Alexiev wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 3:11 pm
Some Westerners think parents SHOULD support their own children.
That is not what it is about. The question is whether the government should force the matter. If you want to force other people, then you must also prove that you are willing to risk your live and die for what you believe in.
After a two-day hearing in which both Costner, 68, and Baumgartner, 49, took the stand to testify, a judge on Sept. 8 ordered Costner to pay about $63,000 per month for their three children, People reported. Baumgartner had sought about $175,000 per month.
The above is obviously monkey business. That is always what it degenerates into. There is simply no problem in the world that the government won't make worse.
One of the many reasons why governments outside the West have never dared to enforce things like child support, is first of all, because outside the West there have always been many more opportunities to attack and destroy the government. Secondly, the local men are much more likely to retaliate, because unlike many western men, they are not just a bunch of feminized simps.
For example, do you really believe that you can get a government to run after Afghan men to force them to make that kind of payments? These Afghan men kept relentlessly killing and maiming NATO soldiers until they finally left. That is why I respect them so much. All respect is ultimately based on the fear for reprisals. I would lose my self-respect if I ever made that kind of payments instead of retaliating.
Afghan men support their children. That is not what it is about. It is about the fact that you either respect them, or else, they will inflict massive reprisals, and after that, you will still respect them.