If it is of no concern then you would not have responded. Face it age you are not convincing and clarifying others of anything.Age wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 10:49 pmBut 'you', "eodnhoj7", were NOT included in that 'we' here. OBVIOUSLY, 'you' have, ONCE AGAIN, gone completely OFF TRACK here.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 8:03 pmDon't speak of 'us' by using the term 'we'. I find your conversation pointless.Age wrote: ↑Sat Apr 22, 2023 9:06 am
LOL
LOL
LOL
I have NEVER NOT UNDERSTOOD that 1 equals a thing and 0 equals nothing.
WHY did you EVEN BEGIN TO ASSUME that what I ACTUALLY SAID and WROTE here referred to those two numbers?
MAYBE IF you GO BACK and START AGAIN you MIGHT SEE and UNDERSTAND WHERE and WHY you GOT SO FAR OFF TRACK.
We WILL WAIT, TO SEE.
AGAIN, when I used the 'number' word I was NOT referring to YOUR USE of just 1 and 0. Do you NOW COMPREHEND?
AND, 'we', meaning "others" BESIDES 'you', WILL WAIT, to SEE, if you do GO BACK and RE-READ what was written here AND do come to COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND WHERE and WHY you GOT SO FAR OFF TRACK.
What you FIND or DO NOT FIND 'pointless' is of NO REAL CONCERN here.
The Contradiction of the Point
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
1. I NEVER SAID that 'it' was of no concern.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 8:06 pmIf it is of no concern then you would not have responded. Face it age you are not convincing and clarifying others of anything.Age wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 10:49 pmBut 'you', "eodnhoj7", were NOT included in that 'we' here. OBVIOUSLY, 'you' have, ONCE AGAIN, gone completely OFF TRACK here.
AGAIN, when I used the 'number' word I was NOT referring to YOUR USE of just 1 and 0. Do you NOW COMPREHEND?
AND, 'we', meaning "others" BESIDES 'you', WILL WAIT, to SEE, if you do GO BACK and RE-READ what was written here AND do come to COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND WHERE and WHY you GOT SO FAR OFF TRACK.
What you FIND or DO NOT FIND 'pointless' is of NO REAL CONCERN here.
These people, back then, were SO BLINDED by their ALREADY GAINED ASSUMPTIONS and ALREADY OBTAINED BELIEFS that they, LITERALLY, could NOT SEE NOR COMPREHEND the ACTUAL words that I SAY and WRITE here, even though I go out of my way to highlight and emphasize SOME words for 'them' with capital letters.
2. I will say 'this' ONCE MORE, I am NOT here to 'convince' ANY one of ANY 'thing'. ALSO, I WILL 'clarify' absolutely ANY or EVERY 'thing' to absolutely ANY one who IS Truly INTERESTED in G.U.T.O.E. as 'it', Itself, illustrates and thus provides an absolutely Accurate and PERFECTLY CRYSTAL CLEAR PICTURE of the ACTUAL Truth of 'things', which 'so far' NO one has refuted.
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
1. "What you FIND or DO NOT FIND 'pointless' is of NO REAL CONCERN here.Age wrote: ↑Thu May 04, 2023 1:23 am1. I NEVER SAID that 'it' was of no concern.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 8:06 pmIf it is of no concern then you would not have responded. Face it age you are not convincing and clarifying others of anything.Age wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 10:49 pm
But 'you', "eodnhoj7", were NOT included in that 'we' here. OBVIOUSLY, 'you' have, ONCE AGAIN, gone completely OFF TRACK here.
AGAIN, when I used the 'number' word I was NOT referring to YOUR USE of just 1 and 0. Do you NOW COMPREHEND?
AND, 'we', meaning "others" BESIDES 'you', WILL WAIT, to SEE, if you do GO BACK and RE-READ what was written here AND do come to COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND WHERE and WHY you GOT SO FAR OFF TRACK.
What you FIND or DO NOT FIND 'pointless' is of NO REAL CONCERN here.
