What's the Difference if any between Man and Woman?

[Age]

There seems to be no depth to hypocrisy and pettiness. So when it comes to real virtue and vice, perverts and pedophiles waving their genitals in front of children in public, even that is not enough to put aside neighborhood feuds and personal grudges, in order to 'better' society.

Apathy is the sign of a dying civilization.

Apathy is the sign that nature is just doing what nature does.

If humans have a problem with what nature does, then humans should stop planting more children on the earth to be exposed to what nature does without reason, purpose, intent, or concern for us and our children.

What about INSTEAD of NOT doing the MOST NATURAL 'thing' of reproducing, 'you', adult human beings, just STOP 'TEACHING' the UNNATURAL or DISTORTED False and Wrong views and BELIEFS, which 'you' were TAUGHT, and have LEARNED, as being though they are true AND right?

We cannot change the human behavior of others, we can only change our own behavior, and live by those values and standards.

So, ONCE AGAIN, WHEN 'you', adult human beings, BECOME Truly Honest, and thus OPEN, while SERIOUSLY Wanting to CHANGE, for the better, then 'you' CAN and WILL CHANGE those Wrong behaviors of YOURS, which, IN TURN, children can NOT then COPY nor FOLLOW.

No good blaming and shaming others their prerogative to live as they behave according to their own values and standards.

True. It is UP TO 'you', adult human beings, to WANT TO CHANGE "your" 'selves' BECAUSE 'you' WANT TO, and NOT because "others" WANT 'you' to.

[Dontaskme]

What about INSTEAD of NOT doing the MOST NATURAL 'thing' of reproducing, 'you', adult human beings, just STOP 'TEACHING' the UNNATURAL or DISTORTED False and Wrong views and BELIEFS, which 'you' were TAUGHT, and have LEARNED, as being though they are true AND right?

There is always a harm in coming into existence, any horror and awful can happen to anyone at any moment, and the universe does not care one iota as to what you believe or not believe about your existence here. Or of what view you decide to take on it. So you AGE are not teaching me anything that I have not already discovered and learnt all by myself through my own direct experience.

[Dontaskme]

Yeah let's just kill ourselves because we have problems... you're being overly-dramatic here, Dontaskme.

You are projecting, that over used cliché you accuse others of doing.

Humans love problems, if they didn't they would be throughly bored senseless with their lives, they love to cause problems, anything to distract them away from the empty void of nothingness, that is their true being. If they haven't got a problem, they will surely invent one.

I'm not suggesting killing ourselves. As we're already here, so what's the point in causing more problems by killing ourselves. We're here now, might as well just deal with being alive until nature takes us out when it's our time to die. I'm just saying don't add more problems by making more people to come and deal with the problems we have existing. Really,we do not need to add more fuel to the fire. But then if we do continue procreating then we only have ourselves to blame, when we could have avoided the blame game. We seek fame in wanting our bloodline to continue, well carry on then and quit complaining.

[Age]

What about INSTEAD of NOT doing the MOST NATURAL 'thing' of reproducing, 'you', adult human beings, just STOP 'TEACHING' the UNNATURAL or DISTORTED False and Wrong views and BELIEFS, which 'you' were TAUGHT, and have LEARNED, as being though they are true AND right?

There is always a harm in coming into existence,

Since, ABSOLUTELY EVERY 'thing' IS 'relative' to 'the observer'. If one wants to SEE there IS ALWAYS 'a harm', then so be it. 'you', the observer, ARE ABSOLUTELY FREE to LOOK AT and SEE 'things' ABSOLUTELY ANY WAY you WANT TO.

any horror and awful can happen to anyone at any moment, and the universe does not care one iota as to what you believe or not believe about your existence here.

This is SO True. The Universe does NOT care one iota as to what you BELIEVE or DISBELIEVE about your existence here. For example, if you WANT TO BELIEVE that THERE IS ALWAYS A 'harm' in 'you' BEING HERE, then 'you' ARE ABSOLUTELY FREE TO DO SO. AND, 'we' do NOT care ONE IOTA.

Or of what view you decide to take on it. So you AGE are not teaching me anything that I have not already discovered and learnt all by myself through my own direct experience.

I was NOT MEANT TO, NOR even TRYING TO.

I just ASKED you A(NOTHER) CLARIFYING QUESTION.

Which 'we' are, OBVIOUSLY, STILL WAITING FOR 'you' TO ANSWER.

BUT, 'we' are in NO HURRY. So, there IS NO RUSH.

[Age]

Yeah let's just kill ourselves because we have problems... you're being overly-dramatic here, Dontaskme.

You are projecting, that over used cliché you accuse others of doing.

