'you' ABSOLUTELY BELIEVE IS TRUE, then OKAY. 'We' GET 'it'.

[Atla]

AGAIN, if 'you' SAY and BELIEVE SO, then 'it' MUST BE SO.

More bullshit, after all it's all you have

If 'this' is what 'you' ABSOLUTELY BELIEVE IS TRUE, then OKAY. 'We' GET 'it'.

More bullshit

[Age]

More bullshit, after all it's all you have

If 'this' is what 'you' ABSOLUTELY BELIEVE IS TRUE, then OKAY. 'We' GET 'it'.

More bullshit

What 'we' can VERY CLEARLY SEE here is ANOTHER PRIME example of when one BELIEVES some 'thing' IS TRUE, then 'that' IS what 'they' WILL SEE, and/or even LOOK FOR, ONLY.

[Sculptor]

Obviously beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
So is good and evil (note for Bahman).

Beauty happens in the brain, like colour is not "Out There".

[Atla]

If 'this' is what 'you' ABSOLUTELY BELIEVE IS TRUE, then OKAY. 'We' GET 'it'.

More bullshit

What 'we' can VERY CLEARLY SEE here is ANOTHER PRIME example of when one BELIEVES some 'thing' IS TRUE, then 'that' IS what 'they' WILL SEE, and/or even LOOK FOR, ONLY.

More bullshit

[Age]

More bullshit

What 'we' can VERY CLEARLY SEE here is ANOTHER PRIME example of when one BELIEVES some 'thing' IS TRUE, then 'that' IS what 'they' WILL SEE, and/or even LOOK FOR, ONLY.

More bullshit

ONCE MORE, here IS FURTHER PROOF that 'this one' IS ONLY LOOKING FOR so-called 'bullshit' here, and IS ONLY SEEING so-called 'bullshit' here.

But, IF I EVER ASKED 'this one' to PROVIDE PROOF OF WHERE, EXACTLY, is the so-called 'bullshit' here, then what 'it' WOULD DO IS NEVER PROVIDE ABSOLUTELY ANY. MOSTLY BECAUSE there IS ABSOLUTELY NONE, well NONE FROM 'me' anyway.

As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVED True above here.

[Atla]

What 'we' can VERY CLEARLY SEE here is ANOTHER PRIME example of when one BELIEVES some 'thing' IS TRUE, then 'that' IS what 'they' WILL SEE, and/or even LOOK FOR, ONLY.

More bullshit

ONCE MORE, here IS FURTHER PROOF that 'this one' IS ONLY LOOKING FOR so-called 'bullshit' here, and IS ONLY SEEING so-called 'bullshit' here.

But, IF I EVER ASKED 'this one' to PROVIDE PROOF OF WHERE, EXACTLY, is the so-called 'bullshit' here, then what 'it' WOULD DO IS NEVER PROVIDE ABSOLUTELY ANY. MOSTLY BECAUSE there IS ABSOLUTELY NONE, well NONE FROM 'me' anyway.

As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVED True above here.

More and more bullshit.. looks like a positive feedback loop?

[Age]

More bullshit

ONCE MORE, here IS FURTHER PROOF that 'this one' IS ONLY LOOKING FOR so-called 'bullshit' here, and IS ONLY SEEING so-called 'bullshit' here.

But, IF I EVER ASKED 'this one' to PROVIDE PROOF OF WHERE, EXACTLY, is the so-called 'bullshit' here, then what 'it' WOULD DO IS NEVER PROVIDE ABSOLUTELY ANY. MOSTLY BECAUSE there IS ABSOLUTELY NONE, well NONE FROM 'me' anyway.

As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVED True above here.

More and more bullshit.. looks like a positive feedback loop?

And what 'we' have here IS ANOTHER PRIME example, AND ACTUAL IRREFUTABLE PROOF, OF 'confirmation bias' AT 'its' BEST.

'This one' here, ONCE AGAIN, IS PROVING ABSOLUTELY True what I SAY and CLAIM ABOUT the brain, and how 'it' WORKED, in PREVENTING and STOPPING 'those human beings, BACK THEN, in those 'OLDEN DAYS' FROM COMING-TO, FINDING, and SEEING the ACTUAL Truth of 'things'.

'This one' IS ACTUALLY PROVING how 'it' could NOT 'focus' on ABSOLUTELY ANY 'thing', OTHER THAN JUST BEING ABLE SEE so-called 'bullshit', ONLY, IN absolutely EVERY 'thing' I SAY and WRITE here.

[Atla]

.

[Atla]

...

Check this out (it took some experimenting):

NOW, WHAT 'we' POSSESS MANIFESTS ANOTHER EXEMPLARY INSTANCE, UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE OF 'affirmation prejudice'. 'This one', ONCE MORE, SUBSTANTIATES UNCONDITIONALLY What I ASSERT and DECLARE REGARDING the mind, 'its' ZENITH OPERATED, HINDERING and HALTING 'those individuals IN TIMES GONE BY'. IN those 'ANCIENT ERAS', FROM ARRIVING-AT, DISCOVERING, PERCEIVING the REAL Veracity of 'things'. GENUINELY VALIDATING 'this one', 'it' was INCAPABLE OF 'concentrating' on UNDOUBTEDLY ANY 'entity'. OTHER THAN MERELY BEING CAPABLE OBSERVE so-called 'nonsense'. ONLY, IN EVERY 'entity' I EXPRESS RECORD herein.

[Age]

...

Check this out (it took some experimenting):

NOW, WHAT 'we' POSSESS MANIFESTS ANOTHER EXEMPLARY INSTANCE, UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE OF 'affirmation prejudice'. 'This one', ONCE MORE, SUBSTANTIATES UNCONDITIONALLY What I ASSERT and DECLARE REGARDING the mind,

But have 'you' even ASSERTED and DECLARED ANY 'thing' REGARDING the 'mind' YET?

If yes, then WHERE and WHEN, EXACTLY?

I, for one, AM VERY INTERESTED IN SEEING and READING what 'you' have to SAY and WRITE REGARDING the 'mind'.

Maybe 'you' could START by INFORMING 'us' here if what the 'mind', TO 'you' IS, EXACTLY. That is; IF 'you' have NOTHING TO FEAR here, and 'you' ARE CONFIDENT IN what 'you' have to ASSERT and DECLARE REGARDING the 'mind'.

'its' ZENITH OPERATED, HINDERING and HALTING 'those individuals IN TIMES GONE BY'. IN those 'ANCIENT ERAS', FROM ARRIVING-AT, DISCOVERING, PERCEIVING the REAL Veracity of 'things'. GENUINELY VALIDATING 'this one', 'it' was INCAPABLE OF 'concentrating' on UNDOUBTEDLY ANY 'entity'. OTHER THAN MERELY BEING CAPABLE OBSERVE so-called 'nonsense'. ONLY, IN EVERY 'entity' I EXPRESS RECORD herein.

What IS the 'mind's' 'zenith operated', EXACTLY?

'you' have made some apparently very weird and wild CLAIMS here "atla", now are 'you' able to back up and support 'them'?

If yes, then GREAT, but will 'you' back up and support 'them' here in this thread?

If no, then WHY NOT?

By the way, what 'you' have SAID and WRITTEN here I do NOT, YET, agree with, as what 'you' SAID and WROTE is CERTAINLY NOT some 'thing' that I would SAY and WRITE.