16 Wikipedia pages
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13983
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: 16 Wikipedia pages
''Some seriously crazy shit is going to happen in the future''
Can't you find some more mature sites?
Can't you find some more mature sites?
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: 16 Wikipedia pages
Remember you're only an audience of one.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:''Some seriously crazy shit is going to happen in the future''
Can't you find some more mature sites?
So what's your cup of tea and I'll keep my eyes open?
PhilX
-
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 1:53 am
Re: 16 Wikipedia pages
I never got how they ever determined things like in (1) Meteors from Mars on Earth? While the explanation for it is fine, how do they determine this? Do you or anyone know how they derive this conclusion?
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: 16 Wikipedia pages
Scott,
This offers the best explanation to your meteorite question (but it leaves open the possibility that the meteorites may come from somewhere else besides Mars):
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martian_meteorite
PhilX
This offers the best explanation to your meteorite question (but it leaves open the possibility that the meteorites may come from somewhere else besides Mars):
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martian_meteorite
PhilX
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12314
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: 16 Wikipedia pages
Is it tho'? As from the looks of it it's a computer simulation.Philosophy Explorer wrote:No. 2 (kinesin) is a sight to behold:
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: 16 Wikipedia pages
And even if it is. Your avatar is a cartoon simulation of a rooster. Does the "simulation" give you some idea as to what's taking place?Arising_uk wrote:Is it tho'? As from the looks of it it's a computer simulation.Philosophy Explorer wrote:No. 2 (kinesin) is a sight to behold:
PhilX
-
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 1:53 am
Re: 16 Wikipedia pages
Thank you. This helps. I'm guessing a lot of people questioned this as I did and wish that documentaries that mention this explain a little more up front as this. I don't think it seems too much of an extended effort to explain.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Scott,
This offers the best explanation to your meteorite question (but it leaves open the possibility that the meteorites may come from somewhere else besides Mars):
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martian_meteorite
PhilX
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: 16 Wikipedia pages
It's been one of my complaints that articles are often short on details, even if they need to be repeated. That's one of the reasons why I post more than one article on the same subject.Scott Mayers wrote:Thank you. This helps. I'm guessing a lot of people questioned this as I did and wish that documentaries that mention this explain a little more up front as this. I don't think it seems too much of an extended effort to explain.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Scott,
This offers the best explanation to your meteorite question (but it leaves open the possibility that the meteorites may come from somewhere else besides Mars):
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martian_meteorite
PhilX
PhilX
-
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 1:53 am
Re: 16 Wikipedia pages
This is a computer simulation. The logic of the protein is actually quite simple on the level of chemistry. What appears something 'cute' and 'lifelike' is only our own accidental interpretation. I wonder, though, how this actually happens with respect to time. I'm guessing that this would and should be actually very, very rapid. So the computer generation only should be illustrating it in reference to a highly 'slowed' down perspective useful for our interpretation only.Arising_uk wrote:Is it tho'? As from the looks of it it's a computer simulation.Philosophy Explorer wrote:No. 2 (kinesin) is a sight to behold:
-
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 1:53 am
Re: 16 Wikipedia pages
This is a good approach. Reality is so perspective-dependent and we as humans require multiple examples in experience to induce meaning even where one might be sufficient logically.Philosophy Explorer wrote: It's been one of my complaints that articles are often short on details, even if they need to be repeated. That's one of the reasons why I post more than one article on the same subject.
PhilX
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12314
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: 16 Wikipedia pages
In about the same way that the cartoon rooster gives you an idea of a rooster.Philosophy Explorer wrote:And even if it is. Your avatar is a cartoon simulation of a rooster. Does the "simulation" give you some idea as to what's taking place?