Infinite regress is logically impossible

[Skepdick]

I am not interested in entanglement.

You don't seem to know what it is you are interested in...

[Skepdick]

X and Y cannot lay at the same point since otherwise we are dealing with a simultaneous process and there cannot be any change in the system.

This is incoherent gibberish.

Simultaneous change at an instant in time IS entanglement.

X and Y do lay at the same point. IN TIME.
X and Y do lay at different points. IN SPACE.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_calculus

You could even imagine X and Y in terms of bisimulation. X and Y are bisimulating (mirroring?) each other. Both X and Y change instantaneously because they are perfectly bisimulating each other.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisimulation

[bahman]

X and Y cannot lay at the same point since otherwise we are dealing with a simultaneous process and there cannot be any change in the system.

This is incoherent gibberish.

Simultaneous change at an instant in time IS entanglement.

X and Y do lay at the same point. IN TIME.
X and Y do lay at different points. IN SPACE.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_calculus

You could even imagine X and Y in terms of bisimulation. X and Y are bisimulating (mirroring?) each other. Both X and Y change instantaneously because they are perfectly bisimulating each other.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisimulation

By point, I don't essentially mean a point in space or time. And yes entanglement is an example of a simultaneous process.

[Skepdick]

By point, I don't essentially mean a point in space or time. And yes entanglement is an example of a simultaneous process.

By point you mean a location. In some coordinate system.

If it's a point in spacetime then you can have points along the same y-coordinate (time) OR along the same x-coordinate (space).

[bahman]

By point, I don't essentially mean a point in space or time. And yes entanglement is an example of a simultaneous process.

By point you mean a location. In some coordinate system.

If it's a point in spacetime then you can have points along the same y-coordinate (time) OR along the same x-coordinate (space).

No, by point I just mean a point.

[Skepdick]

By point, I don't essentially mean a point in space or time. And yes entanglement is an example of a simultaneous process.

By point you mean a location. In some coordinate system.

If it's a point in spacetime then you can have points along the same y-coordinate (time) OR along the same x-coordinate (space).

No, by point I just mean a point.

A point doesn't mean anything.

A point in ... what?

[bahman]

By point you mean a location. In some coordinate system.

If it's a point in spacetime then you can have points along the same y-coordinate (time) OR along the same x-coordinate (space).

No, by point I just mean a point.

A point doesn't mean anything.

A point in ... what?

A point does mean something. It is an idea that can help us to understand some other ideas like simultaneous process.