Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sun Dec 02, 2018 6:25 am
Age wrote: ↑Sun Dec 02, 2018 6:18 am
Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sun Dec 02, 2018 5:49 am
I am not saying much because you are not saying much and I don't intend to waste my time explaining.
But you do NOT have to explain anything at all.
All you have to do is provide what you BELIEVE, I "believe" is IRRATIONAL. Surely that is about the most simplest thing to do.
If a person says they KNOW some thing, then surely they can provide some evidence for this.
Btw, you are the one who is claiming there is something 'X' you 'know' which I do not know.
What are you talking about now? What is this 'X' that you are referring to now?
Age wrote: ↑Sun Dec 02, 2018 6:18 amAs such you should be the one providing evidences, rational arguments and proofs which I have been asking from the start.
WHERE and WHEN did you ask for some thing regarding this 'X' thing, that you are talking about NOW?
Age wrote: ↑Sun Dec 02, 2018 6:18 amYou had killed any potential discussion with 'I do NOT have any Beliefs'.
BUT I have said, 'I do NOT have any BELIEFS' since before this discussion ever began.
Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sun Dec 02, 2018 6:25 amUntil you provide evidence, rational arguments and proofs, whatever X that you claimed to have experienced or known
is no different from a schizo claiming he had experienced and know gnomes are 'real' because he 'spoke' to the gnomes in his garden.
YOU are the one talking about some 'X' thing, NOT me.
You just said here that you have been, supposedly, asking from the start for proofs, et cetera for 'X'. So, if that is really TRUE, then you would KNOW what 'X'' IS. AND THEN, you would be able to provide some reference to what 'X' actually IS. So, either provide it, or do NOT provide it. But just continually talking about some 'X' thing, which only YOU are aware of, and NOT sharing it, does NOT seem to be the actions of a Truly sane person.
Now back to where this began, that is before you TRIED TO deviate way from LOOKING AT my so called BELIEFS.
I said that I do NOT have any BELIEFS. Therefore, I can NOT provide any examples of any BELIEFS.
You, however, have said that you do KNOW that I HAVE BELIEFS. Therefore, if that was TRUE, then you could VERY easily provide some examples of said BELIEFS.
But you WILL NOT DO THIS. Why?
Considering this is a thread, started by YOU, supposedly about the "Critical importance" of providing links, references, and supporting evidences, yet it seems rather hypocritical that you, yourself, will NOT even REFERENCE with examples the things that you say DO EXIST, and which others are totally unaware of WHAT YOU ARE ACTUALLY TALKING ABOUT.
You behave EXACTLY like a person who says, GOD EXISTS, but fails to provide any examples at all of what God actually is.
If a person says that some thing EXISTS, then they should provide some sort of an example of what said thing IS, BEFORE ,any sort of supporting evidence, for either way, could begin properly and correctly.
You veritas aequitas BEHAVE in the EXACT SAME way as these religious people, and you are a prime example of, the very people that you so dearly love to criticize and dehumanize.
You said this 'X' thing EXISTS. Provide some examples of what 'X' supposedly IS.
You said that I have BELIEFS. Provide just one example of just one BELIEF.
If you do NOT provide any examples, then YOU ARE THE EXACT SAME AS A RELIGIOUS FANATIC.