A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
-
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
To the people who think gender is entirely a social construct, the existence of trans people raises some interesting philosophical contradictions.
You see, if gender in fact is biological, then being trans imo can actually make sense and be meaningful. Gender, biologically, would be a fact about sometimes neurology, presumably. And one could imagine that it's possible that a person born with a penis could have, in some sense, a female-ish neurology. And that could give you context for why people with penises want to live as women, be recognized as women, and have surgeries and hormone therapies to make their bodies more female, to match their neurology.
On the other hand, if gender is entirely a social construct, then a lot of that stuff above doesn't really make sense. If gender is a social construct, then there's no meaningful difference between "I was born with a penis and want to live as a woman" Vs "I'm a man but I like wearing dresses and doing and behaving in ways that are seen as traditionally feminine". Those two statements become almost indistinguishable. And someone in that boat doesn't need a sex change, or to be recognized as a woman, what they really would need, hypothetically, is to live in a society where men are allowed to have feminine preferences and behaviours.
And yet if you talk to trans people, even trans people who insist that gender really is just a social construct, and you offer up that theoretical world where men are simply allowed, with no social penalty, to have entirely feminine behaviours and preferences, you'll find that that's not sufficient for them. A lot of them say they would still want to take hormones, say they might still seek sex change surgeries.
And that to me indicates that the "gender" of people who are "trans-gender" runs deeper than something that is just merely a social construct.
I'm not of course saying that every aspect of gender isn't a social construct, that every aspect of gender is biological. There are certainly parts of gender expression which are entirely cultural. But there does, I think, seem to be something deeper than the social and cultural aspects of gender that people who are trans-gender illuminate.
You see, if gender in fact is biological, then being trans imo can actually make sense and be meaningful. Gender, biologically, would be a fact about sometimes neurology, presumably. And one could imagine that it's possible that a person born with a penis could have, in some sense, a female-ish neurology. And that could give you context for why people with penises want to live as women, be recognized as women, and have surgeries and hormone therapies to make their bodies more female, to match their neurology.
On the other hand, if gender is entirely a social construct, then a lot of that stuff above doesn't really make sense. If gender is a social construct, then there's no meaningful difference between "I was born with a penis and want to live as a woman" Vs "I'm a man but I like wearing dresses and doing and behaving in ways that are seen as traditionally feminine". Those two statements become almost indistinguishable. And someone in that boat doesn't need a sex change, or to be recognized as a woman, what they really would need, hypothetically, is to live in a society where men are allowed to have feminine preferences and behaviours.
And yet if you talk to trans people, even trans people who insist that gender really is just a social construct, and you offer up that theoretical world where men are simply allowed, with no social penalty, to have entirely feminine behaviours and preferences, you'll find that that's not sufficient for them. A lot of them say they would still want to take hormones, say they might still seek sex change surgeries.
And that to me indicates that the "gender" of people who are "trans-gender" runs deeper than something that is just merely a social construct.
I'm not of course saying that every aspect of gender isn't a social construct, that every aspect of gender is biological. There are certainly parts of gender expression which are entirely cultural. But there does, I think, seem to be something deeper than the social and cultural aspects of gender that people who are trans-gender illuminate.
Last edited by Flannel Jesus on Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6802
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-nesd
Yes, there's a contradiction in there. Some trans people are dualists. IOW they would say that their soul (or whatever term they use) incarnated in the wrong form - (the wrong biological sex). So, they want to move their body to fit with their soul. They also would think that gender and biological sex have a connection, but they got a raw deal. That's makes sense. One may not agree with dualisms or this particular kind of dualism, but it is consistant. It makes sense that they want to change their bodies. It makes sense that they do not feel like the biological sex they were born with. Their body does not match the personality, tendencies, desires that go with the other biological sex.
But in the Left in general, these days, you have the idea that there is no connection between personality, interests, temperment or anything else with biology. In this scenario it cannot make sense to say I feel like a woman (if born in a male body). And this view should see the transperson, generally, as confused. There is no such thing as feeling like a woman (really, for anyone) and thus needed to switch gender/sex. And certainly no reason to get surgery.
