Human

[Philosphicalous]

Mate let’s cut to the chase. The definition of Human in any dictionary and in any language is binary. Therefor the non binary are not human. It is a satanic word to refute what we all are. Mankind Male/Female

I am STILL NOT SURE WHY 'you' do NOT like the 'human' word, especially when referring to 'you', human beings.

Also, WHY do 'you', ACTUALLY, prefer that those human bodies with female reproductive organs be CALLED, LABELLED, and OF 'Mankind' but NOT 'humankind'?

Would NOT putting the human bodies with female reproductive organs under the name or label 'human' be FAR LESS CONFUSING than under the name or label 'man', to 'you'?

You’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind. I think that marvellous

[Philosphicalous]

Mate let’s cut to the chase. The definition of Human in any dictionary and in any language is binary. Therefor the non binary are not human. It is a satanic word to refute what we all are. Mankind Male/Female

I am STILL NOT SURE WHY 'you' do NOT like the 'human' word, especially when referring to 'you', human beings.

Also, WHY do 'you', ACTUALLY, prefer that those human bodies with female reproductive organs be CALLED, LABELLED, and OF 'Mankind' but NOT 'humankind'?

Would NOT putting the human bodies with female reproductive organs under the name or label 'human' be FAR LESS CONFUSING than under the name or label 'man', to 'you'?

You’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind in this life and the next. I think thats a marvellous achievement

[Philosphicalous]

LOL

This is YOUR so-called "logic", "philosphicalous"; I do NOT like the word 'human', SO have CHOSEN that I am a 'Man'.

I shared a personal view of my feelings of the word because I don’t like it’s definition.

The 'personal feeling' of 'the word' WAS, 'I do NOT like it'.

WHICH EXPLAINS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, other than 'you' do NOT like the 'Human' word, ABOUT WHY 'you' have CHOSEN TO CALL "your" 'self' A 'Man', INSTEAD.

You still refuse to accept the word Human has a definition that is clearly defined.

Which is WHAT, EXACTLY?

LOOK I KNOW that the word 'Human' AND the word 'human' HAS A DEFINITION. WHY would 'you' ASSUME I REFUSE to ACCEPT that 'this' or ANY word HAS A DEFINITION?

And, as 'you' STILL SEEM TO BE ABSOLUTELY CONFUSED here, I AM JUST TRYING TO FIND OUT HOW 'you' are DEFINING the 'Human' word here.

Or, what do 'you' think or BELIEVE is the so-called called and alleged CLEAR DEFINITION for the 'Human' word?

Are 'you' even AWARE that 'you' REFUSING TO JUST WRITE DOWN the so-called CLEAR DEFINITION of the 'Human' word is SHOWING and REVEALING that, ACTUALLY, 'you' do NOT even KNOW what 'it' IS, EXACTLY?

Which makes discourse with on the word pointless

The definition for human is male/female humanity everybody on earth I’m not defending the word, it’s an archaic word and exceedingly problematic for the non binary earthlings

[Age]

Mate let’s cut to the chase. The definition of Human in any dictionary and in any language is binary. Therefor the non binary are not human. It is a satanic word to refute what we all are. Mankind Male/Female

I am STILL NOT SURE WHY 'you' do NOT like the 'human' word, especially when referring to 'you', human beings.

Also, WHY do 'you', ACTUALLY, prefer that those human bodies with female reproductive organs be CALLED, LABELLED, and OF 'Mankind' but NOT 'humankind'?

Would NOT putting the human bodies with female reproductive organs under the name or label 'human' be FAR LESS CONFUSING than under the name or label 'man', to 'you'?

You’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind. I think that marvellous

Just so 'you' ARE AWARE just about ALL of 'this' makes NO logical sense to 'me'.

1. I am NOT 'stuck' on 'your' feelings.

2. There is NOTHING here for 'me' to so-called 'get over'.

3. Saying, randomly, 'Everyone IS mankind', is just LUDICROUS.

4. What IS 'the' 'non binary', and, What IS 'the' 'binary', and how, EXACTLY, is the so-called 'non binary' NOT 'human' NOR even a PART OF so-called 'mankind'?

5. Who, or what, are 'they', which, supposedly, do NOT qualify?

6. Who, or what, supposedly, EXTERMINATED "themselves", FROM 'mankind'?

7. Does SHARING what 'you' think is 'marvelous' REALLY BELONG in a philosophy forum?

[Age]

I am STILL NOT SURE WHY 'you' do NOT like the 'human' word, especially when referring to 'you', human beings.

