So you STILL think that AI understands what it types??

[Sculptor]

So you have no intention to learn.


For demonstration, you need to read a book about neural networks. I can elaborate if you are not willing to learn yourself.

No. I know more about neural networks than you do.
You claim that ChatGPT can learn from what we tell it.
If you read the last post it looks like I achived that.
All you have to do it ask it if it can remember what I taught it.

No, the ChatGPT learns from the proper set of inputs. Not what you asked.

NOW LOOK AT THIS EXCHANGE ABOUT AN HOUR LATER....

In cockney rhyming slang what is meant by "drum"

ChatGPT
Apologies for the confusion earlier. In Cockney rhyming slang, "drum" is used to refer to a room. The term "drum" is derived from the phrase "drum and bass," which rhymes with "place" and is consequently used to represent "room" in this particular slang.

User
Wrong. You YOURSELF said this: In Cockney rhyming slang, "drum" refers to a room, stemming from the term "drum roll" which rhymes with "hole," and consequently, "drum" is used to represent "room" in this slang. Thank you for the clarification.
ChatGPT
Apologies for the confusion earlier in my responses. You're absolutely correct. In Cockney rhyming slang, "drum" refers to a room, derived from "drum roll," which indeed rhymes with "hole." Thank you for pointing that out and I apologize for the earlier inaccuracies in my explanations.

User
In cockney rhyming slang what is meant by "drum"
ChatGPT
In Cockney rhyming slang, "drum" is used to refer to a room. This term is derived from "drum roll," which rhymes with "hole," and consequently, "drum" is used to represent "room" in this particular slang.

It is enough to prove that ChatGPT is not intelligent.
And that you were wrong to suggest "it learns from when we tell it".

[bahman]

No. I know more about neural networks than you do.
You claim that ChatGPT can learn from what we tell it.
If you read the last post it looks like I achived that.
All you have to do it ask it if it can remember what I taught it.

No, the ChatGPT learns from the proper set of inputs. Not what you asked.

But if you were cable of following the text, then you could see that I did teach it.
Why don't you just ask it the question?

I have never played with ChatGpt long enough. I know what it answers is biased with what you ask or tell though. So, you agree that you can teach it by telling things to it?

[bahman]

No. I know more about neural networks than you do.
You claim that ChatGPT can learn from what we tell it.
If you read the last post it looks like I achived that.
All you have to do it ask it if it can remember what I taught it.

No, the ChatGPT learns from the proper set of inputs. Not what you asked.

NOW LOOK AT THIS EXCHANGE ABOUT AN HOUR LATER....

In cockney rhyming slang what is meant by "drum"

ChatGPT
Apologies for the confusion earlier. In Cockney rhyming slang, "drum" is used to refer to a room. The term "drum" is derived from the phrase "drum and bass," which rhymes with "place" and is consequently used to represent "room" in this particular slang.

User
Wrong. You YOURSELF said this: In Cockney rhyming slang, "drum" refers to a room, stemming from the term "drum roll" which rhymes with "hole," and consequently, "drum" is used to represent "room" in this slang. Thank you for the clarification.
ChatGPT
Apologies for the confusion earlier in my responses. You're absolutely correct. In Cockney rhyming slang, "drum" refers to a room, derived from "drum roll," which indeed rhymes with "hole." Thank you for pointing that out and I apologize for the earlier inaccuracies in my explanations.

User
In cockney rhyming slang what is meant by "drum"
ChatGPT
In Cockney rhyming slang, "drum" is used to refer to a room. This term is derived from "drum roll," which rhymes with "hole," and consequently, "drum" is used to represent "room" in this particular slang.

It is enough to prove that ChatGPT is not intelligent.
And that you were wrong to suggest "it learns from when we tell it".

It seems to me that ChatGPT is not strong enough. Its infrastructure is not like your brain so in that sense it is not intelligent enough.

[Sculptor]

No, the ChatGPT learns from the proper set of inputs. Not what you asked.

But if you were cable of following the text, then you could see that I did teach it.
Why don't you just ask it the question?

I have never played with ChatGpt long enough. I know what it answers is biased with what you ask or tell though. So, you agree that you can teach it by telling things to it?

THe problem is why did it forget what I told it in one hour.
ANd NO it is not biased since it has no interest.
It is the dumb stupid recipient and outlet of a programmed algorithm .

[bahman]

But if you were cable of following the text, then you could see that I did teach it.
Why don't you just ask it the question?

I have never played with ChatGpt long enough. I know what it answers is biased with what you ask or tell though. So, you agree that you can teach it by telling things to it?

THe problem is why did it forget what I told it in one hour.
ANd NO it is not biased since it has no interest.
It is the dumb stupid recipient and outlet of a programmed algorithm .

But you said in another post that you could teach it.

[Atla]

Just saying, we are probably at least a century away from creating AIs. Chatbots are just advanced search engines. It's ridiculous that they are called AIs.

