Skepdick wrote: ↑Wed Mar 29, 2023 6:42 pm
PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Wed Mar 29, 2023 6:40 pm
Now that we have ChatGPT it is possible to automate the otherwise infeasibly large task
of populating a knowledge ontology with the set of general analytic knowledge.
Your ignorance of the subject matter does not count as any sort of rebuttal.
ChatGPT uses statistical learning models and provides probabilistic answers, not deterministic/axiomatic ones such as the one you are talking about.
Your mode of reasoning isn't even in the same ballpark.
I am so tired of bullshitters.
Yes you are correct about ChatGPT. It estimates that baby kittens are very probably
not any type of ten story office building. Steve Wolfram was able to interface ChatGPT
to his own system of deductive knowledge such that it based its answers on this
deductive knowledge.
It took Doug Lenat's team at least 700 labor years to manually populate his CYC project
with the tiny subset of analytical knowledge known as common sense. If we are very
generous and say that this is 1/10 of 1% of all knowledge then it would take twice as
long as the existence of Homo Sapians for one person to manually populate the knowledge
ontology that you refer to.