FSK-ed Moral Facts from Scientific Facts

Should you think about your duty, or about the consequences of your actions? Or should you concentrate on becoming a good person?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Veritas Aequitas
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am

FSK-ed Moral Facts from Scientific Facts

Post by Veritas Aequitas »

PH and like do not understand how FSK-ed Facts from the Scientific FSK when inputted in other FSKs can generate FSK-ed facts of those latter FSK.
For example Physics FSK-ed facts can become Chemistry FSK-ed Fact, Biology-FSKed facts can generate legal facts when dealt within a legal FSK.
So FSK-ed Scientific facts can be FSK-ed Moral facts when processed within a moral FSK.

The problem with PH & gang is they relied a 'what is fact' that is grounded on an illusion.
This is why they are unable to understand what should be more realistic.

PH's What is Fact is Illusory
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39577

Why Philosophical Realism is Illusory
viewtopic.php?t=40167

What is a realistic FSK-ed Fact?
Whatever is a fact is always conditioned upon a human-based FSK which dictates objectivity.
Peter Holmes wrote: Tue Oct 17, 2023 11:20 am Elsewhere, VA asserts an analogy or connection between 'oughtness-to-breathe' and 'oughtness-not-kill-humans'.

VA calls both of these 'oughtnesses' physical facts - 'conditioned upon a human-based 'framework and system of knowledge (fsk)'.
But VA also calls the second 'oughtness' a moral fact - 'conditioned upon a human-based morality fsk'.
The purpose of the above analogy is to show that both are represented by physical neural features in the brain and body. They are not commands nor opinions. Physical things that can qualify as facts depend on the respective human based FSK they are processed biologically and psychologically.

As per analogy, the 'oughtness-not-kill-humans' is a science-biology FSK-ed fact.
When this FSK-ed fact is inputted into a human-based moral FSK, it dictates an objective moral fact. This is at least logically valid.
The 'oughtness-not-kill-humans' as a science-biology FSK-ed fact can be easily verified and justified empirically via the science-biology FSK.

Here is an example how the more fundamental FSK-ed facts are inputted into other FSKs to general their respective FSK-ed facts;
Physics is more fundamental than chemistry.

Physics → deals with all that is available in nature. [except one part → atomic interaction]. Physics doesn’t deal with atomic interaction in detail. Everything else in the nature is studies by Physics. Hence it is the most fundamental science.

Chemistry → chemistry deals with atomic interaction.

Following image will give you idea about the relationship between different subjects →
https://www.quora.com/Is-physics-or-che ... undamental
Image

The above basic FSK-ed Fact are incorporated into other fields, e.g. technology, legal, economics, astronomy, etc. to generate and contribute the latter specific FSK-ed facts.

For example,
FSK-ed astronomy facts rely on the FSK-ed Physics and Chemistry facts.
FSK-ed legal facts relied on say FSK-ed DNA facts.
Many of the FSK-ed technological facts are heavily dependent on FSK-ed scientific facts.

So;
X FSK-ed Facts can be inputted in a Y-FSK to generate Y FSK-ed Facts.
Therefore,
Science-biology FSK-ed fact can be inputted into a Moral-FSK to generate Objective Moral Facts.


Discuss?? Views?
Veritas Aequitas
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am

Re: FSK-ed Moral Facts from Scientific Facts

Post by Veritas Aequitas »

Notes: KIV
Veritas Aequitas
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am

Re: FSK-ed Moral Facts from Scientific Facts

Post by Veritas Aequitas »

Notes: KIV
Post Reply