For the discussion of all things philosophical, especially articles in the magazine Philosophy Now.
https://forum.philosophynow.org/
On philosophy forums / in philosophy departments / in philosophy books and magazinesSkepdick wrote:
where does this Philosophy thing exist exactly ?
So on philosophy forums, in philosophy departments in philosophy books and magazines.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 5:50 pm On philosophy forums / in philosophy departments / in philosophy books and magazines
in the minds of philosophers / in the minds of non philosophers when doing philosophy
It only exists in your mind as it means nothing to me or anyone else since it is entirely meaningless so no more for me to say hereSkepdick wrote:
So on philosophy forums in philosophy departments in philosophy books and magazines
In the minds of philosophers or people who do philosophy the concept of frompulteft does not exist ?
The concept exists in your mind and in my mind !
It exists on this forum now !
How do you define the mind?Skepdick wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 5:53 pmSo on philosophy forums, in philosophy departments in philosophy books and magazines.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 5:50 pm On philosophy forums / in philosophy departments / in philosophy books and magazines
in the minds of philosophers / in the minds of non philosophers when doing philosophy
In the minds of philosophers, or people who do philosophy the concept of "frompulteft" does not exist?!?!?
The concept exists in your mind and in my mind!
It exists on this forum now!
We created it b talking about it.
You are obviously not going to let up on your infantile misdirection of the purpose of this thread. I'm out. Bye.Skepdick wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 7:30 amSteve, you are very dishonest man. The above is a rhetorical question, even though I emphasize a yes/no answer.SteveKlinko wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 1:13 pm Here is your question again:
Can "Oneness" and "Redness" be put into words or not? This is not a word-play - this is a yes/no question.
That was no rhetorical question.
You even emphasize a yes/no answer.
Because the answer to the rhetorical question is obviously "Yes, Oneness and Redness can be put into words".
If the answer was "No" then you could not have asked the question to begin with!
Well, Steve. It is a juvenile game to try and pretend that you didn't put Oneness and Redness in to words, when that is exactly what you have done!SteveKlinko wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 1:13 pm I know you must know what a rhetorical question actually is so this is a pure grammar school prank again.
You just continue to play juvenile word games.
I have no bloody clue, Steve! If you don't know what Oneness is, why are you using the word?SteveKlinko wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 1:13 pm Back to the question of this topic, which you are trying to obstruct, and in your manner of speaking:
What the hell is Oneness?!?!?
Steve, if the purpose of the thread was to put Oneness and Redness into words, then I have some great news for you!SteveKlinko wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 3:56 pm You are obviously not going to let up on your infantile misdirection of the purpose of this thread. I'm out. Bye.