The Contradiction of the Point

[Age]

Does it matter if it is a contradiction?

In relation to what, exactly?

What happens with your knowledge?

Nothing much, really

Then answering your question doesn't matter as it would become part of your knowledge.

'it' would ALSO BE EXPRESSED here for what 'it' REALLY IS. WHICH, does MATTER to SOME or a LOT of readers.

[Eodnhoj7]

In relation to what, exactly?


Nothing much, really

Then answering your question doesn't matter as it would become part of your knowledge.

'it' would ALSO BE EXPRESSED here for what 'it' REALLY IS. WHICH, does MATTER to SOME or a LOT of readers.

Yet your knowledge does nothing for you and still you argue that the absolute oneness, you claim to know, is not nothing.

How can you speak for others when you have stated that I cannot speak for others (even thought dontaskme, agent smith, and sometimes skepdick agrees with me)? If we are not one then you cannot state everything is one.

[Age]

Then answering your question doesn't matter as it would become part of your knowledge.

'it' would ALSO BE EXPRESSED here for what 'it' REALLY IS. WHICH, does MATTER to SOME or a LOT of readers.

Yet your knowledge does nothing for you and still you argue that the absolute oneness, you claim to know, is not nothing.

How could SOME 'thing' be NO 'thing'?

How can you speak for others when you have stated that I cannot speak for others

BECAUSE it all depends on what is being talking ABOUT, EXACTLY.

(even thought dontaskme, agent smith, and sometimes skepdick agrees with me)?

In regards to 'what', EXACTLY?

And, would you have ANY issue if I CONFIRM 'this', WITH 'them'?

If we are not one then you cannot state everything is one.

But WHO states 'we' are NOT 'one'?

[Eodnhoj7]

'it' would ALSO BE EXPRESSED here for what 'it' REALLY IS. WHICH, does MATTER to SOME or a LOT of readers.

Yet your knowledge does nothing for you and still you argue that the absolute oneness, you claim to know, is not nothing.

How could SOME 'thing' be NO 'thing'?

How can you speak for others when you have stated that I cannot speak for others

BECAUSE it all depends on what is being talking ABOUT, EXACTLY.

(even thought dontaskme, agent smith, and sometimes skepdick agrees with me)?

In regards to 'what', EXACTLY?

And, would you have ANY issue if I CONFIRM 'this', WITH 'them'?

If we are not one then you cannot state everything is one.

But WHO states 'we' are NOT 'one'?

Why the curiosity considering your perspective that 'all is one' necessitates you as having no separation from all the knowledge out there?

[Age]

Yet your knowledge does nothing for you and still you argue that the absolute oneness, you claim to know, is not nothing.

How could SOME 'thing' be NO 'thing'?

How can you speak for others when you have stated that I cannot speak for others

BECAUSE it all depends on what is being talking ABOUT, EXACTLY.

(even thought dontaskme, agent smith, and sometimes skepdick agrees with me)?

In regards to 'what', EXACTLY?

And, would you have ANY issue if I CONFIRM 'this', WITH 'them'?

If we are not one then you cannot state everything is one.

But WHO states 'we' are NOT 'one'?

Why the curiosity considering your perspective that 'all is one' necessitates you as having no separation from all the knowledge out there?

I do not understand your question here.

[Eodnhoj7]

How could SOME 'thing' be NO 'thing'?


BECAUSE it all depends on what is being talking ABOUT, EXACTLY.



In regards to 'what', EXACTLY?

And, would you have ANY issue if I CONFIRM 'this', WITH 'them'?



But WHO states 'we' are NOT 'one'?

Why the curiosity considering your perspective that 'all is one' necessitates you as having no separation from all the knowledge out there?

I do not understand your question here.

Then you are not one with me and if you are not one with me you cannot state everything is one.

But I will explain.

Curiosity necessitates a search for truth. This search for truth necessitates an absence of truth within the observer otherwise there is no search for truth if one already has it. You lack knowledge thus are separate from what you lack. This separation necessitates you are not one with the universe.

[Age]

Why the curiosity considering your perspective that 'all is one' necessitates you as having no separation from all the knowledge out there?

I do not understand your question here.

Then you are not one with me and if you are not one with me you cannot state everything is one.

BUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to.

WHY do you BELIEVE that I can NOT?

And 'you' being 'one' with "another" does NOT even make logical sense anyway.

But I will explain.

Curiosity necessitates a search for truth.

Okay, if you say and believe so.

This search for truth necessitates an absence of truth within the observer otherwise there is no search for truth if one already has it.

Okay.

You lack knowledge thus are separate from what you lack.

LOL WHY would you even BEGIN to ASSUME that ANY 'you' was NOT 'separate'?

Do 'you' even KNOW what a 'you', IS, EXACTLY?

If yes, then what are 'you', EXACTLY?

This separation necessitates you are not one with the universe.

'you' are completely AND utterly MISSING the POINT here, ONCE MORE and AGAIN.

And, the REASON FOR 'this' is VERY OBVIOUS, right?

[Eodnhoj7]

I do not understand your question here.

Then you are not one with me and if you are not one with me you cannot state everything is one.

BUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to.

WHY do you BELIEVE that I can NOT?

And 'you' being 'one' with "another" does NOT even make logical sense anyway.

But I will explain.

Curiosity necessitates a search for truth.

Okay, if you say and believe so.

This search for truth necessitates an absence of truth within the observer otherwise there is no search for truth if one already has it.

Okay.

You lack knowledge thus are separate from what you lack.

