This OP is applicable to those who share the same definition of what-is-fact with PH.
Here's ChatGpt [with reservations];Question: My interlocutor defines 'what is fact' as 'that feature of reality , that is just-is, being-so, that in/are the case, states of affairs, has truth conditions and is independent of individual opinions, beliefs and judgment.
Without considering any other qualification, but merely based on the above definition, can I classify my interlocutor as a philosophical realist and metaphysical realist?
PH do you agree with the above, if not, why?ChatGpt wrote:Based on the definition you provided, your interlocutor's perspective aligns with key aspects of both Philosophical Realism and Metaphysical Realism. Let's break down the components of the definition and how they relate to these philosophical positions:
"Feature of Reality":
Both Philosophical Realism and Metaphysical Realism assert the existence of an objective reality independent of our thoughts or perceptions. Your interlocutor's mention of a "feature of reality" is consistent with a realist perspective.
"Just-is, Being-so, States of Affairs":
The language of "just-is" and "being-so" suggests an acknowledgment of objective states of affairs in the world. This aligns with the realist view that there are facts or states of affairs that exist independently of our subjective experiences.
"Has Truth Conditions":
Truth conditions are often associated with realist positions. The idea is that a statement or proposition is true if it accurately corresponds to the way things are in the world. This concept aligns with a realist understanding of truth.
"Independent of Individual Opinions, Beliefs, and Judgment":
The emphasis on independence from individual opinions, beliefs, and judgment is a characteristic feature of realism. Both Philosophical Realism and Metaphysical Realism posit an objective reality that is not contingent on personal perspectives.
Given these considerations, it would be reasonable to classify your interlocutor as holding a realist position.
The alignment with key realist principles, such as the existence of an objective reality and the independence of facts from individual subjectivity, supports the classification of your interlocutor as a philosophical realist and, by extension, a metaphysical realist.
Discuss?? Views??