Philosophy Now Forum

Were you not looking for a philosophical discussion on the picture as you stated? Sure, initiated by Flannel's explanation of the picture. Pictures require commentary, as suggested by the forum, or least it once was, I haven't bothered to look since I first saw it, since it's a totally rational sug...

It speaks for itself, miss trump. Your need for the picture to be fake is too consuming for you. It speaks for itself, miss trump. Your need for the picture to be fake is too consuming for you. Uh, no. - It's like I said, already. - Your picture. Your obligation to comment about your picture. - It'...

I'm more interested in your thoughts on the matter. I didn't post the picture. I'm an objective observer. If the is picture real, I could offer a philosopical posting. If the picture is fake, I could offer a philosophical posting. If I had posted the picture, I could offer a philosphical posting. M...

Well according to the website Snopes.com, There's a popular expression ... Snopes is for dopes. I'm surprised you haven't heard it. I'd like to hear Flannel's thoughts on your observations concerning the picture, and what that means philosophically. After all she posted the picture. But man I tell ...

He projects and accuses others of projection. Fascinating. Sigh. I already explained, but you come to see what you want to see, and you never come to know. Posting any picture, fake-looking or not, in the age of AI and CGI, is no longer evidence of anything. Therefore, Miss Balls, as a philosopher,...

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 10:10 am

Now you're really sounding like a woman.

Uh, you began the discussion by posting the picture, sweetie.

Anyway, I'm done with your being insulted.

Man up.

- I see a possibly faked picture, in the age of AI and CGI, that lacks any accompanying interpretation by the poster. - Flannel is afraid to offer an analysis of what the picture means, philosophically. - He, and I'm beginning to think she, so wants to believe in the picture. - That's why he thinks...

:lol: Don't worry about it. You're obviously not a philosopher. The picture looks fake. In the age of CGI and corrupt government, such fake-looking pictures don't cut the mustard. They cut the cheese. * You're a good sport, but you missed an opportunity. So what if you felt insulted. Man up, butterc...

"quit dodging" said the man who opened the conversation with insults and has not admitted his error, but instead has proceeded to move goal posts repeatedly. As the written record shows, I have not made an error in exposing your lack of philosophical commentary, prompted with Sculptor-sty...

Just responding to your fake looking picture. You didn't even add a comment with the picture, let alone explain anything. I'd say that leaves it up for grabs. Did you come to see insults, or did you come to see opportunities to philosophize. (I suggest you reference the brilliant "favourite lyr...

What you need to do to philosophize is explain the meaning of ...

Take off that hat
Raise your Right hand
And put your Left hand here

Do a bit of googling and find out if it's fake. If it's not fake, I would expect multiple independent news organizations, from all sides of the political aisle, to report on it. If it is fake, I would expect it to either only be reported on by a few low tier news organizations, or if it's being rep...

This is age AI, and CGI.
You should care about that.

Wake up, Einstein.



Quit dodging. What is the meaning of the picture?

You started the conversation with insults, so it's time to man up and own your mistake. You said I was being gullible, and now that it turns out the image is real it's time for you to admit that your knee jerk response to the image, to insult the intelligence of people who think it's real, was fool...

(continued)

Otherwise, if you don't philsophize, you're just mechanically tap-dancing to AI's mechanical beat.