FSK-ed Objectivity is "Garbage" Objectivity??

[Age]

Dunno who you are quoting/citing... But it ain't Me!

I quoted the real one..

No you didn't.

It just quoted an 'artificial response', which it named 'God' here, right "atla"?

If no, then what actually took place and happened here?

[Iwannaplato]

It was a lie. And no proof has come from that what you claimed about me was true.
Always one set of criteria for others and a different one for you.
I have made it clear what my position is on my assertions and whether they are absolutely true or not a number of times, clearly and directly to you.
Which would mean that if I suddenly claimed something was an absolute or irrefutable truth (such as you do for at least one unproven claim on your part), you could refer to the times I made it clear I do not believe that.

But you lie about me, here, and earlier, despite this.

This is obvious. Denying the obvious is gaslighting, Age.

[God]

Dunno who you are quoting/citing, Atla... But it ain't Me!

No one likes you, God.
Shoo

Then why do use My name (in vain) to ascribe quotes to Me? Do you want 'no one to like you'?

[Age]

It was a lie. And no proof has come from that what you claimed about me was true.
Always one set of criteria for others and a different one for you.
I have made it clear what my position is on my assertions and whether they are absolutely true or not a number of times, clearly and directly to you.
Which would mean that if I suddenly claimed something was an absolute or irrefutable truth (such as you do for at least one unproven claim on your part), you could refer to the times I made it clear I do not believe that.

But you lie about me, here, and earlier, despite this.

This is obvious. Denying the obvious is gaslighting, Age.

But no one could, successfully, deny to you what you believed happened, nor believe is occurring, right?

This is the 'very nature of the beast', as some would now say, but what others would point out is just the 'very nature of belief, itself'.

[Iwannaplato]

But no one could, successfully, deny to you what you believed happened, nor believe is occurring, right?

Asked and answered. You're just rephrasing a question I have answered a number of times.

This is the 'very nature of the beast', as some would now say, but what others would point out is just the 'very nature of belief, itself'.

No, you are confused about this. People regularly talk about things they once believed but no longer do.

You lied about me and can't admit it. At this point we have another instance of you refusing to change a belief you have.

[Age]

But no one could, successfully, deny to you what you believed happened, nor believe is occurring, right?

Asked and answered. You're just rephrasing a question I have answered a number of times.

Okay, if you say so.

This is the 'very nature of the beast', as some would now say, but what others would point out is just the 'very nature of belief, itself'.

No, you are confused about this. People regularly talk about things they once believed but no longer do.

Of course they do. I, obviously, never said otherwise, nor even thought otherwise.

you, once again, appear to have completely missed, misunderstood, or just are 'poor at context'.

You lied about me and can't admit it.

Or, you missed what I actually said, and meant, here.

At this point we have another instance of you refusing to change a belief you have.

If you say and believe that I 'must have' beliefs, then you are one of the ones that I am mostly using here.

[Iwannaplato]

Okay, if you say so.

If you say so: Interjection. if you say so. (colloquial, dismissive) Used to convey lack of agreement together with a refusal to enter into or continue an argument.

Given that we are communicating at the time this is being written, just letting you know, in case you don't know, what you are communicating.

This is the 'very nature of the beast', as some would now say, but what others would point out is just the 'very nature of belief, itself'.

No, you are confused about this. People regularly talk about things they once believed but no longer do.

Of course they do. I, obviously,

Obviously? LOL. If you want to assert you didn't mean that, fine. But it seems, as usual, you can only blame others, unless it is over small issues, for any miscommunication.

You lied here:

Age wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 10:27 am
Well this is Truly one's own completely blinded presumption, which it once again believes is absolutely True.

And referred to me as an 'it'.

If you can admit that you lied, pm me about it. From now on I am paring down my end of the communication to just this point.

[Age]

Okay, if you say so.

If you say so: Interjection. if you say so. (colloquial, dismissive) Used to convey lack of agreement together with a refusal to enter into or continue an argument.

Given that we are communicating at the time this is being written, just letting you know, in case you don't know, what you are communicating.

Why are you quoting something, which for all we know you could have said, and then replying to that?

This is the 'very nature of the beast', as some would now say, but what others would point out is just the 'very nature of belief, itself'.

No, you are confused about this. People regularly talk about things they once believed but no longer do.

Of course they do. I, obviously,

Obviously? LOL. If you want to assert you didn't mean that, fine. But it seems, as usual, you can only blame others, unless it is over small issues, for any miscommunication.

Once again, you could not and did not see what actually occurred here. This, again, is due to your beliefs, or what is also described as, 'The nature of the beast', sometimes.

I will now suggest, which you might find very, very helpful for you "iwannaplato" in regards to your communication with your fellow human beings, and this just even 'try to' look at what they say not from absolutely any of your already gained and strongly held onto beliefs, and just 'listen' to what they are actually saying, and meaning, and see if this helps you in your obvious lack of ability to just notice context, and meaning.

You lied here:

Age wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 10:27 am
Well this is Truly one's own completely blinded presumption, which it once again believes is absolutely True.

And referred to me as an 'it'.

If you can admit that you lied, pm me about it. From now on I am paring down my end of the communication to just this point.

If you can admit that you lied about my lying, then I will allow you to private message me.

From now on I will do whatever I want to.

[Iwannaplato]

As said, you lied about me.
You seem to want me to repeat myself and say my assertions might be wrong. But why would that make sense for me to do, since I have already done this AND you continue to say I believe my assertions are absolutely true.
PM me if you can act like an adult on the issue.

[Atla]

No one likes you, God.
Shoo

Then why do use My name (in vain) to ascribe quotes to Me? Do you want 'no one to like you'?

I use it for laughs?

[God]

No one likes you, God.
Shoo

Where to? I'm everywhere?

[God]

No one likes you, God.
Shoo

Then why do use My name (in vain) to ascribe quotes to Me? Do you want 'no one to like you'?

I use it for laughs?

Ah, so you do want no one to like you.

[Sculptor]

In my other thread, i.e.
Share-Prices are Objective, so is Morality
Discuss??
Views??

You get progressively more absurd.

[Atla]

No one likes you, God.
Shoo

Where to? I'm everywhere?

Yeah that's rather annoying for example. Can't a man have a little privacy? A little tact please?

[God]

No one likes you, God.
Shoo

Where to? I'm everywhere?

Yeah that's rather annoying for example. Can't a man have a little privacy? A little tact please?

Privacy? 'Fraid not. At the risk of repeating Myself, I really am everywhere and I see everything.

As to providing you with tact, had I provided you with that skill, We'd not be having this conversation. That's something I'm afraid you'll have to learn for yourself. It's all part of the 'free will' package I wrote into humanity's 'software'. Good luck with that... and trying to be funny.... Oh, and syntax.