These two models don't seem to get noticed much except by some people who just hate trans people (and the rest of the letters) and then a few people who, like myself and presumably FJ, who would support people making decisions from either point of view.
But I do think the contradiction is likely messing with the minds of children and young people, ironically enough I think it primarily adversely affects gays.
Because they may now think that they need to change their bodies and go through hormone blockers and more, when in fact, they have no need to change their bodies, they may well, later find. The small percentage who are truly not at home in there bodies are less adversely affected. I would also be concerned about boys and girls who feel like they are quite different from the traditional notions of their sex/gender.
Also, just being told contradictory things, I think, is damaging. Because it trains us to deny cognitive dissonance. Especially if the social climate is so charged by hate on all sides as it is now.
But in the Left in general, these days, you have the idea that there is no connection between personality, interests, temperment or anything else with biology. In this scenario it cannot make sense to say I feel like a woman (if born in a male body). And this view should see the transperson, generally, as confused. There is no such thing as feeling like a woman (really, for anyone) and thus needed to switch gender/sex. And certainly no reason to get surgery.
These two models don't seem to get noticed much except by some people who just hate trans people (and the rest of the letters) and then a few people who, like myself and presumably FJ, who would support people making decisions from either point of view.
But I do think the contradiction is likely messing with the minds of children and young people, ironically enough I think it primarily adversely affects gays.
Because they may now think that they need to change their bodies and go through hormone blockers and more, when in fact, they have no need to change their bodies, they may well, later find. The small percentage who are truly not at home in there bodies are less adversely affected. I would also be concerned about boys and girls who feel like they are quite different from the traditional notions of their sex/gender.
Also, just being told contradictory things, I think, is damaging. Because it trains us to deny cognitive dissonance. Especially if the social climate is so charged by hate on all sides as it is now.
Last edited by Iwannaplato on Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
That view should see that confusion as a symptom of living in a society with very strict social paths for men and women though. The solution, in this view, would be NOT for people to transition genders, but to allow people to behave however feminine or masculine they want without any gender transition necessary. Right? Maybe...Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:47 amAnd this view should see the transperson, generally, as confused.
Re: A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
None that the status quo doesn't already rise.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:36 am To the people who think gender is entirely a social construct, the existence of trans people raises some interesting philosophical contradictions.
How many sub-categories of humans are there?
You are trapped in the stupidity of categorical language.
What's the difference between a "meaningful difference" and a "non-meaningful difference"?Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:36 am If gender is a social construct, then there's no meaningful difference between...
Last edited by Skepdick on Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13983
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
What does that even mean 'Gender is a social construct'?? Please explain.
-
- Posts: 6802
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
Well, to me that's traditional feminism. You're born a woman and you want to be an electrician, keep your hair short and have sex with women...you can absolutely still be a woman. The box is gone. Don't put us in boxes. I think that's a great base. Likewise on the male side.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:49 amThat view should see that confusion as a symptom of living in a society with very strict social paths for men and women though. The solution, in this view, would be NOT for people to transition genders, but to allow people to behave however feminine or masculine they want without any gender transition necessary. Right? Maybe...Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:47 amAnd this view should see the transperson, generally, as confused.
The people truly not at home in their bodies are still going to want more. And that can be dealt with. But now the messages are all over the place.
-
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
That would be up to the people who believe that to explain, I couldn't do it justice because I think it's only a half truth at best.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:57 am What does that even mean 'Gender is a social construct'?? Please explain.
To me, it means that any noticed patterns in the difference between male and female behaviours and preferences is entirely due to socialization and what we as a culture normalize. There is nothing you can notice in the differences in men and women that has a biological explanation.
Last edited by Flannel Jesus on Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:03 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
What is it that you don't understand? Please explain.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:57 am What does that even mean 'Gender is a social construct'?? Please explain.
You have a vagina. Fine.
You have two X chromosomes. Fine.
You ovulate and menstruate. Fine.
You can fall pregnant and give birth. Fine.
You can provide an infinite list of facts/properties and features about yourself. Fine.
