p. s.commonsense wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:07 pmI ask again: what if there is no consensus, as in the case of your unsuccessful attempts to find consensus on truth in this forum?Janoah wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:49 pmThe peace is the consequence, and the cause is the truth.commonsense wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2024 4:36 pm
But what if there’s no consensus to be found among bellicose nations, in spite of valid arguments on the value of peace for those nations? **
They fight for their understanding of the truth, although this understanding may be perverted.
The achievement of peace cannot be sustainable until there is a consensus on the truth.
For their understanding of the truth they are ready to sacrifice peace and even life.
***How would you propose finding consensus in the real world of conflicting agendas?***
For example, I came to this forum to try to find a consensus on the truth, but here too my attempts are unsuccessful.
How would you create consensus if there are divergent opinions?
How would you overcome any perverted understandings of truth?
By the way, there is a logistic growth development model, it is used to calculate, for example, population growth to calculate the necessary infrastructure
Using this model, it is possible to predict the maximum population on Earth.
When I told the students about this model, they asked how it is that epidemics and wars are not taken into account, because there are only statistics?
I answered, the model works, perhaps when the population limit comes, epidemics and wars begin, and people fight, and do not understand that they are fighting according to this statistical model. I taught that lesson on the eve of the covid pandemic..