Well considering the irrefutable fact that you human beings, 'consciousness', a so-called 'higher consciousness', nor even any thing else, 'has a mind', you are, sorry to inform you here "seeds", just plain old Wrong. Even though you were/are 99.99% certain here.seeds wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 6:17 pmWell, based on my "Burning Bush-like" experience described in this alternate thread,...
viewtopic.php?t=41452
...I am 99.99% certain that you are wrong about that.
But, you do not just have take my word on this, you can look at the irrefutable fact for "yourself" if you like.
you do not seem to be comprehending and understanding here "seeds" the irrefutable fact that 'a thing' has to be able to exist first, before 'it' could even have 'its' own so-called 'life essence'.seeds wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 6:17 pmI don't know how old you are, but do you think that the living essence that comprises your singular and autonomous mind...bahman wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 8:01 pmWhy do you think that the life essence must be finite?seeds wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 6:42 pm If it is possible that the universe is the mind of a higher consciousness as I put-forth in my "Burning Bush" thread, then the "spacetime" aspect of this universe is "bounded" in the same way that your own mind is bounded.
In other words, both are bounded by reason of the limited (finite) amount of the life essence that makes up the sum total of each individual mind itself.
(a mind that literally did not exist until a few short years ago)
...is not "finite" relative to the billions of other finite minds? - Is not "finite" relative to the whole?
To be clear, I'm not talking about the ubiquitous essence of life itself, which may permeate the "ALL-THAT-IS." No, I am talking about the limited (finite) amount of the life essence that comprises the sum-total of the closed and personal, inner-dimension of reality of a singular mind and its self-aware agent.
I suggest you prove 'the first', and then move along. Instead of just presuming and/or believing 'the first' just exists, without have any actual proof.
But it is the 'visible body', which has the ability to experience and cause, and 'It' is what is within that body that becomes, has, and/or is 'conscious' of those 'experiences and causes'.seeds wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 6:17 pmCan you write sentences that are more contradictory than that?
Well, I suggest that your "I Am-ness" is what holds the ability to experience and cause, while the interior of the mind is where the experiencing takes place.
Again, there is no 'you', with 'your mind'. As well as there is no more than 'One Mind' anyway. And, the 'Mind' is not owned nor had by any one.
I suggest just understanding and comprehending these irrefutable facts, and then moving along from 'there/here'. That way you will not end up as confused and conflated as you obviously are here "seeds".
Really?
If yes, then who and/or what is this 'you' speak of and mention here "seeds"?
And, where, exactly, did 'this you' come from, exactly?
Answer and clarify these questions, then we can proceed, successfully. Until then 'you' are stuck in your own little made up 'world' here "seeds".
So, this one claims that there is this some 'you' thing, which exists, and which not just has 'its' own 'mind' but also 'its' own 'i am-ness', as well as 'its' own 'soul'.
Once again, who and what is 'this thing', which supposedly now has, or owns, these three things?
As Stupidity, So Closed.