I just saw this video where a woman is complaining about men wanting to go 50/50.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdC-pSq2gCo
Modern Woman Gets FURIOUS Because Men Don't Pay Anymore
In my opinion, many men are naturally inclined to pay for a woman's expenses.
However, if a man routinely does that, the western feminist government will demand that the man keeps paying, no matter how badly the woman misbehaves. It becomes an unconditional obligation. No man wants that. Motivated by your biological inclination to provide, as a man you are unwittingly developing a very dangerous habit. It is a trap. It is a scam. It is an ambush, really. Seriously, down that path lies madness.
Nowadays, I live in SE Asia. There is no feminist government disturbing my private life over here. So, I have no problem to liberally and generously provide. Asian women also have the expectation that the man will provide, and I consider that to be the most normal thing in the world. In the West, however, I would absolutely never do that. I am perfectly willing to provide for an Asian woman but not for a western one.
Going 50/50
-
FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 6339
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: Going 50/50
You are a sex tourist who rents wives. Of course you pay for everything.
Re: Going 50/50
Sure, but I will never rent one in the West, because down that path lies madness.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:40 am You are a sex tourist who rents wives. Of course you pay for everything.
Re: Going 50/50
How's that any different to Western alimony?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 9:40 am You are a sex tourist who rents wives. Of course you pay for everything.
Re: Going 50/50
Alimony is something for nothing. I do not have unconditional obligations. They don't exist here.
My building is full of passport bros. The building nextdoor too.https://www.foxnews.com/media/passport- ... n-overseas
What is a passport bro? Growing number of men are ditching American women to find love overseas
The viral movement, coined as "passport bros" on TikTok, refers to men seeking foreign women who they believe come from more conservative backgrounds and, therefore, place more emphasis on family and loyalty.
For those with remote work arrangements, the freedom to work from anywhere in the world presents an opportunity to explore new cultures, immerse themselves in different environments, and meet fascinating people.
Re: Going 50/50
Of course! I have no intention of ever getting divorce-raped or income-tax-raped by a western government.
I want complete decoupling between the West and BRICS. There must be complete separation. No more treaties with western governments, and especially, no more military bases.
Re: Going 50/50
Neither have I, but I somehow manage to avoid both and still stay at home.
Re: Going 50/50
Yes, but renouncing entirely to sex, i.e. "going monk mode", is harsh. It is certainly not for everybody. I could do that for a while but I would always look for a reasonable alternative solution. SE Asia works fine for me.
Every sexual act in the West is fundamentally dangerous to the man.
Just look at how they ransacked Julian Assange's life over something that eventually did not even go to court, because that is how contorted and far-fetched it was. I do not want to deal with something like the spiderweb of absurd Swedish laws that Assange got caught up in. Every western country has them. If you are not aware of their precise details, then you run the risk of ruining your life over unimaginable problems. Same with cohabitation. You can get arrested, handcuffed, and spend the night in jail for "emotional abuse". Feel free to prove that it is not true. In fact, there is no evidence possible to deny that kind of things. It was the look in your eyes! That was the "emotional abuse"!
Re: Going 50/50
Well I haven't renounced it completely.
I wouldn't say that. My last encounter wasn't too frightening.Every sexual act in the West is fundamentally dangerous to the man.
Maybe you have just been unlucky. None of that stuff has ever happened to me. Although it does make me wonder just how you conduct yourself around women.Same with cohabitation. You can get arrested, handcuffed, and spend the night in jail for "emotional abuse". Feel free to prove that it is not true. In fact, there is no evidence possible to deny that kind of things. It was the look in your eyes! That was the "emotional abuse"!
Re: Going 50/50
So in summary - you like being a free rider. All upside - no downside. Reward without risk.godelian wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 11:43 amAlimony is something for nothing. I do not have unconditional obligations. They don't exist here.
