1=0 III

What is the basis for reason? And mathematics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Agent Smith
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Agent Smith »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 9:55 pm
Agent Smith wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 9:50 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 9:46 pm

Isn't it amazing how one can read the same thing over and over again yet never have the same thoughts about it?
Some things are impossible unless

1. Math is amazing
2. President Carter ate hot dog at least once in his life
3. Swig means drink
Touché.
Ouch! G'nite.
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Age »

Agent Smith wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 3:32 am 1 = 0

:|

I wish time travel were real!! The question is in which direction would you wanna go, backwards/forwards, or ... are they the same thing? Phuwaaa!! 😎
WHO CLAIMS that 'it' is NOT real?
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Age »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:14 pm
Age wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 2:10 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 8:13 pm

1. The act of contrast allows for form to occur. The totality is without contrast otherwise something would be beyond it thus it would not be the totality.
I KNOW, 'this' IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN SAYING and WRITING here. Had you REALLY NOT YET NOTICED 'this'?
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 8:13 pm 2. Does whether or not is matters to me matter to you?
That all depends on what the 'it' here IS, EXACTLY?
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 8:13 pm 3. Matter is the space between spaces as evidence by a circle:
LOL
LOL
LOL

If this is what you want to BELIEVE is true, then that is perfectly fine and okay with me.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 8:13 pm There is the space inside the circle, the space outside the circle and the space that is between what is inside and outside the circle (i.e. the circle). If all there is is space then space contradicts itself.
The ABSOLUTE STUPIDITY of this here SPEAKS, LOUD and CLEAR, for ITSELF.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 8:13 pm 4. If you are trying to show us the way then you are trying to convince us of the way.
Is this what you REALLY BELIEVE is true?
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 8:13 pm 5. If all is one, and the one is correct, then misbehaving is part of the one thus is correct as part of being the one.
That 'you', adult human beings, ARE MISBEHAVING IS, OBVIOUSLY, Correct. BUT, MISBEHAVING IS, JUST AS OBVIOUS, NOT THE Correct 'thing' TO DO, in this One and ONLY Life.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 8:13 pm 6. If you are guiding us to find the truth on our own then we are not doing it on our own because you are guiding us.
OBVIOUSLY, one can be guided on HOW TO do some 'thing', AND THEN do 'it' for and/or by "them" 'self' For example, one could be TAUGHT, or GUIDED, on HOW TO FIND 'things' for and by "them" 'self, on their OWN, AND THEN that one COULD THEN go out, on their own, to FIND whatever they have been TAUGHT, or GUIDED ON HOW, TO FIND.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 8:13 pm 7. Why reduce it to a dichotomy of right or wrong when you can just accept things as is?
BUT I AM NOT 'reducing' ANY 'thing' here.

OBVIOUSLY there IS A 'Right' AND A 'Wrong', in Life.

Can you NOT YET SEE this Fact?
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed May 03, 2023 8:13 pm 8. I saw the long response and didn't bother reading...if you need such a long response then you do not know efficiency, thus you do not know everything.
LOL Okay.

ALL 'things' that NEED EXPLAING take DIFFERENT lengths of response. ALL depending on the GUIDER/TEACHER and the LEARNER/STUDENT.

By the way, I KNOW that to EXPLAIN TO 'you', what can be EXPLAINED TO "another" in just three letters, could take a WHOLE lifetime of yours, and WITHOUT 'you' EVER becoming THE WISER
1. If the totality is without form then it is not a thing thus nothing.
BUT WHO WOULD EVER CLAIM that 'totality' is WITHOUT 'form'?

Has absolutely ANY one in this forum CLAIMED such a 'thing' as 'this'?

If yes, then WHO, EXACTLY?
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:14 pm 2. What does 'it' mean to you?
EXACTLY as I SAID BEFORE, that ALL DEPENDS on what the 'it' IS, EXACTLY.

you brought up the 'it' word WITHOUT CLARIFYING what 'it' was in reference TO, EXACTLY. So, that IS WHY I SAID what I did here BEFORE, and have AGAIN, now.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:14 pm 3. Then there is only space and space contradicts itself when form occurs (form is a space between spaces thus space standing apart from itself).
'you' REALLY DO TWIST and DISTORT 'things' AROUND SO MUCH "eodnhoj7", and thus WHY you end up SAYING the MOST STUPID, ABSURD, SELF-CONTRADICTORY and RIDICULOUS 'things', like AGAIN just here now.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:14 pm 4. Do you believe that is the right question to ask?
NO, NOT AT ALL.

