Marriage is Increasingly an Institution of the Highly Religious: Why That Might Be a Problem
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2024 2:42 am
The title of the article is only partially true:
Marriage is Increasingly an Institution of the Highly Religious: Why That Might Be a Problem
For Muslims, civil marriage and especially civil divorce is considered to be an attempt at overruling Islamic law. It should never be done out of free will.
Since Christianity has no law -- considered by Paul to be a curse -- it is less of an issue for Christians that the government seeks to overrule the law of God.
In that sense, Christianity is highly misleading to Christians.
By signing a marriage contract, Christians incorrectly believe that they are doing what God wants them to do.
In reality, they are doing the opposite. They allow the law of government -- instead of the law of God -- to rule their matrimonial union.
Unlike what Paul writes, it is not God's law that is a curse. It is Paul's own heresy that has turned out to be a curse.
The article also keeps furthering the same old lie:
Civil marriage is immoral because the act of facilitating the government to overrule the laws of God, is immoral.
Paul, the apostate of the law, is responsible for immense damage. May he burn in hell.
Islam protects its believers. Christianity misleads them.
On grounds of God's law, I reject, repudiate, reprobate, and utterly condemn both Paul, the apostate, as well as civil marriage.
Marriage is Increasingly an Institution of the Highly Religious: Why That Might Be a Problem
For Muslims, civil marriage and especially civil divorce is considered to be an attempt at overruling Islamic law. It should never be done out of free will.
Since Christianity has no law -- considered by Paul to be a curse -- it is less of an issue for Christians that the government seeks to overrule the law of God.
In that sense, Christianity is highly misleading to Christians.
By signing a marriage contract, Christians incorrectly believe that they are doing what God wants them to do.
In reality, they are doing the opposite. They allow the law of government -- instead of the law of God -- to rule their matrimonial union.
Unlike what Paul writes, it is not God's law that is a curse. It is Paul's own heresy that has turned out to be a curse.
The article also keeps furthering the same old lie:
Civil marriage has absolutely zero benefits to the man. On the contrary, it is widely considered to be a negative and even life-threatening, if not suicidal, risk to men.These findings confirm that married couples still reap the benefits of the long-term stable relationship that their union provides.
Civil marriage is immoral because the act of facilitating the government to overrule the laws of God, is immoral.
Paul, the apostate of the law, is responsible for immense damage. May he burn in hell.
Islam protects its believers. Christianity misleads them.
On grounds of God's law, I reject, repudiate, reprobate, and utterly condemn both Paul, the apostate, as well as civil marriage.