Also, WHY do 'you', ACTUALLY, prefer that those human bodies with female reproductive organs be CALLED, LABELLED, and OF 'Mankind' but NOT 'humankind'?

Would NOT putting the human bodies with female reproductive organs under the name or label 'human' be FAR LESS CONFUSING than under the name or label 'man', to 'you'?

You’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind in this life and the next.

What IS 'this life', and, What IS the 'next life'?

I think thats a marvellous achievement

Okay.

[Philosphicalous]

I am STILL NOT SURE WHY 'you' do NOT like the 'human' word, especially when referring to 'you', human beings.

Also, WHY do 'you', ACTUALLY, prefer that those human bodies with female reproductive organs be CALLED, LABELLED, and OF 'Mankind' but NOT 'humankind'?

Would NOT putting the human bodies with female reproductive organs under the name or label 'human' be FAR LESS CONFUSING than under the name or label 'man', to 'you'?

You’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind. I think that marvellous

Just so 'you' ARE AWARE just about ALL of 'this' makes NO logical sense to 'me'.

1. I am NOT 'stuck' on 'your' feelings.

2. There is NOTHING here for 'me' to so-called 'get over'.

3. Saying, randomly, 'Everyone IS mankind', is just LUDICROUS.

4. What IS 'the' 'non binary', and, What IS 'the' 'binary', and how, EXACTLY, is the so-called 'non binary' NOT 'human' NOR even a PART OF so-called 'mankind'?

5. Who, or what, are 'they', which, supposedly, do NOT qualify?

6. Who, or what, supposedly, EXTERMINATED "themselves", FROM 'mankind'?

7. Does SHARING what 'you' think is 'marvelous' REALLY BELONG in a philosophy forum?

Dude I’m not here to define the meanings of words to you

[Philosphicalous]

I am STILL NOT SURE WHY 'you' do NOT like the 'human' word, especially when referring to 'you', human beings.

Also, WHY do 'you', ACTUALLY, prefer that those human bodies with female reproductive organs be CALLED, LABELLED, and OF 'Mankind' but NOT 'humankind'?

Would NOT putting the human bodies with female reproductive organs under the name or label 'human' be FAR LESS CONFUSING than under the name or label 'man', to 'you'?

You’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind in this life and the next.

What IS 'this life', and, What IS the 'next life'?

I think thats a marvellous achievement

Okay.

You tell me what YOU think it is first.

[Philosphicalous]

You’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind. I think that marvellous

Just so 'you' ARE AWARE just about ALL of 'this' makes NO logical sense to 'me'.

1. I am NOT 'stuck' on 'your' feelings.

2. There is NOTHING here for 'me' to so-called 'get over'.

3. Saying, randomly, 'Everyone IS mankind', is just LUDICROUS.

4. What IS 'the' 'non binary', and, What IS 'the' 'binary', and how, EXACTLY, is the so-called 'non binary' NOT 'human' NOR even a PART OF so-called 'mankind'?

5. Who, or what, are 'they', which, supposedly, do NOT qualify?

6. Who, or what, supposedly, EXTERMINATED "themselves", FROM 'mankind'?

7. Does SHARING what 'you' think is 'marvelous' REALLY BELONG in a philosophy forum?

Dude I’m not here to define the meanings of words to you

You don’t belong in a philosophy forum.

[Age]

You’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind. I think that marvellous

Just so 'you' ARE AWARE just about ALL of 'this' makes NO logical sense to 'me'.

1. I am NOT 'stuck' on 'your' feelings.

2. There is NOTHING here for 'me' to so-called 'get over'.

3. Saying, randomly, 'Everyone IS mankind', is just LUDICROUS.

4. What IS 'the' 'non binary', and, What IS 'the' 'binary', and how, EXACTLY, is the so-called 'non binary' NOT 'human' NOR even a PART OF so-called 'mankind'?

5. Who, or what, are 'they', which, supposedly, do NOT qualify?

6. Who, or what, supposedly, EXTERMINATED "themselves", FROM 'mankind'?

7. Does SHARING what 'you' think is 'marvelous' REALLY BELONG in a philosophy forum?

Dude I’m not here to define the meanings of words to you

SO, 'you' come here, to this philosophy forum, TELL 'us' that 'you' identify as a 'man', BECAUSE 'you' do NOT like the word 'human', make some Truly IDIOTIC remark like, 'A human is man, including a male and female it is binary', and ASK 'us',

1. What does it mean to be Human?

2. Do you “identify” as Human?

BUT, 'you' REFUSE to INFORM 'us' of how 'you' ARE, personally, 'defining the meaning' of the word 'Human', 'human', 'Man', and 'man'.

