Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 10:07 am
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 8:45 am
The problem is called: severe autism. You can't comprehend the implications that are inherent in language, and obvious to almost everyone else.
It functions like a kind of aphasia, I'd say.
Is 'aphasia' the REASON WHY 'you' can NOT COMMUNICATE and COMPREHEND sometimes "iwannaplato"?
Or, do 'you' FAIL in COMMUNICATING and COMPREHENDING always for some OTHER reason?
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 10:07 am
And in practice a kind of infinite regression, where Age is constantly challenging and asking questions and expecting justification
1. Do 'you' NOT EXPECT CHALLENGING of CLAIMS, especially in a philosophy forum?
2. I found the BEST WAY to UNDERSTAND "another" is by OBTAINING and GAINING AS MUCH CLARIFICATION, and CLARITY, FROM 'them'. It is OBVIOUS 'that 'you', adult human beings, WERE NOT REALLY that INTERESTED in Truly UNDERSTANDING "each other", "yourselves", NOR even "your" OWN 'self', but this does NOT MEAN that I DO NOT.
3. If one can NOT STAND BY, back up, and support their OWN CLAIMS and BELIEFS, then 'they' do NOT BROADCAST 'them' PUBLICLY, especially in a philosophy forum.
4. There is NO kind of 'infinite regression' AT ALL HERE, as I ALREADY KNOW WHERE 'the end' IS, EXACTLY.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 10:07 am
and LOL-ing and referring to 'you' people with blame, never actually managing to justify any of his implicit positions and sometimes explicit positions.
'you', "iwannaplato", STILL HAVE NOT IDEA NOR CLUE AT ALL as to what 'LOL' even MEANS and REFERS TO here, EXACTLY.
If 'you', adult human beings, ARE DOING what 'you' ARE BEING BLAMED FOR, then what, EXACTLY, IS supposedly Wrong WITH 'this'?
Also, I WILL REPEAT ONCE MORE, 'I AM NOT NECESSARILY here TO JUSTIFY ANY OF MY POSITIONS'. BUT, ONCE AGAIN, if absolutely ANY one is Truly INTERESTED, then 'you' OBTAIN JUSTIFICATION.
And, let us NOT FORGET how AS SOON AS 'you' CAME-TO-ACKNOWLEDGING AGREEMENT with just one of MY 'definitions', it was 'you' who THEN BLAMED 'me' FOR NOT CONTINUING in JUSTIFYING MY CLAIM, even AFTER I EXPLAINED A FEW TIMES that 'you' HAD TO COME-TO-AGREEMENT and ACCEPTANCE WITH 'the definition' PROVIDED.
ALSO, I CAN and STILL WANT TO CONTINUE 'that JUSTIFICATION', or ANY OTHER 'one', WITH ANY one who IS Truly INTERESTED TO, BUT it IS 'you' who DOES NOT WANT TO.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 10:07 am
So the whole thing becomes an exercise in experiencing condescension, a never ending dissolving of call communication.
The REASON there IS a FEELING of 'experiencing condescension', within 'that body', is BECAUSE 'you' LOOK AT and HEAR MY WORDS WITH Assumptions based on 'your' OWN personal Past Experiences. Or, what I like to call APE like thinking.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 10:07 am
Of course, he's right to the extent that miscommunication can take place if one assumes things. But if one follows his process no communication happens,
But I have YET TO EXPRESS 'my process'.
So, if ABSOLUTELY here thinks or BELIEVES that if one follows 'my process', then NO communication happens, then 'that one' is just SHOWING and PROVING NOT just HOW OFTEN 'these people', BACK THEN, WOULD ASSUME 'things', but just HOW ASSUMING 'things' can and DOES AFFECT GOOD or EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 10:07 am
just the regress and contact with a pedant from the future who is not one of 'us' people.
Are 'you', people, in the days when this is being written, one of 'the people' FROM, 'earlier people', BEFORE?
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 10:07 am
I assume some computer viruses function like this.
Okay. So, 'you' AGREE and SAY that miscommunication can take place if one ASSUME 'things' in one sentence, BUT, in the very next sentence, to go AND ASSUME some 'thing'.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 10:07 am
Clogging up the hard drive by eating storage.
And, as I have ALLUDED TO BEFORE. If there IS NO ASSUMPTION NOR BELIEF IN 'there', in 'the brain', the computer, then there is NO CLOGGING UP AT ALL, other than BY the views and perceptions being had.
But just A view or A perception, WHEN WHERE 'they' ALL COME FROM, EXACTLY, HAS ALREADY BEEN DISCOVERED, and KNOWN, does NOT THEN HAVE TO CLOG the COGNITIVE WORKINGS of 'the brain'.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 10:07 am
Selective questioning can be useful.
YES, VERY True, and that is WHY I SELECT the ACTUAL SPECIFIC CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, which I pose, and ASK here.