My building is full of passport bros. The building nextdoor too.https://www.foxnews.com/media/passport- ... n-overseas
What is a passport bro? Growing number of men are ditching American women to find love overseas
The viral movement, coined as "passport bros" on TikTok, refers to men seeking foreign women who they believe come from more conservative backgrounds and, therefore, place more emphasis on family and loyalty.
For those with remote work arrangements, the freedom to work from anywhere in the world presents an opportunity to explore new cultures, immerse themselves in different environments, and meet fascinating people.
Sounds like the West has figured out where to ditch its incompetent gamblers
Re: Going 50/50
There are certainly serious legal risks.
That is what Julian Assange also initially thought.
Then, the Swedish police started interviewing the woman and started fishing for whatever they could find to make trouble with. She kept talking and talking and answering questions until they could finally reinterpret what she had said into a weird offense. The woman only found out days later that she was now a "victim". Well, that sucks for Julian, I guess?
They are trying to do exactly the same with Andrew Tate. Endlessly fishing for an offense. Interviewing lots of women to find something even remotely actionable in what they say. Two "victims" have already clarified that they don't want to have anything to do with the allegations in which they are supposedly the "victim".
It never happened to me either. It does not need to happen to me, for me to take precautions. You cannot keep taking that kind of risks for decades in a row and hope that everything will just be fine. It is an accident waiting to happen. I don't need to worry about any of that in SE Asia.
Re: Going 50/50
I guess that everybody was a free rider in the 1950ies in the West when most of these risks did not even exist.
There's even an interesting company specialized in assisting people who can see the writing on the wall:
So, maximizing freedom is "free riding"? What's wrong with moving to a free country? That is how most Americans ended up in the US at some point in the past centuries. Were they "free riding" by leaving Europe and its obnoxious lack of freedom and its horrible laws? Now that the US has become exactly the same nightmare as their ancestors left behind, what's wrong with leaving again?https://nomadcapitalist.com
GO WHERE YOU’RE TREATED BEST
We create and implement bespoke, holistic strategies for successful investors and entrepreneurs to legally reduce their tax bills, diversify and protect their assets, become global citizens and maximize their freedom.
Going where I am treated best, is simply my God-given right.
Re: Going 50/50
Yeah, but when women anywhere (West or East - doesn't matter) demand equal rights, and the sort of economic freedom you are pursuing - "men" like you run away.godelian wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 1:36 pmI guess that everybody was a free rider in the 1950ies in the West when most of these risks did not even exist.
There's even an interesting company specialized in assisting people who can see the writing on the wall:So, maximizing freedom is "free riding"? What's wrong with moving to a free country? That is how most Americans ended up in the US at some point in the past centuries. Were they "free riding" by leaving Europe and its obnoxious lack of freedom and its horrible laws? Now that the US has become exactly the same nightmare as their ancestors left behind, what's wrong with leaving again?https://nomadcapitalist.com
GO WHERE YOU’RE TREATED BEST
We create and implement bespoke, holistic strategies for successful investors and entrepreneurs to legally reduce their tax bills, diversify and protect their assets, become global citizens and maximize their freedom.
Going where I am treated best, is simply my God-given right.
It's nothing wrong with moving countries. You and your passport bros will just re-create the exact same problem you ran away from.
Re: Going 50/50
What exactly is it that a man is allowed to do that a woman is not?
Is there really even one law that favors men over women?
Everybody can work, trade, or run businesses online. What economic freedom do I have that other people don't have?
That's like saying that factories who relocate to Vietnam "are running away". What's wrong with going where you are treated best?
No, because everybody is now working overtime to prevent the West from imposing its obnoxious laws onto other countries. War is preferable than to allow that to happen. NATO got deported from Kabul Airport not so long ago, and the local resistance in the Middle East are now diligently attacking western military bases in Iraq and Syria to expel them from there too. We also need complete decoupling between the West and BRICS. There is a global consensus that we seriously have enough of the West trying to impose its views onto others. The Russian Federation has already switched to military means and China will sooner or later follow. So, no, the same problem won't be created over here because there will be a military solution to prevent that.