you CLAIM something like 'nondual' IS REAL and 'dualism' IS False, YET here you are SAYING 'things' like, 'within one's OWN self'. How, in ALL Honesty could there be 'one' AS WELL AS there be 'one's own self'?
If 'you' SERIOUSLY WANT to FIGHT and ARGUE for 'your' POSITION OF and ABOUT 'nondual', then 'you' REALLY NEED TO STICK to just USING the Right AND Correct words, ONLY
And what IS 'it', EXACTLY, here which 'you' CLAIM to KNOW?
WOW, 'this' is VERY CONVENIENT FOR 'you', "dontaskme", as 'you' then do NOT have to COME-UP-WITH NOR PROVIDE ANY ANSWER WHEN 'you' ARE QUESTIONED and/or CHALLENGED OVER 'this' CLAIM of YOURS here, correct?
BUT the HOW, the WHY, the WHERE, the WHAT, AND the WHEN OF ALL-THERE-IS is ALL ALREADY KNOWN. AND, BY WHO, EXACTLY, AS WELL.
BUT, and VERY OBVIOUSLY, there IS NO 'external' NOR 'internal' 'world' to the One and ONLY 'Universal World'.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon May 08, 2023 12:44 pm This knowing self is sourced only within itself and sounds very much like solipsism, but that's because knowing cannot know what it is like to experience the external world it knows, it can only project the external world it knows from within itself. The external world is not sensed, it is projected from within the source of knowing, you are that knowing.
'Internal' and 'external' are just VIEWS, which 'you', human beings, have MADE UP and which some of 'you' BELIEVE ARE TRUE.
'SOURCE' is ANOTHER NAME that 'you', "dontaskme", USE for what 'you' CLAIM IS 'unnameable'.
So, this is the SEVEN NAME now that 'you' HAVE for the so-called 'unnameable', right?
Okay. BUT do 'you' THINK ANY one FULLY UNDERSTANDS 'this' here?Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon May 08, 2023 12:44 pm Source is the emptiness of all things known. Emptiness doesn't have to mean nothingness. What remains of us when we no longer think or feel anything? like in deep dreamless sleep. Emptiness doesn't mean nothing, it just means there is no substance or separation to be found anywhere in the whole of totalities existence.
.