If they "may appear" to be two very different words, to you, then what are they EXACTLY?
To 'me' they ARE two very different words. LOOK, each and EVERY letter is VERY DIFFERENT. These two words also HAVE two VERY DIFFERENT meanings/definitions.
To 'me' they ARE REALLY two words. They also appear as two words.
They are separate from each other. That is WHY you had to use DIFFERENT letters to write them out, and which are CLEARLY 'separate', as evidence and proven above.
OF COURSE there is NO, so called, "cut-off points" ANYWHERE in Life. But because of how the human brain works, it makes distinctions and uses names/labels. By doing so it causes a perceived separation. In fact it actually makes and creates 'separation' through the use of providing DIFFERENT meanings/definitions for the names/labels that they have made up and created.
This can be CLEARLY SEEN, evidenced AND proven, literally, through the use of separated 'words'. Can 'you' SEE (and HEAR) the 'gap' between words here. It is this 'gap' that, literally, causes 'separation' between words.
Human beings cause and create this 'gap' because it is this separation/distinction, which is what makes better understanding of the 'world' in which they live, easier and simpler.
Do you mean in relation to 1. the actual 'light' and 'dark' them self, 2. the actual words themselves, or 3. the idea/concept/definition/meaning those words conjure up in and for 'you', human beings?
1. There is NO actual "cut-off point" between the actual thing of 'light' and 'dark'.
2. The actual 'cut-off point' between the word, themselves, I explained above, and which can be clearly seen by the use of 'gaps' and/or the word 'and'.
3. The actual 'cut-off point' between the ideas/concepts/definitions/meanings/ are discovered and KNOWN when and after 'you' human beings talk peacefully together and CLARIFY with "EACH OTHER" about how 'you', individually, SEE THINGS.
If this is what 'you' SEE, then so be it. But "others", literally, SEE 'things' DIFFERENTLY.
Or, do you NOT believe this?
OF COURSE they ARE.
But 'you' use of the words 'every one', with a 'gap', which implies and even infers 'separation'. To overcome 'tripping up' with this problem/issue I use the word 'Everyone', to explain and refer to thee One and ONLY One, and the words 'every one' to explain and refer to 'you', individual and separated 'things'.
That I have used these separate and different words to explain and refer to different things can be CLEARLY SEEN, EVIDENCED and PROVEN in my communication with 'you', human beings, here in this forum.
I KNOW. I have alluded to this continuously, and have even said this a FEW times ALREADY.
Does this contradict your claim that, the words, 'light' and 'dark' are NOT two very different things?
I have been wondering WHEN 'you' will SEE the contradiction about 'trying to' write and explain about thee One (Truth) using separated and different (meaning) words?
WHERE and WHEN 'you', "dontaskme", have been 'tripping up' has been CLEARLY OBVIOUS, to 'me', and do you remember about our third or fourth communication where I asked you would you like some help to better explain what 'it' is that you are 'trying to' explain and communicate here?
The word 'light' exists because 'you', human beings, came up with and created that word to help in communicating better with "each other" what 'you' OBSERVE and EXPERIENCE.
The word 'light' did NOT come to exist ONLY because of the word 'dark'. They are just the words used by some human beings who use the language labeled and called 'the english language'.
Absolutely ANY word could have come to exist the opposite of what is known as 'dark'. The word 'light' just happens to be the word used, by some people.
LOOKING AT 'things' objectively, instead of subjectively, helps tremendously in SEEING, UNDERSTANDING, and EXPLAINING thee Truth of 'things'.
The meaning of 'light', just like the meaning of EVERY word, depends on the one using the word/s.
Remember, absolutely EVERY thing is relative to, (or depended upon) the 'observer'.
Is it possible for ANY thing to have ANY meaning on its own?
Where does 'meaning' come from?
Does ANY thing have 'meaning' UNTIL 'you', human being, gives 'it' 'meaning'?
It appears to take you a VERY LONG TIME to (try to) explain things.
Also, is it not possible to have ANY concept of 'light' if the word 'dakn', for example, is absent?
Furthermore, is it impossible to have ANY concept of 'light' for the blind and death person who the word 'dark' is absent to. OR, are there other ways to gain concepts other than just through 'english' words?
If you say so.
LOL If you say so, then okay.
This "logic" helps in explaining and SHOWING WHY 'you' have so much trouble 'trying to' understand and explain thee ACTUAL Truth of 'things'.
Yet is was 'you', "dontaskme", who said and CLAIMED that; "Words ARE dualistic".
So, are 'words' now REALLY 'non-dual' or 'dual', to 'you'?
Here is ANOTHER PRIME EXAMPLE who will 'try to' say and claim about absolutely any thing in order to back up and support their currently held BELIEF.
By the way, and I have said this before to you, what you BELIEVE is true and which you are 'trying to' explain and claim here is ALREADY True.
What you BELIEVE is True. You just keep 'messing It up' by 'trying to' justify, rationalize, and/or explain it.
I suggest getting HELP from "others" instead of 'trying to' do it all by "your" 'self'.
Please do you NOT use 'me' for help if that thought disgusts you. But, really, how have you been getting along with this on your own?
This is what 'you', "dontaskme", accept and BELIEVE is true. But this is the EXACT OPPOSITE for me.
To 'me', 'Life' is Truly rational and Purely logical. 'Life', Itself, makes PURE rational and logical sense.
'Life' REALLY IS very simple AND easy. There is, literally, NOTHING hard NOR complex in and about 'Life', Itself.
'Life' is just a continually evolving-creation, leading up to discovering and KNOWING thy Self. Once this is achieved, which it has ALREADY, then 'you', human beings, can begin to start living in peace and in harmony with "one another" together as One, forever more.
I suggest discovering, working out and/or learning what thee 'Mind' IS, EXACTLY, BEFORE 'you' start talking about 'It' as though 'you' KNOW what thee 'Mind' IS.
LOL The CONTRADICTION here is STRIKING.
What you are, literally, saying here is;
Some 'thing' is inconceivable because I KNOW what that 'thing' IS. LOL If you can KNOW what some 'thing' IS, then 'it' IS CONCEIVABLE.
So, 'you' use words to explain (and CLAIM as real) that words can NOT explain what is real/reality.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 9:41 am IN REALITY..Life is jointly light and dark with all their meanings stuck to it. Freedom from these labels is pure light: light that cannot be seen, thought of, or written about, darkness that cannot be seen, thought of, or written about.
Words cannot touch reality as being real because its a simulation appearing real.
.
I lose count of the amount of CONTRADICTIONS 'you', "dontaskme" make and create.