LOL WHY would you even BEGIN to ASSUME that ANY 'you' was NOT 'separate'?

Do 'you' even KNOW what a 'you', IS, EXACTLY?

If yes, then what are 'you', EXACTLY?

This separation necessitates you are not one with the universe.

'you' are completely AND utterly MISSING the POINT here, ONCE MORE and AGAIN.

And, the REASON FOR 'this' is VERY OBVIOUS, right?

"BUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to" if you can.

[Age]

Then you are not one with me and if you are not one with me you cannot state everything is one.

BUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to.

WHY do you BELIEVE that I can NOT?

And 'you' being 'one' with "another" does NOT even make logical sense anyway.

But I will explain.

Curiosity necessitates a search for truth.

Okay, if you say and believe so.

This search for truth necessitates an absence of truth within the observer otherwise there is no search for truth if one already has it.

Okay.

You lack knowledge thus are separate from what you lack.

LOL WHY would you even BEGIN to ASSUME that ANY 'you' was NOT 'separate'?

Do 'you' even KNOW what a 'you', IS, EXACTLY?

If yes, then what are 'you', EXACTLY?

This separation necessitates you are not one with the universe.

'you' are completely AND utterly MISSING the POINT here, ONCE MORE and AGAIN.

And, the REASON FOR 'this' is VERY OBVIOUS, right?

"BUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to" if you can.

Has ANY even 'thought' OTHERWISE?

If yes, then WHO, EXACTLY?

But if no, then WHY STATE such a 'thing' as what you did just here?

[Eodnhoj7]

BUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to.

WHY do you BELIEVE that I can NOT?

And 'you' being 'one' with "another" does NOT even make logical sense anyway.



Okay, if you say and believe so.



Okay.


LOL WHY would you even BEGIN to ASSUME that ANY 'you' was NOT 'separate'?

Do 'you' even KNOW what a 'you', IS, EXACTLY?

If yes, then what are 'you', EXACTLY?



'you' are completely AND utterly MISSING the POINT here, ONCE MORE and AGAIN.

And, the REASON FOR 'this' is VERY OBVIOUS, right?

"BUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to" if you can.

Has ANY even 'thought' OTHERWISE?

If yes, then WHO, EXACTLY?

But if no, then WHY STATE such a 'thing' as what you did just here?

Why does there have to be an answer?

[Age]

"BUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to" if you can.

Has ANY even 'thought' OTHERWISE?

If yes, then WHO, EXACTLY?

But if no, then WHY STATE such a 'thing' as what you did just here?

Why does there have to be an answer?

AGAIN, what IS YOUR ISSUE with your apparent complete INABILITY to just ANSWER QUESTIONS POSED, and ASKED TO you, in the threads that you START and MAKE CLAIMS IN?

[Eodnhoj7]

Has ANY even 'thought' OTHERWISE?

If yes, then WHO, EXACTLY?

But if no, then WHY STATE such a 'thing' as what you did just here?

Why does there have to be an answer?

AGAIN, what IS YOUR ISSUE with your apparent complete INABILITY to just ANSWER QUESTIONS POSED, and ASKED TO you, in the threads that you START and MAKE CLAIMS IN?

1. What is your issue with your apparent complete inability to just answer questions posed and asked to you?

2. What rational claims have I made when I point to contradictions?

[Age]

Why does there have to be an answer?

AGAIN, what IS YOUR ISSUE with your apparent complete INABILITY to just ANSWER QUESTIONS POSED, and ASKED TO you, in the threads that you START and MAKE CLAIMS IN?

1. What is your issue with your apparent complete inability to just answer questions posed and asked to you?

BUT I DO NOT HAVE ANY ISSUE.

As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVED here. As I ANSWER the QUESTIONS posed, and ASKED TO me.

you INABILITY to just ANSWER here AGAIN, is SHOWING just how MUCH of an ISSUE you REALLY HAVE here.

2. What rational claims have I made when I point to contradictions?

Have you made ANY 'rational claims'?

If yes, then WHERE and WHAT, EXACTLY?

[Eodnhoj7]

AGAIN, what IS YOUR ISSUE with your apparent complete INABILITY to just ANSWER QUESTIONS POSED, and ASKED TO you, in the threads that you START and MAKE CLAIMS IN?

1. What is your issue with your apparent complete inability to just answer questions posed and asked to you?

BUT I DO NOT HAVE ANY ISSUE.

As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVED here. As I ANSWER the QUESTIONS posed, and ASKED TO me.

you INABILITY to just ANSWER here AGAIN, is SHOWING just how MUCH of an ISSUE you REALLY HAVE here.

2. What rational claims have I made when I point to contradictions?

Have you made ANY 'rational claims'?

If yes, then WHERE and WHAT, EXACTLY?

1. That is your belief.

2. A point divided results in further points.

[Age]

1. What is your issue with your apparent complete inability to just answer questions posed and asked to you?

BUT I DO NOT HAVE ANY ISSUE.

As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVED here. As I ANSWER the QUESTIONS posed, and ASKED TO me.

you INABILITY to just ANSWER here AGAIN, is SHOWING just how MUCH of an ISSUE you REALLY HAVE here.

2. What rational claims have I made when I point to contradictions?

Have you made ANY 'rational claims'?

If yes, then WHERE and WHAT, EXACTLY?

1. That is your belief.

WHAT do you ASSUME or BELIEVE is my so-called and alleged 'belief' here?

2. A point divided results in further points.

Is 'this' YOUR so-called, and alleged, 'rational claim'?