As I CONTINUALLY INFORM 'you', people, here. I NEITHER BELIEVE NOR DISBELIEVE ANY 'thing' AT ALL, (except for the One 'thing', which is NOT in the question that you just asked here).
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:14 pm 5. If all is one, and the one is correct, then misbehaving is part of the one and is correct.
If 'the one' is correct, or NOT correct, is, AGAIN, ANOTHER completely and utterly STUPID and NONSENSICAL remark and comment.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:14 pm This necessitates the one contradicts itself and is no longer the one as with contradiction anything goes therefore multiplicity occurs as well.
'This' does NOT necessitate what you say here AT ALL. What the 'this' word refers to IS JUST STUPID and NONSENSICAL to BEGIN WITH. Which, ACTUALLY necessitates TO just MORE ABSURDITY here. As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVED IRREFUTABLY True.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:14 pm 6. If they are following out a path laid before them, i.e. what is taught,
But WHO CLAIMS there WAS SOME 'path laid before them'?

Did you REALLY READ the ACTUAL WORDS that I WROTE and SAID above here?

YOUR WORDS here SEEM TO PROVE you DID NOT.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:14 pm then they are not doing it on there own as the path guides them.
WHAT 'path' are you going on ABOUT here?

I NEVER mentioned ANY 'thing' ABOUT ANY 'path', and, I do NOT recall you ever mentioning the 'path' word prior EITHER.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:14 pm 7. And yet both occur thus leaving us with contradiction.
you USE the 'contradiction' word in A WAY that I have NEVER come across with "ANOTHER" one of 'you' human beings.

How are 'you' DEFINING the 'contradiction' word here "eodnhoj7"?

To me there IS A Right and A Wrong, in Life, just like there IS A left (foot) and A right (foot), but 'these' do NOT leave me with absolutely ANY 'contradiction' AT ALL.

BUT BECAUSE you seem to be USING the word 'contradiction' in some OTHER way, we WILL WAIT to SEE what TRANSPIRES here now.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:14 pm 8. If you are here to learn how to socialize with others then technically I am teaching you
1. I am NOT here to learn how to 'socialize'. I am here to LEARN how to communicate BETTER with 'you', human beings.

2. YES, VERY True 'you', "eodnhoj7", are TEACHING 'me' how to communicate BETTER with 'you', human beings. But NOT necessarily in THE WAY that you might think nor envision.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:14 pm and "what can be EXPLAINED TO "another" in just three letters, could take a WHOLE lifetime of yours, and WITHOUT 'you' EVER becoming THE WISER."
Wow REALLY?

If yes, then what are those three letters, EXACTLY?
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Age »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:15 pm
Agent Smith wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 3:32 am 1 = 0

:|

I wish time travel were real!! The question is in which direction would you wanna go, backwards/forwards, or ... are they the same thing? Phuwaaa!! 😎
If history repeats then is there really a future?
But if history does NOT so-call repeat, then is there REALLY a future or NOT, to 'you', "eodnhoj7"?
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Age »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:51 pm
Agent Smith wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:28 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 8:15 pm

If history repeats then is there really a future?
Gracias Eodnhoj7!

A lightbulb went off in Kimran's pretty head ... cars and graves make an odd couple but given enough rope 6 feet over is the same as 6 feet under, oui?
One mans ascent is another's decent....up and down are the same thing in 0 gravity. If I fall 6 feet I am being raised 6 feet from the sky.
Did you mean 'descent' here?

Because there is, literally, NOT much difference at all, REALLY, from adult human beings being 'in-decent' and in humankind's 'currently' spirally descent'.

By the way one does NOT 'fall' in zero gravity.

'you', human beings, only think 'you fall' BECAUSE of 'your' VERY LIMITED, SHALLOW, and NARROWED view and perspective of 'things'.
User avatar
Agent Smith
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Agent Smith »

Age wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 1:31 am
Agent Smith wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 3:32 am 1 = 0

:|

I wish time travel were real!! The question is in which direction would you wanna go, backwards/forwards, or ... are they the same thing? Phuwaaa!! 😎
WHO CLAIMS that 'it' is NOT real?
Is this room 300A?

No, can't you read?

Ah, humble apologies ma'am.
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Age »

Agent Smith wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 2:07 am
Age wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 1:31 am
Agent Smith wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 3:32 am 1 = 0

:|

I wish time travel were real!! The question is in which direction would you wanna go, backwards/forwards, or ... are they the same thing? Phuwaaa!! 😎
WHO CLAIMS that 'it' is NOT real?
Is this room 300A?

No, can't you read?

Ah, humble apologies ma'am.
Just as I KNEW.
User avatar
Agent Smith
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Agent Smith »

Age wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 9:22 am
Agent Smith wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 2:07 am
Age wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 1:31 am

WHO CLAIMS that 'it' is NOT real?
Is this room 300A?

