Yes it is an evaluating FSK to evaluate and compare the credibility, reliability and objectivity of FSKs in generating the emergence and realization of reality, facts, truth, knowledge and objectivity.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 11:33 pmWhich is an FSK. Is it more credible and reliable than science? That was my point.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 4:26 am Why the Scientific FSK is the Most Credible and Reliable
viewtopic.php?f=12&t=39585
And you granted my other point which was popularity does not mean that science is credible and reliable.
Let's say, examinations are established by examiners to evaluate [based on an evaluation FSK-A with criteria] the competence of a group of 50 competitors [say divers in an Olympic competition] [each with their own FSK] and marks upon 100 are given; say competitor with FSK-Y is given the highest rating at 99/100.
Surely it is irrelevant to ask whether FSK-A has higher diving competence than FSK-Y.
Similarly it is irrelevant to ask whether the evaluating FSK has a higher FSK than that of Science and other FSKs competing against Science.
The criteria used in the evaluating-FSK must be self-evident, for example,
the criteria of testability, reproducibility, repeatability is undeniable by any rational person.
If science claimed 'water is H20' in general [no considering isomers], anyone can do the test repeatedly to get the same result all the time.
As such, all the criteria must be self-evident, universal and not easily disputed.
In this case, it is irrelevant to ask whether the evaluating FSK is more credible and reliable than the scientific FSK and other FSK related to the establishment of reality of the universe.