Dictionaries

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
RWStanding
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 12:23 pm

Dictionaries

Post by RWStanding »

Dictionaries
Perhaps the most significant point about dictionaries is that they are not works of philosophy. And if they were used that way, it would spell the end of philosophy, with dictionaries no more than religious tracts. They indicate how words are presently used, and how they were used, with their origins in archaic languages. If a philsopher claims to be an altruist, he is making use of a term that approximates what he thinks he is. In a complete ethical construct of all values, the term may indicate one category in that construct, but what it means in any detail depends on all other values, in opposition and complementary. That is a matter of debate that cannot end.
Impenitent
Posts: 4387
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: Dictionaries

Post by Impenitent »

language's meaning is found in its use...

that which the speaker means and that which the listener interprets are always slightly different...

-Imp
User avatar
LuckyR
Posts: 485
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2023 11:56 pm
Location: The Great NW

Re: Dictionaries

Post by LuckyR »

Dictionaries contain the most rudimentary definitions of words, specifically created to be used by those unfamiliar with the index word. They are kindergarten, not grad school.
Age
Posts: 20555
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Dictionaries

Post by Age »

Impenitent wrote: Wed Oct 11, 2023 12:34 pm language's meaning is found in its use...

that which the speaker means and that which the listener interprets are always slightly different...

-Imp
'Always'?
Age
Posts: 20555
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Dictionaries

Post by Age »

RWStanding wrote: Wed Oct 11, 2023 9:39 am Dictionaries
Perhaps the most significant point about dictionaries is that they are not works of philosophy. And if they were used that way, it would spell the end of philosophy, with dictionaries no more than religious tracts. They indicate how words are presently used, and how they were used, with their origins in archaic languages. If a philsopher claims to be an altruist, he is making use of a term that approximates what he thinks he is. In a complete ethical construct of all values, the term may indicate one category in that construct, but what it means in any detail depends on all other values, in opposition and complementary. That is a matter of debate that cannot end.
If you were to NOT start debating, in the beginning, then there would be NO 'matter of debate' that could NOT not end.
Post Reply