1. That is an assertion. Definitions have multiple meanings under multiple contexts. Under the context I provided the definition stands. You are the one picking definitions.Darkneos wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 12:55 am1. No, you're just picking what agrees with you to make the point. Even by your definition you're still wrong.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 12:52 am1. The definition applies to the context in which it occurs. Multiple definitions are the result of multiple contexts.Darkneos wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2023 12:48 am
It's not what the dictionary said, you just picked the one that agreed with you and then I showed another one.
2. Non dualism isn't a concept we apply meaning to, to say this is ignorance of it.
Again, what is the point. None of your threads seem to have a point or direction. So I say it again, what is the point here? What are you getting at?
2. It is a definition by way of negation, it describes by what is not. As a definition it is a concept.
3. If my threads have no point or direction then why bother with them?
2. No, but again to complicated to explain.
Again, what's the point?
2. If it is to complicated to explain then you do not understand what you think.
3. The point...does it matter? Whats your point in all of this?