No, can't you read?

Ah, humble apologies ma'am.
Just as I KNEW.
Just curious, how would you answer your own question mon ami?
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Age »

Agent Smith wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 10:37 am
Age wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 9:22 am
Agent Smith wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 2:07 am

Is this room 300A?

No, can't you read?

Ah, humble apologies ma'am.
Just as I KNEW.
Just curious, how would you answer your own question mon ami?
1. I would NOT make 'that CLAIM' to begin with. So, my own QUESTION would NEVER apply, to me ANSWERING 'it'.

2. Besides 'you' wishing 'time travel was real', which, if inferring that, to you, 'time travel is not real', then I do NOT know of ANY one "else" CLAIMING 'time travel' is NOT real, other than 'you' here "agent smith".
User avatar
Agent Smith
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Agent Smith »

Age wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 11:30 am
Agent Smith wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 10:37 am
Age wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 9:22 am

Just as I KNEW.
Just curious, how would you answer your own question mon ami?
1. I would NOT make 'that CLAIM' to begin with. So, my own QUESTION would NEVER apply, to me ANSWERING 'it'.

2. Besides 'you' wishing 'time travel was real', which, if inferring that, to you, 'time travel is not real', then I do NOT know of ANY one "else" CLAIMING 'time travel' is NOT real, other than 'you' here "agent smith".
Why would you not make the/that claim then?
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Age »

Agent Smith wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 11:39 am
Age wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 11:30 am
Agent Smith wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 10:37 am

Just curious, how would you answer your own question mon ami?
1. I would NOT make 'that CLAIM' to begin with. So, my own QUESTION would NEVER apply, to me ANSWERING 'it'.

2. Besides 'you' wishing 'time travel was real', which, if inferring that, to you, 'time travel is not real', then I do NOT know of ANY one "else" CLAIMING 'time travel' is NOT real, other than 'you' here "agent smith".
Why would you not make the/that claim then?
BECAUSE what was commonly referred to as 'time travel' IS POSSIBLE.
User avatar
Agent Smith
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Agent Smith »

Age wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 12:42 pm
Agent Smith wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 11:39 am
Age wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 11:30 am

1. I would NOT make 'that CLAIM' to begin with. So, my own QUESTION would NEVER apply, to me ANSWERING 'it'.

2. Besides 'you' wishing 'time travel was real', which, if inferring that, to you, 'time travel is not real', then I do NOT know of ANY one "else" CLAIMING 'time travel' is NOT real, other than 'you' here "agent smith".
Why would you not make the/that claim then?
BECAUSE what was commonly referred to as 'time travel' IS POSSIBLE.
There's an appropriate counter for that move, but let's call it a day mon ami. Au revoir.
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Age »

Agent Smith wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 1:29 pm
Age wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 12:42 pm
Agent Smith wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 11:39 am

Why would you not make the/that claim then?
BECAUSE what was commonly referred to as 'time travel' IS POSSIBLE.
There's an appropriate counter for that move, but let's call it a day mon ami. Au revoir.
It appears that the so-called and ALLEGED 'appropriate counter' was, in fact, NOT 'appropriate' AT ALL, and probably NEVER WAS.
User avatar
Agent Smith
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Agent Smith »

Age wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 1:41 pm
Agent Smith wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 1:29 pm
Age wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 12:42 pm

BECAUSE what was commonly referred to as 'time travel' IS POSSIBLE.
There's an appropriate counter for that move, but let's call it a day mon ami. Au revoir.
It appears that the so-called and ALLEGED 'appropriate counter' was, in fact, NOT 'appropriate' AT ALL, and probably NEVER WAS.
Good day Age
Age
Posts: 20043
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: 1=0 III

Post by Age »

Agent Smith wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 1:55 pm
Age wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 1:41 pm
Agent Smith wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 1:29 pm

There's an appropriate counter for that move, but let's call it a day mon ami. Au revoir.
It appears that the so-called and ALLEGED 'appropriate counter' was, in fact, NOT 'appropriate' AT ALL, and probably NEVER WAS.
Good day Age
SO, AT FIRST, you CLAIM, there EXISTS an appropriate counter for MY so-called 'move', but THEN you just WANTED to so-call call 'it' 'a day'. However, you QUICKLY RETURN, and seem to WANT TO START 'the day' ALL OVER AGAIN. BUT with, YET AGAIN, NO ACTUAL 'appropriate' response, considering that we are in a philosophy forum.

By the way, WHY did you bold the 'age' word here?
Post Reply