But 'you', "attofishpi", can do it ALWAYS, correct?attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Mar 18, 2023 1:03 pmNo. You unfortunately cannot distinguish serious talk from a satirical quip.Age wrote: ↑Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:40 pmWHY WHEN I QUESTION or CHALLENGE you, and you are NOT ABLE TO RESPOND to the ACTUAL QUESTION/CHALLENGE, you RESORT to this type of WORDING?attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:37 pm Age - please brain fart elsewhere you are really really boring me now.
you have SHOWN and PROVEN that WHEN I am Wrong you are ABLE TO POINT 'that' OUT, BUT WHEN I am LEADING TOWARDS SHOWING and PROVING 'things' the other way around, you want to DETRACT and/or RUN AWAY?
Is it just TOO HARD for you to ADMIT when you ARE Wrong?
But 'you', "attofishpi", can SEE THROUGH ALL CONTEXT, and CAN COMPREHEND the CONTEXT of ALL statements, correct?attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Mar 18, 2023 1:03 pm It's not that I am NOT ABLE, it's that I don't care what you think because what you think is using a brain that needs to be rewired for social interactions where it can comprehend the CONTEXT of statements, NOT purely the words used but the reason they are used that very often is diguised in nuance.
Also, 'you' are just doing your USUAL of ATTEMPTING to DISTRACT and DETRACT from what I am POINTING OUT, SHOWING, and PROVING here.
Which, LOL, is ALWAYS WHEN you are NOT ABLE to INTERACT. And this is BECAUSE EITHER your LIES, your UNKNOWING, or your CONTRADICTIONS or INCONSISTENCIES will BE HIGHLIGHTED if you ATTEMPTED TO.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Mar 18, 2023 1:03 pm I truly am sorry, but I cannot interact with you beyond a few statements.
As ALREADY PROVED IRREFUTABLY True.