These people, back then, were SO BLINDED by their ALREADY GAINED ASSUMPTIONS and ALREADY OBTAINED BELIEFS that they, LITERALLY, could NOT SEE NOR COMPREHEND the ACTUAL words that I SAY and WRITE here, even though I go out of my way to highlight and emphasize SOME words for 'them' with capital letters.
2. I will say 'this' ONCE MORE, I am NOT here to 'convince' ANY one of ANY 'thing'. ALSO, I WILL 'clarify' absolutely ANY or EVERY 'thing' to absolutely ANY one who IS Truly INTERESTED in G.U.T.O.E. as 'it', Itself, illustrates and thus provides an absolutely Accurate and PERFECTLY CRYSTAL CLEAR PICTURE of the ACTUAL Truth of 'things', which 'so far' NO one has refuted.
2. The actual truth of things is that if something is a thing it is relative as it must connect and/or contrast to something else if it is to have identity. As relative it is true under some circumstances and false under others. Looking at the totality of circumstances a thing is simultaneously true and false thus is absurd. A thing is a contradiction as it must stand apart from something else if it is to have an individual identity.
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
YES, 'this' IS, EXACTLY, what I POINTED OUT, TO you.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri May 05, 2023 8:07 pm1. "What you FIND or DO NOT FIND 'pointless' is of NO REAL CONCERN here.Age wrote: ↑Thu May 04, 2023 1:23 am1. I NEVER SAID that 'it' was of no concern.
These people, back then, were SO BLINDED by their ALREADY GAINED ASSUMPTIONS and ALREADY OBTAINED BELIEFS that they, LITERALLY, could NOT SEE NOR COMPREHEND the ACTUAL words that I SAY and WRITE here, even though I go out of my way to highlight and emphasize SOME words for 'them' with capital letters.
2. I will say 'this' ONCE MORE, I am NOT here to 'convince' ANY one of ANY 'thing'. ALSO, I WILL 'clarify' absolutely ANY or EVERY 'thing' to absolutely ANY one who IS Truly INTERESTED in G.U.T.O.E. as 'it', Itself, illustrates and thus provides an absolutely Accurate and PERFECTLY CRYSTAL CLEAR PICTURE of the ACTUAL Truth of 'things', which 'so far' NO one has refuted.
LOL This is HOW ABSOLUTELY CLOSED 'you' REALLY ARE here "eodnhoj7".
If you EVER BECOME INTERESTED in LEARNING, and/or DISCOVERING, MORE or ANEW, then just let me KNOW, and I WILL HELP you.
If 'this' is what you WANT to BELIEVE is true, then, by ALL MEANS, please CARRY ON TO CONTINUE.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri May 05, 2023 8:07 pm As relative it is true under some circumstances and false under others. Looking at the totality of circumstances a thing is simultaneously true and false thus is absurd. A thing is a contradiction as it must stand apart from something else if it is to have an individual identity.
And, PLEASE do NOT let absolutely ANY 'thing' I SAY or SHOW do otherwise.
- Agent Smith
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
PeteOlcott's analogy is apt ... something about a baker not being able to make cake with red bricks ... not the baker's fault, obviously.
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
And yet you can make a cake with red bricks...red bricks are cakes of clay.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 2:11 am PeteOlcott's analogy is apt ... something about a baker not being able to make cake with red bricks ... not the baker's fault, obviously.
- Agent Smith
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
Nice! I hope PeteOlcott responds appropriately.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2023 7:13 pmAnd yet you can make a cake with red bricks...red bricks are cakes of clay.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 2:11 am PeteOlcott's analogy is apt ... something about a baker not being able to make cake with red bricks ... not the baker's fault, obviously.
- Agent Smith
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
Now I know what all this is about - something that's in itself a point + the classical royal pai in the arse. Can you believe our luck!?
