uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:11 am
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 12:07 amYou EXPECT me to answer YOUR QUESTIONS posed to me, correct, YET you will NOT answer MY QUESTIONS posed to you?
Your questions have been answered many times over by myself and others in the almost three years that you have been asking them.
OF COURSE, SOME of my questions have been answered. But FAR MORE questions are NOT answered than are answered. And when they are answered most of the time the ACTUAL QUESTION posed is NOT answered. For example, JUST LIKE NOW.
Considering the ACTUAL CLARIFYING QUESTION I posed to you here, and YOUR RESPONSE, I wonder if you can SEE the funny side of this.
I asked you a specific CLARIFYING QUESTION, which you have NOT YET ANSWERED. ONCE AGAIN, YOUR RESPONSE is NOT answering the ACTUAL QUESTION, posed to you. As I was just saying and stating.
uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:11 am
You set your stall out with your first two posts, both dated Aug, 2018:
What does "You set your stall out ..." mean and refer to EXACTLY, to you?
uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:11 am
Age wrote: ↑Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:26 amOf course someone would agree with you. You make sense.
What is this in relation to, EXACTLY?
It OBVIOUSLY was NOT in relation to ANY thing you said or wrote "uwot".
This appears to be a pretty weird thing to bring into this conversation, especially considering the fact that the one that I was responding to is NOT talking in this thread.
Unless, OF COURSE, 'you' are one and the same.
So, WHY did you bring what you quoted me saying here, over two years ago in another thread, into this thread?
uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:11 am
The reason physicists can not comprehend is because they are just like religionists. They both, by definition, have a very narrow way of looking at things. They both twist the definitions of words into a terminology that best suits either ones already held very narrow world view.
WHY did you add this?
I was OBVIOUSLY just explaining WHY some thing was occurring to someone, which they asked for. I was also just being TOTALLY Honest with them.
What are you 'trying to' make or do by adding these words of mine here?
uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:11 am
Age wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 1:48 amHow do you define Universe?
If the definition for 'Universe' is everything, then how could everything expand?
Only something limited, thus not everything, could expand.
Are some galaxies coming closer together?
If so, then where exactly is this expansion, you talk of, supposedly talking place?
Has the furthest parts of the Universe been observed?
If not, then how do you know, for sure, that whatever it is that you define the 'Universe' as is expanding?
In the time some people learn enough to earn a degree, you have learned how to use the caps lock.
What has this got to do with absolutely ANY thing you quoted me as saying and writing here?
And, considering that I did NOT use one capital letter, other than at the start of a sentence, then this seems like a REALLY WEIRD thing to say and point out here. So, WHY did you want to write what you did here?
By the way I NEVER use caps lock ANYWAY. I REALLY SUGGEST that you do CLARIFY, BEFORE you MAKE ANY ASSUMPTIONS, AT ALL. Also, considering I STILL do NOT YET KNOW how to use 'caps lock', on this computer, and may NEVER learn how to use 'caps lock' on this computer, human kind, itself, could learn some things to earn, to you, SOME UNBELIEVABLE things, let alone just some people learning enough to "earn" some miserable little, so called, "degree" BEFORE I ever learn how to use the 'caps lock'. But, SO WHAT?
uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:11 am
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 12:07 amNow, would you like to inform us of what blue shift is 'evidence for', or what blue shift 'indicates'?
"Us"?
YES 'us'.
'We' would like to SEE if you have the courage to ADMIT what blue shift 'indicates' or is 'evidence' for.
uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:11 am
Age, everybody but you understands what blue shift indicates.
So, EVERY human being that has EVER lived, including ALL new born ones and ALL children, ALL understand what blue shifts indicates, correct?
This, AFTER ALL, is what you ACTUALLY wrote, AND MEANT, here. And, if this is NOT what you ACTUALLY MEANT, then I suggest ONLY saying and writing what you ACTUALLY MEAN, INSTEAD. That way you will NOT be SO WRONG, as OFTEN AS YOU ARE.
Now, what you just wrote and said here can also be SEEN as a COMPLETE and UTTER ATTEMPT at DISTRACTION.
You WANT to use 'red shift' as 'evidence' of an expanding Universe, however, you will NOT even LOOK AT and DISCUSS what 'blue shift' IS 'evidence' for.
Which PROOFS what I have ACTUALLY been saying and POINTING OUT.
Talking to 'you', adult human beings, in the days when this was written, was like talking to 'you', adult human beings, in the days when 'you' BELIEVED that the earth was at the center of the Universe. 'you' ALL will NOT LOOK AT and DISCUSS what thee ACTUAL Truth IS.
If it is said that 'red shift' is "evidence" for an expanding Universe, then OBVIOUSLY 'blue shift' is 'evidence' for some thing else, which 'you', "uwot", OBVIOUSLY do NOT like to express, say, write, and ADMIT in words. This is BECAUSE 'it' goes AGAINST EVERY BELIEF 'you' now have concerning the Universe, Itself.
You ONLY want to LOOK AT and SEE here what you ALREADY BELIEVE is true. EXACTLY like those who BELIEVED that the sun revolves around the earth.They ALSO will NOT LOOK AT and DISCUSS what thee ACTUAL Truth IS.
So be it. This ONLY FURTHER backs up and supports my CLAIMS about how the Mind and the brain ACTUALLY WORK. So, either way, ALL OF THIS just NATURALLY back up and support my CLAIMS ANYWAY, or in ALL WAYS.