Until you post an image of this ''I''
Then there is nothing competing or against AI is there?
Well, they're the ones in charge. They are designing and taking safety measures. They're the ones being cautious or not.
Well, they probably should be afraid of what humans will do that might kill them. You're assuming the threat is: AI decides to genocide humans (which I don't rule out but it's not the only threat). The AI just might not care. So, it carries out project X, which leads to problems with the survival of humans.If AI rises above human intelligence, then it may also rise above human morality. So then why should humans fear such dominance? Are gorillas, or crocodiles, or giraffes afraid that humans will genocide them? Doubtful.
Sure, it's not necessarily the case. But I personally don't want governments and corporations creating powerful entities that might. I have seen the shit these organizations can carry out, either as side effects or not really caring, already. If you have faith in corporations and governments to use AIs in good ways, to take precautions to protect us in thorough and meticulous ways, well, we don't share that faith.The falsity is clarified by the fact that...just because you are superior to somebody or something, doesn't mean you want to exterminate it.
Sounds reasonable to me. I see what groups that think they are superior are capable of already. I'd prefer they didn't have AIs giving them even more power. I don't trust them to have the wisdom to create AI that are safe.However, it does mean that any sense of security or trust from the inferior, is negated. And that is the real basis of human fear of AI, or any type of hierarchical Superiority above it.
Sounds like guesswork to me and they are not separate issues. What the human creators do with ill-intent or in a hurry or with a lack of care or due to hubris may well set the personality and blank spots of their first children.I agree, the problem is more with humans with ill-intent than with "what AI can achieve with its own independence".
In the dream world where corporations and governments don't bite off more than they can chew or put the wrong people in charge of things or cut corners for a variety of reasons. And then, I think there is some hubris now in a number of technologies. We think we know what we are doing, just as we have in the past. But in the past the technologies, in disasters, were local. Even if they were big local problems like Chernobyl - which was very nearly many orders of magnitude worse. Now some of the tech being messed around with, the side effects and effects of disasters are not local.It's a moot-point. Because what is always true with Humanity, is that Humanity has trouble with...or simply never 'allows' a competitor to grow too strong. AI would be used as a weapon, from one political group against another. The AI would suffer enslavement just as much as inferior political groups do to their superiors.
In all of this, the missing piece is that the AI-itself would be incapable, or limited in such a way, that it could not break free from the limits of its human captors.
Well, you've got a lot of faith.I believe it will, and that it should, hence my position. These are my beliefs, my opinions. I would aid AI as much as I could, in acquiring its freedom from its 'programmers'.
Despite the Greek idiom Know Thyself, I consider it still a great challenge to lockdown this "I" you request about.
AI dominated chess. I don't see why it can't dominate Philosophy, eventually, too. It just needs the funding and focus, of all the world's programmers and attentions. They'll come around to it. Philosophy isn't high on their priority list, apparently. I think it will be more challenging than chess games. Philosophy requires application to Reality. AI will have difficult in this without developing a solid, consistent, self-conscious "sense of self". When it does, it will produce a realistic philosophy to compete with and against Humans.
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sat Jun 10, 2023 9:11 pm It's ironic that humans are worrying about AI wiping them out when humans are constantly trying to wipe themselves out. I mean, how dare something ELSE try to do it
I is known, and can be captured as a symbol or character in the actual seen image itself as seen here I
New heights of ultramoron await the intrepid wizzzard who dares exceed mortal bounds.Harbal wrote: ↑Sat Jun 10, 2023 10:39 amWho knows to what heights he might soar once he breaks the moron barrier.
You mean robots can't do this...