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
If you EVER BECOME INTERESTED in LEARNING, and/or DISCOVERING, MORE or ANEW, then just let me KNOW, and I WILL HELP you.Age wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 1:29 amYES, 'this' IS, EXACTLY, what I POINTED OUT, TO you.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri May 05, 2023 8:07 pm1. "What you FIND or DO NOT FIND 'pointless' is of NO REAL CONCERN here.Age wrote: ↑Thu May 04, 2023 1:23 am
1. I NEVER SAID that 'it' was of no concern.
These people, back then, were SO BLINDED by their ALREADY GAINED ASSUMPTIONS and ALREADY OBTAINED BELIEFS that they, LITERALLY, could NOT SEE NOR COMPREHEND the ACTUAL words that I SAY and WRITE here, even though I go out of my way to highlight and emphasize SOME words for 'them' with capital letters.
2. I will say 'this' ONCE MORE, I am NOT here to 'convince' ANY one of ANY 'thing'. ALSO, I WILL 'clarify' absolutely ANY or EVERY 'thing' to absolutely ANY one who IS Truly INTERESTED in G.U.T.O.E. as 'it', Itself, illustrates and thus provides an absolutely Accurate and PERFECTLY CRYSTAL CLEAR PICTURE of the ACTUAL Truth of 'things', which 'so far' NO one has refuted.LOL This is HOW ABSOLUTELY CLOSED 'you' REALLY ARE here "eodnhoj7".
If you EVER BECOME INTERESTED in LEARNING, and/or DISCOVERING, MORE or ANEW, then just let me KNOW, and I WILL HELP you.
If 'this' is what you WANT to BELIEVE is true, then, by ALL MEANS, please CARRY ON TO CONTINUE.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri May 05, 2023 8:07 pm As relative it is true under some circumstances and false under others. Looking at the totality of circumstances a thing is simultaneously true and false thus is absurd. A thing is a contradiction as it must stand apart from something else if it is to have an individual identity.
And, PLEASE do NOT let absolutely ANY 'thing' I SAY or SHOW do otherwise.
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
Okay, I will NOW.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 02, 2023 8:49 pmIf you EVER BECOME INTERESTED in LEARNING, and/or DISCOVERING, MORE or ANEW, then just let me KNOW, and I WILL HELP you.Age wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 1:29 amYES, 'this' IS, EXACTLY, what I POINTED OUT, TO you.LOL This is HOW ABSOLUTELY CLOSED 'you' REALLY ARE here "eodnhoj7".
If you EVER BECOME INTERESTED in LEARNING, and/or DISCOVERING, MORE or ANEW, then just let me KNOW, and I WILL HELP you.
If 'this' is what you WANT to BELIEVE is true, then, by ALL MEANS, please CARRY ON TO CONTINUE.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri May 05, 2023 8:07 pm As relative it is true under some circumstances and false under others. Looking at the totality of circumstances a thing is simultaneously true and false thus is absurd. A thing is a contradiction as it must stand apart from something else if it is to have an individual identity.
And, PLEASE do NOT let absolutely ANY 'thing' I SAY or SHOW do otherwise.
your turn.
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
If a line is a division of a point, thus resulting in infinite points between said divided point, then the point is self divided, as it only results in itself when divided, thus it is a contradiction.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2023 3:57 amOkay, I will NOW.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 02, 2023 8:49 pmIf you EVER BECOME INTERESTED in LEARNING, and/or DISCOVERING, MORE or ANEW, then just let me KNOW, and I WILL HELP you.Age wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 1:29 am
YES, 'this' IS, EXACTLY, what I POINTED OUT, TO you.
LOL This is HOW ABSOLUTELY CLOSED 'you' REALLY ARE here "eodnhoj7".
If you EVER BECOME INTERESTED in LEARNING, and/or DISCOVERING, MORE or ANEW, then just let me KNOW, and I WILL HELP you.
If 'this' is what you WANT to BELIEVE is true, then, by ALL MEANS, please CARRY ON TO CONTINUE.
And, PLEASE do NOT let absolutely ANY 'thing' I SAY or SHOW do otherwise.
your turn.
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
Okay.
Now that I have learned that you BELIEVE the above here is true, what happens?
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
Does it matter if it is a contradiction?Age wrote: ↑Mon Jun 05, 2023 11:35 amOkay.
Now that I have learned that you BELIEVE the above here is true, what happens?
What happens with your knowledge?