Even after 'you' went on to CLAIM some absolute NONSENSE, I put it to you dear friend be you binary or non, that the non binary no longer qualify to be human and or to even identify as being a human. I speak standing on the solid rock of the origin and meaning of the “word” Human. while going on ABOUT some 'solid rock origin and meaning of the word 'Human'.

AND, to make ALL of 'this' even MORE Truly ABSURD 'you' CLAIM that 'you' joined 'this forum' to, LAUGHABLY, so-call, 'genuinely discuss' 'this premise'.

1. If 'you' GENUINELY want to have A DISCUSSION around the meaning and/or definition of A word, THEN 'you' PROVIDE 'your' OWN personal definition, which 'you' are USING here.

2. Saying that 'you' identify as a 'Man', BECAUSE 'you' do NOT like the word 'Human', is NOT REALLY A 'premise', NECESSARILY. Or, NOT one WORTHY of DISCUSSING anyway.

[Age]

You’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind in this life and the next.

What IS 'this life', and, What IS the 'next life'?

I think thats a marvellous achievement

Okay.

You tell me what YOU think it is first.

1. If and when 'you' TELL 'me' to do some 'thing', then do NOT expect that I will. However, ASK 'me' to CLARIFY some 'thing', and then I will do 'that' almost as soon as I see the QUESTION.

2. What does the 'it' word here even REFER TO, EXACTLY, which 'you' WANT 'me' TO, FIRST, TELL 'you' what 'I think' is?

[Age]

Just so 'you' ARE AWARE just about ALL of 'this' makes NO logical sense to 'me'.

1. I am NOT 'stuck' on 'your' feelings.

2. There is NOTHING here for 'me' to so-called 'get over'.

3. Saying, randomly, 'Everyone IS mankind', is just LUDICROUS.

4. What IS 'the' 'non binary', and, What IS 'the' 'binary', and how, EXACTLY, is the so-called 'non binary' NOT 'human' NOR even a PART OF so-called 'mankind'?

5. Who, or what, are 'they', which, supposedly, do NOT qualify?

6. Who, or what, supposedly, EXTERMINATED "themselves", FROM 'mankind'?

7. Does SHARING what 'you' think is 'marvelous' REALLY BELONG in a philosophy forum?

Dude I’m not here to define the meanings of words to you

You don’t belong in a philosophy forum.

Are 'you' AWARE that 'you' just responded to "your" OWN 'self' here "philosphicalous"?

[Philosphicalous]

Dude I’m not here to define the meanings of words to you

You don’t belong in a philosophy forum.

Are 'you' AWARE that 'you' just responded to "your" OWN 'self' here "philosphicalous"?

My research shows that the good folk here think your opinions are ridculus and that you need to go. I shall now comfortably put you on ignore forever more.

[Age]

You don’t belong in a philosophy forum.

Are 'you' AWARE that 'you' just responded to "your" OWN 'self' here "philosphicalous"?

My research shows that the good folk here think your opinions are ridculus and that you need to go. I shall now comfortably put you on ignore forever more.

Okay GREAT.

What we, now, can VERY CLEARLY SEE is ANOTHER EXAMPLE of HOW these people would 'TRY TO' get OUT OF backing up and supporting what they SAY and CLAIM here, after they have been QUESTIONED and CHALLENGED OVER their WORDS and CLAIMS, and when they OBVIOUSLY COULD NOT back up and support their Truly ABSURD CLAIMS.

[Philosphicalous]

Not as absurd as the claim that there are 65000 posts a day on this platform when you and Harbatrol are on the only two phucken Dick Whackers to respond to me. :lol

A very very very lackluster first impression.

[Age]

Not as absurd as the claim that there are 65000 posts a day on this platform when you and Harbatrol are on the only two phucken Dick Whackers to respond to me. :lol

Was "english" your FIRST language, as 'it' is said?

A very very very lackluster first impression.

Okay.

But I STILL AWAIT for 'the one' who identifies as A 'man', and who does NOT like the 'human' word, to EXPLAIN what 'it' MEANS by 'man' AND 'human' when 'it' USES those words.