MOSQUITO ANALOGY

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
User avatar
RG1
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 9:49 pm

MOSQUITO ANALOGY

Post by RG1 »

*

MOSQUITO ANALOGY - Part 1

1. Imagine an elderly woman who becomes deathly ill if bitten by a mosquito. Further imagine this woman is alone in a room with 1 mosquito flying about. She is in an unsafe environment; her risk of getting bit by the mosquito (and getting deathly ill) is relatively high.

2. Now imagine a young man who is outside the room (is socially isolated) from this woman. This man, unlike the woman, is not susceptible to the ill effects of a mosquito bite. If a mosquito were to bite him, he would simply just slap and kill the annoying little bugger (permanently removing this pest from the environment; never to bite anyone ever again).

3. So what would happen if this man entered the room with this vulnerable woman, with this mosquito flying about?
…would the woman be safer if this man shared the same environment as her?,
…or would she be less safe?,
…or would there be no change to her risk of being bitten by the mosquito?

ANSWER: The logical (mathematical/statistical) answer is that she would be TWICE AS SAFE because he would be sharing a proportionate amount of the risk. The odds and risk of her getting bit will have instantly reduced in half!

***********

MOSQUITO ANALOGY - Part 2


4. So now imagine that this same man then takes off most of his clothes, thereby exposing 10X more skin area (than the woman) to this killer mosquito.

5. So now what happens to the safety of this vulnerable woman?
…does this (un-clothed man) further reduce her risk of being bitten by the mosquito?
…or does it increase her risk?
…or does it not have any effect?

ANSWER:
The logical (mathematical/statistical) answer is that she would be TEN TIMES MORE SAFE because he is now taking on a disproportionate share of the risk. The odds/risk of her getting bit have now instantly reduced 10 fold!

**********

MORAL-OF-THE-STORY:
Anyone that advises (or mandates) that we socially isolate and clothe our healthy immune population is LOGICALLY IGNORANT -- doing so greatly INCREASES THE DEATHS to our vulnerable population, and PERPETUATES the further mutations of these killer mosquitos.

***********

MORE SCARY THOUGHTS:


6. Now imagine if every time that a vulnerable person was bitten by a mosquito, mosquito eggs were planted under the skin, and within days, the eggs would hatch and more mosquitos would then fly out into the environment, making our contaminated environment even more contaminated. The more vulnerable one is (i.e. the weaker one's immune system), the larger the number of mosquitos that can be bred and replicated back out into the environment.

7. Now imagine each and every replication cycle yields the potential of mutation (via natural law's "survival of the fittest"), whereas these new mutation iterations now develop deadlier and more contagious breeds of mosquitoes.

8. Now imagine a vaccine is created to protect against the latest mutation of mosquitos, but people foolishly continue to socially isolate and stay clothed. So what happens?

ANSWER: Logically, the vaccine would be rendered useless (non-effective) because 1) it is logically impossible to develop vaccines at a faster rate than new mutations are developing (i.e. we can only get deeper in the hole!), and 2) any gains made by the vaccine would be more than erased by the damage done by the continued social isolation and clothing mandates.

Logically, if we want to stop these deadly mosquitos once-and-for-all, then, more importantly than vaccinations, we must allow healthy people to freely socialize un-clothed, or else the mosquitos will ultimately win the battle of "survival-of-the-fittest".

*************

CONCLUSION: If we wish to save ourselves, then we need to "Follow the LOGIC" ...not the Bad Science (the science that disregards logic).
User avatar
Sculptor
Posts: 8779
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2019 11:32 pm

Re: MOSQUITO ANALOGY

Post by Sculptor »

RG1 wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 10:23 pm *

MOSQUITO ANALOGY - Part 1

1. Imagine an elderly woman who becomes deathly ill if bitten by a mosquito. Further imagine this woman is alone in a room with 1 mosquito flying about. She is in an unsafe environment; her risk of getting bit by the mosquito (and getting deathly ill) is relatively high.

2. Now imagine a young man who is outside the room (is socially isolated) from this woman. This man, unlike the woman, is not susceptible to the ill effects of a mosquito bite. If a mosquito were to bite him, he would simply just slap and kill the annoying little bugger (permanently removing this pest from the environment; never to bite anyone ever again).

3. So what would happen if this man entered the room with this vulnerable woman, with this mosquito flying about?
…would the woman be safer if this man shared the same environment as her?,
…or would she be less safe?,
…or would there be no change to her risk of being bitten by the mosquito?

ANSWER: The logical (mathematical/statistical) answer is that she would be TWICE AS SAFE because he would be sharing a proportionate amount of the risk. The odds and risk of her getting bit will have instantly reduced in half!
Why ask a question only to answer it falsely.
You might need to say why he is socially isolated. Could he give her COVID?
As she has some chance of killing the mossy herslef; as the mossy might strike twice; then your maths is poorly conceived.

***********

MOSQUITO ANALOGY - Part 2


4. So now imagine that this same man then takes off most of his clothes, thereby exposing 10X more skin area (than the woman) to this killer mosquito.

5. So now what happens to the safety of this vulnerable woman?
…does this (un-clothed man) further reduce her risk of being bitten by the mosquito?
…or does it increase her risk?
…or does it not have any effect?

ANSWER:
The logical (mathematical/statistical) answer is that she would be TEN TIMES MORE SAFE because he is now taking on a disproportionate share of the risk. The odds/risk of her getting bit have now instantly reduced 10 fold!
Once again your simplisitic view of life renders bogus numbers.

**********

MORAL-OF-THE-STORY:
Anyone that advises (or mandates) that we socially isolate and clothe our healthy immune population is LOGICALLY IGNORANT -- doing so greatly INCREASES THE DEATHS to our vulnerable population, and PERPETUATES the further mutations of these killer mosquitos.
Your are very confused about the whole issue of the pandemic and have been since the start.
The virus is nothing like the mossy.
When the boy opens the door he brings with him a swarm of mosquitos.
Try and use your brain!
***********

MORE SCARY THOUGHTS:

Imagine....
Imagine if you used common sense and reason!!!
Impenitent
Posts: 4391
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: MOSQUITO ANALOGY

Post by Impenitent »

kill the blood suckers?

-Imp
simplicity
Posts: 750
Joined: Thu May 20, 2021 5:23 pm

Re: MOSQUITO ANALOGY

Post by simplicity »

One of the morals of the pandemic is that the politicization of anything renders it completely dys-functional.
Post Reply