Humans love problems, if they didn't they would be throughly bored senseless with their lives, they love to cause problems, anything to distract them away from the empty void of nothingness, that is their true being. If they haven't got a problem, they will surely invent one.

If ONLY 'these people', back then, KNEW what the 'problem' word ACTUALLY MEANT and ACTUALLY REFERRED TO, EXACTLY. Then 'they' TOO would ALSO SEE just how ABSOLUTELY HILARIOUS, and how ABSOLUTELY True, 'this' REALLY IS, AS WELL.

I'm not suggesting killing ourselves. As we're already here, so what's the point in causing more problems by killing ourselves. We're here now, might as well just deal with being alive until nature takes us out when it's our time to die. I'm just saying don't add more problems by making more people to come and deal with the problems we have existing. Really,we do not need to add more fuel to the fire. But then if we do continue procreating then we only have ourselves to blame, when we could have avoided the blame game.

BUT 'Life' and 'living' IS Truly SIMPLE and EASY. Which is, obviously, CONTRARY TO the 'POPULAR BELIEF' of the day, when this was being written.

We seek fame in wanting our bloodline to continue, well carry on then and quit complaining.

So, the VERY REASON WHY "dontaskme" CREATED children was TO SEEK FAME.

[Dontaskme]

If 'you', adult human beings, did NOT have NOR do 'these things' upon "others", especially children, then there would NOT be following generations growing up to SCARED and AFRAID to be Truly OPEN and Honest. There, literally, would be NO need AT ALL for what is called 'privacy'.

It's interesting that children do not seem to fear being watched. Like when they are having their dirty bums wiped or when they are shitting or peeing in front of their parents. Or having chocolate and icecream smeared all around their face, they have no idea what a mess they look. Children do not seem to have inhibitions.

Children do not seem to fear not being loved or liked by their parents, their parents are the ones that usually adore them no matter what they do, it's like an unconditional love. It seems children just lap up all the attention that comes their way given usually by their parents.

So what happens, to those fearless children as they turn into self-conscious privacy loving adults? where has the fearless child gone?

.

[Dontaskme]

So, the VERY REASON WHY "dontaskme" CREATED children was TO SEEK FAME.

Yes, I had my children to seek fame, the deliberate creation that my sense of identity would carry on after my death as and through these other human beings.

[Dontaskme]

BUT 'Life' and 'living' IS Truly SIMPLE and EASY.

It's also very hard to live in the sense it can be extremely painful and utterly difficult to endure, even though endurance wins through, until the end.

[Agent Smith]

You must visit more websites ... there should be at least 10 million ta my reckoning.

The truth is out there ...

[Dontaskme]

You must visit more websites ... there should be at least 10 million ta my reckoning.

The truth is out there ...

And you are out there with the truth every minute of your life, where else is there but here?

[vegetariantaxidermy]

I think he lumped me in there too.

...that might have been because you made a ridiculous argument excluding "ordinary gays" from these larger perils.

...as-if sodomy is 'equal to' what Maia described.

You are such a moron. This isn't about 'gay' or 'straight' but it's a fact that many of these predatory 'fauxwomen' are straight men who claim to be lesbians-- It's a particularly common fantasy among porn-soaked straight males (gee, I wonder why...) There was a case recently in Australian where a 'lesbianman' sued a lesbian dating site for excluding him. Another case in the US where a 'lesbianman' sued (AND WON against)a women's spa, because he felt 'humilaited' at not being allowed to romp naked with 'other women'. There are also new cases coming up all the time of 'malelesbians' raping women in women's prisons. I'm not interested in your relgioturd hatred for gay men. This is about safety and protecting women and children from MEN who wish them harm.

[Trajk Logik]

I think he lumped me in there too.

...that might have been because you made a ridiculous argument excluding "ordinary gays" from these larger perils.

...as-if sodomy is 'equal to' what Maia described.

You are such a moron. This isn't about 'gay' or 'straight' but it's a fact that many of these predatory 'fauxwomen' are straight men who claim to be lesbians-- It's a particularly common fantasy among porn-soaked straight males (gee, I wonder why...) There was a case recently in Australian where a 'lesbianman' sued a lesbian dating site for excluding him. Another case in the US where a 'lesbianman' sued (AND WON against)a women's spa, because he felt 'humilaited' at not being allowed to romp naked with 'other women'. There are also new cases coming up all the time of 'malelesbians' raping women in women's prisons. I'm not interested in your relgioturd hatred for gay men. This is about safety and protecting women and children from MEN who wish them harm.

