The word 'Universe' once meant, everything; all-there-is; or totality, so what, exactly, could there be to disagree with here?Atla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:27 pmWhy the hell would you agree with Age's point. In a multiverse topic, by definition the totality of all multiverses is not the universe.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:23 pmI agree with Age's point that if there is a "multiverse" then the totality of all multiverses is, by definition, the universe. Even a dumb "hick" like me isn't as stupid as you are. What a joke. Spend all your life studying abstractions of math and you can't even see what's in front of your eyes.
Now, in regards to any so-called 'multiverse topic', then before 'that topic' was to even successfully begin, the one who wants to introduce that word and that topic would have to provide a definition for the 'multiverse' word, the 'verse' word, and for the 'Universe' word, and then start explaining how it could even be a physical possibility for there to be 'multi verses', first.
Do you have the ability to do this "atla"?
If no, then why not?
But, if yes, then let 'us' see it.