But what makes you a "woman"?
Last edited by Skepdick on Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13983
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
That's exactly how it has always been. Who's stopping them? Now we have moronic parents of 'tomboy' girls dragging them off for hormone replacement therapy, when parents just used to accept their tomboy daughters who generally grew out of it after a few years.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:49 amThat view should see that confusion as a symptom of living in a society with very strict social paths for men and women though. The solution, in this view, would be NOT for people to transition genders, but to allow people to behave however feminine or masculine they want without any gender transition necessary. Right? Maybe...Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:47 amAnd this view should see the transperson, generally, as confused.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13983
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
Umm, just what you listed? Actually just the second one would have been fine.Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:59 amWhat is it that you don't understand? Please explain.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:57 am What does that even mean 'Gender is a social construct'?? Please explain.
You have a vagina. Fine.
You have two X chromosomes. Fine.
You ovulate and menstruate. Fine.
You can fall pregnant and give birth. Fine.
You can provide an infinite list of facts/properties and features about yourself. Fine.
But what makes you a "woman"?
-
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
Has it? I'm not aware of this reality where there's no penalty for "wrong-gender" behaviours. Especially if we're talking about America, where nearly half the population thinks gay sex should be a criminal offense.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:00 amThat's exactly how it has always been.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:49 amThat view should see that confusion as a symptom of living in a society with very strict social paths for men and women though. The solution, in this view, would be NOT for people to transition genders, but to allow people to behave however feminine or masculine they want without any gender transition necessary. Right? Maybe...Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:47 amAnd this view should see the transperson, generally, as confused.
No, I definitely don't think that's exactly how it's always been
Re: A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
So having two X chromosomes makes you a woman? Why?vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:01 amUmm, just what you listed? Actually just the second one would have been fine.Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:59 amWhat is it that you don't understand? Please explain.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:57 am What does that even mean 'Gender is a social construct'?? Please explain.
You have a vagina. Fine.
You have two X chromosomes. Fine.
You ovulate and menstruate. Fine.
You can fall pregnant and give birth. Fine.
You can provide an infinite list of facts/properties and features about yourself. Fine.
But what makes you a "woman"?
Surely having two X chromosomes makes you someone who has two X chromosomes?
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13983
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
Nothing to do with being gay, especially as a large percentage of those 'transwimmin' decide that they are lesbian 'wimmin' (how very convenient).Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:02 amHas it? I'm not aware of this reality where there's no penalty for "wrong-gender" behaviours. Especially if we're talking about America, where nearly half the population thinks gay sex should be a criminal offense.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:00 amThat's exactly how it has always been.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:49 am
That view should see that confusion as a symptom of living in a society with very strict social paths for men and women though. The solution, in this view, would be NOT for people to transition genders, but to allow people to behave however feminine or masculine they want without any gender transition necessary. Right? Maybe...
No, I definitely don't think that's exactly how it's always been
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13983
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
A man trying to tell a woman 'what' she is. Fuck off.Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:02 amSo having two X chromosomes makes you a woman? Why?vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:01 amUmm, just what you listed? Actually just the second one would have been fine.Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:59 am
What is it that you don't understand? Please explain.
You have a vagina. Fine.
You have two X chromosomes. Fine.
You ovulate and menstruate. Fine.
You can fall pregnant and give birth. Fine.
You can provide an infinite list of facts/properties and features about yourself. Fine.
But what makes you a "woman"?
Surely having two X chromosomes makes you someone who has two X chromosomes?
-
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: A contradiction, I think, between "gender is a social construct" and trans-ness
It has a lot to do with being gay. You say it's always been that men are allowed to behave like women with no social penalties. I'm literally showing you a clear example where that is decidedly not the casevegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:04 amNothing to do with being gay, especially as a large percentage of those 'transwimmin' decide that they are lesbian 'wimmin' (how very convenient).Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:02 amHas it? I'm not aware of this reality where there's no penalty for "wrong-gender" behaviours. Especially if we're talking about America, where nearly half the population thinks gay sex should be a criminal offense.
No, I definitely don't think that's exactly how it's always been