Most transgenders are gay men and the video you posted in the other thread included a lot of gay men, and I think you will find it difficult to find any reasonable "wokie" that advocates predatory males taking advantage of a situation of poor gay men that just want to be women. No "wokie" I've spoken to thinks it's okay for predatory males to pose and women to get into women's bathrooms and sports. And trans are included in the lesbian/gay group, not in the criminal group. It's gays that are expecting you to give up your rights to free speech, not predatory males. The latter aren't concerned with pronouns. They are concerned with invading women's safe spaces. So I would think it obvious that this IS about gay vs. straight, not just predatory males, but you are just needing to jump on the bandwagon to bash Wiz it appears.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

...that might have been because you made a ridiculous argument excluding "ordinary gays" from these larger perils.

...as-if sodomy is 'equal to' what Maia described.

You are such a moron. This isn't about 'gay' or 'straight' but it's a fact that many of these predatory 'fauxwomen' are straight men who claim to be lesbians-- It's a particularly common fantasy among porn-soaked straight males (gee, I wonder why...) There was a case recently in Australian where a 'lesbianman' sued a lesbian dating site for excluding him. Another case in the US where a 'lesbianman' sued (AND WON against)a women's spa, because he felt 'humilaited' at not being allowed to romp naked with 'other women'. There are also new cases coming up all the time of 'malelesbians' raping women in women's prisons. I'm not interested in your relgioturd hatred for gay men. This is about safety and protecting women and children from MEN who wish them harm.

Most transgenders are gay men and the video you posted in the other thread included a lot of gay men, and I think you will find it difficult to find any reasonable "wokie" that advocates predatory males taking advantage of a situation of poor gay men that just want to be women. No "wokie" I've spoken to thinks it's okay for predatory males to pose and women to get into women's bathrooms and sports. And trans are included in the lesbian/gay group, not in the criminal group. It's gays that are expecting you to give up your rights to free speech, not predatory males. The latter aren't concerned with pronouns. They are concerned with invading women's safe spaces. So I would think it obvious that this IS about gay vs. straight but you are just needing to jump on the bandwagon to bash Wiz.

It doesn't matter if 'most are gay men' if that's even true. That's not what this is about. It's about keeping men out of women-only spaces. How hard is that for people to understand? If men are being legally allowed to call themselves women, no questions asked (as it is here), then that leaves the door open for ANY man to gain access to ANYTHING that is women-only. If women aren't even ALLOWED to call men men, then where the fuck does that leave women?

[Trajk Logik]

Let the record show, that Wokies are too cowardly to remark the hypothetical differences between men and women.

Why have women's sports???

Because without a separate category of women's sports, even though women make up 51% of the population, they would make up only about 11% of winners in sports, thereby moving us backwards in the representation of women in sports.

[Trajk Logik]

You are such a moron. This isn't about 'gay' or 'straight' but it's a fact that many of these predatory 'fauxwomen' are straight men who claim to be lesbians-- It's a particularly common fantasy among porn-soaked straight males (gee, I wonder why...) There was a case recently in Australian where a 'lesbianman' sued a lesbian dating site for excluding him. Another case in the US where a 'lesbianman' sued (AND WON against)a women's spa, because he felt 'humilaited' at not being allowed to romp naked with 'other women'. There are also new cases coming up all the time of 'malelesbians' raping women in women's prisons. I'm not interested in your relgioturd hatred for gay men. This is about safety and protecting women and children from MEN who wish them harm.

Most transgenders are gay men and the video you posted in the other thread included a lot of gay men, and I think you will find it difficult to find any reasonable "wokie" that advocates predatory males taking advantage of a situation of poor gay men that just want to be women. No "wokie" I've spoken to thinks it's okay for predatory males to pose and women to get into women's bathrooms and sports. And trans are included in the lesbian/gay group, not in the criminal group. It's gays that are expecting you to give up your rights to free speech, not predatory males. The latter aren't concerned with pronouns. They are concerned with invading women's safe spaces. So I would think it obvious that this IS about gay vs. straight but you are just needing to jump on the bandwagon to bash Wiz.

It doesn't matter if 'most are gay men' if that's even true. That's not what this is about. It's about keeping men out of women-only spaces. How hard is that for people to understand? If men are being legally allowed to call themselves women, no questions asked (as it is here), then that leaves the door open for ANY man to gain access to ANYTHING that is women-only. If women aren't even ALLOWED to call men men, then where the fuck does that leave women?

You don't see how the infringement on free speech is the basis for the problem you are talking about? In canceling your right to use whatever pronoun you wish, they are effectively canceling your ability to question anyone's claim they are a woman or a man. If you want to solve the problem of predatory men in women's bathrooms you have to solve the problem of pronouns first.