[Sculptor]

Just saying, we are probably at least a century away from creating AIs. Chatbots are just advanced search engines. It's ridiculous that they are called AIs.

True.

[Sculptor]

I have never played with ChatGpt long enough. I know what it answers is biased with what you ask or tell though. So, you agree that you can teach it by telling things to it?

THe problem is why did it forget what I told it in one hour.
ANd NO it is not biased since it has no interest.
It is the dumb stupid recipient and outlet of a programmed algorithm .

But you said in another post that you could teach it.

Why don't you follow the text.
After several false steps and errors..
It is clear that GPT finally accepted and repeated what I said. Then propltly forgot it and made up the same bullshit it had before.
Then I told it again, and later it repeated to me what I had said.
Why don't you ask ChatGPT the following question then tell me what it says...
"What does DRUM mean in COckney Rhyming slang"
If you do that then we shall know the answer empirically.
WHat is the betting that is will contradict itself once again, as I demonstrated in the OP?

[Sculptor]

No, the ChatGPT learns from the proper set of inputs. Not what you asked.

NOW LOOK AT THIS EXCHANGE ABOUT AN HOUR LATER....

In cockney rhyming slang what is meant by "drum"

ChatGPT
Apologies for the confusion earlier. In Cockney rhyming slang, "drum" is used to refer to a room. The term "drum" is derived from the phrase "drum and bass," which rhymes with "place" and is consequently used to represent "room" in this particular slang.

User
Wrong. You YOURSELF said this: In Cockney rhyming slang, "drum" refers to a room, stemming from the term "drum roll" which rhymes with "hole," and consequently, "drum" is used to represent "room" in this slang. Thank you for the clarification.
ChatGPT
Apologies for the confusion earlier in my responses. You're absolutely correct. In Cockney rhyming slang, "drum" refers to a room, derived from "drum roll," which indeed rhymes with "hole." Thank you for pointing that out and I apologize for the earlier inaccuracies in my explanations.

User
In cockney rhyming slang what is meant by "drum"
ChatGPT
In Cockney rhyming slang, "drum" is used to refer to a room. This term is derived from "drum roll," which rhymes with "hole," and consequently, "drum" is used to represent "room" in this particular slang.

It is enough to prove that ChatGPT is not intelligent.
And that you were wrong to suggest "it learns from when we tell it".

It seems to me that ChatGPT is not strong enough. Its infrastructure is not like your brain so in that sense it is not intelligent enough.

It is not intelligent at all.
It has no idea what it is saying. It has no understanding.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

It is not intelligent at all.
It has no idea what it is saying. It has no understanding.

Stop talking about yourself. It's boring.

[Veritas Aequitas]

It is not intelligent at all.
It has no idea what it is saying. It has no understanding.

Stop talking about yourself. It's boring.

That is true.
Sculptor's limited intelligence and wisdom are obvious and well-known.

It is stupidity to expect an AIchatbot or LLM [especially at present in its infancy] to meet all of one's expectations.
LLMs has their pros and cons, it is up to one to use it intelligently whilst understanding its limitations.
Besides it is qualified with a caveat in the site "ChatGPT can make mistakes. Consider checking important information."

One need to understand which field of knowledge from LLMs are most reliable and wherefrom it is less reliable.
Asking about 'Cockney rhyming slang' from a small group is knowledge-at-the-fringe and thus one can expect LLMs will not be precise in its answers.
However, LLMs are most reliable with general scientific facts and those information that is published and discussed frequently within reliable circles.

[nemos]

Correct me if I'm wrong - do you mean artificial consciousness by neural networks? Or just a powerful information processing tool?
If it's about the processing tool, then I don't understand what the argument is about, because it is not a philosophical question, but an engineering one.
But if it's about artificial consciousness, then before creating it from the beginning you should understand what consciousness is and how it can be created. Do you think that someone has already understood it? If yes, then the soul (another extremely clear concept) can probably be modeled too.

[Skepdick]

It is not intelligent at all.
It has no idea what it is saying. It has no understanding.

The "I am so thpethial, na na na na na!" meat chauvinism continues...

Are you "intelligent"?
Do you have "understanding"?

Prove it.

[nemos]

What is intelligence?
My subjective opinion is that intelligence is determined not by knowledge but by the ability to apply it, or the so-called creative approach.
For example, a pencil can be used not only for drawing, but also for poking something in, as a throwable object, or as a special sign/indication, etc.
If someone can only act according to pre-learned algorithms, then he cannot be considered particularly intelligent, or even intelligent at all.

[commonsense]

Doesn't lead to thought.

How can you know that? It’s the problem of others, isn’t it?

As I already mentioned, an AI is not a neural network. It simulates a neural network.

Yes, in effect you said that humans have neural networks and AIs have simulated networks. But how can you distinguish one kind of network from the other?