It's a shame that we have to continually spell it out for veggy tax. You would have thought that a person who seems to be able to read might at least try to engage in the discussion.
They seem to think that is should be all or nothing. If it's not 100% effective (what is?) it must be 0% effective.
It's a shame that we have to continually spell it out for veggy tax. You would have thought that a person who seems to be able to read might at least try to engage in the discussion.
They seem to think that is should be all or nothing. If it's not 100% effective (what is?) it must be 0% effective.
Indeed, and they seem to be responding from a blinkered ideological place of belief rather than allow in items of evidence.
Vaccines normally takes years to develop and test. I wonder how they managed to do it so quickly this time.
From the Mayo Clinic:
Fact: Because there is an urgent need for COVID-19 vaccines and the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) vaccine approval process can take years, the FDA first gave emergency use authorization to COVID-19 vaccines based on less data than is typically required. The data must show that the vaccines are safe and effective before the FDA can give emergency use authorization or approval.
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 08, 2022 10:50 am
Vaccines normally takes years to develop and test. I wonder how they managed to do it so quickly this time.
From the Mayo Clinic:
Fact: Because there is an urgent need for COVID-19 vaccines and the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) vaccine approval process can take years, the FDA first gave emergency use authorization to COVID-19 vaccines based on less data than is typically required. The data must show that the vaccines are safe and effective before the FDA can give emergency use authorization or approval.
Seems a bit self-contradictory...
If Covid was a gain-of-function research project, then they would have had to develop an antidote to correspond with its research.
Maia wrote: ↑Sat Oct 08, 2022 12:12 am
On the contrary, I'm very conscious of my health, and I always form my own judgements.
Then form your opinion about the fourth jab, and make your choice. What's the problem?
Doesn't hurt to discuss it.
And yet, there's little point if your own mind is set. What's to discuss?
However, it seems you have some misgivings about the jab. Why else would you be discussing it? Maybe you want to think about why you do. Sometimes you know something on a visceral level before you figure out exactly what you're intuiting. Maybe you want to listen to that...
Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 08, 2022 10:37 am
Are you now arguing that vaccines have not immunized the modern world from Polio, and that the 99% efficacy of polio vaccines means that 1% don't work, and Polio is still a problem???
Do you not understand how illogical that is?
It's the anti-vaxxers who are arguing that a vaccine has to be 100% effective to be a proper vaccine.
It's a shame that we have to continually spell it out for veggy tax. You would have thought that a person who seems to be able to read might at least try to engage in the discussion.
They seem to think that is should be all or nothing. If it's not 100% effective (what is?) it must be 0% effective.
It's a shame that we have to continually spell it out for veggy tax. You would have thought that a person who seems to be able to read might at least try to engage in the discussion.
They seem to think that is should be all or nothing. If it's not 100% effective (what is?) it must be 0% effective.
Indeed, and they seem to be responding from a blinkered ideological place of belief rather than allow in items of evidence.
Well, they've certainly convinced me (that they're wrong).
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sat Oct 08, 2022 10:50 am
Vaccines normally takes years to develop and test. I wonder how they managed to do it so quickly this time.
From the Mayo Clinic:
Fact: Because there is an urgent need for COVID-19 vaccines and the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) vaccine approval process can take years, the FDA first gave emergency use authorization to COVID-19 vaccines based on less data than is typically required. The data must show that the vaccines are safe and effective before the FDA can give emergency use authorization or approval.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Oct 08, 2022 12:37 am
Then form your opinion about the fourth jab, and make your choice. What's the problem?
Doesn't hurt to discuss it.
And yet, there's little point if your own mind is set. What's to discuss?
However, it seems you have some misgivings about the jab. Why else would you be discussing it? Maybe you want to think about why you do. Sometimes you know something on a visceral level before you figure out exactly what you're intuiting. Maybe you want to listen to that...
