Atla wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2023 6:10 am
roydop wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2023 9:36 pm
The fact that it produces a description about math that reconciles the deepest philosophical question about it, PROVES THAT IT IS CORRECT
Still no actual reasons given, the above is of course just delusional.
You might want to get better at non-conceptuality. If you're going to make big claims based on the concept of the Samsara cycle, first make sure that you can show that your concept is actually referring to something real and fundamental in the world.
Forget about the cycle being that of Samsara. You are hung up on the part that is secondary.
The "something real in the world" IS the state of a message that has been discovered and going through the process of interpretation. My theorys description of mathematics expresses an actual phenomenal state that exhibits both discovered and invented qualities in superposition. How is this not clicking in?
The description of mathematics presented by my theory, resolves the question: "why does mathematics exhibit both discovered and invented qualities, simultaneously?" This deeper resolution of the age-old question: "Is mathematics discovered or invented." doesn't even arise from the conventional understanding of mathematics.
Mathematics appears to be both discovered and invented because it is a message that is going through the process of interpretation. A message is created with the intent of it to be discovered. A message that has been discovered and not yet correctly interpreted, would exhibit invented qualities, due to the continuing manipulation of the information within the message in order to reveal the message.
So that's what mathematics is. It is the ongoing attempt to correctly interpret the message by continuing to follow the initial incorrect interpretation