Dontaskme wrote: ↑Thu Nov 25, 2021 8:09 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Nov 25, 2021 7:53 pm
And how do the passports help?
...the passports help, by denying access to these two sometimes deadly viruses,
Apparently not.
People with vaccine passports are infectious. So are people without vaccine passports. So the passport does not tell us whether or not the bearer is a danger to others, because
everybody apparently is a danger of infecting others.
So what, exactly, does a vaccine passport do?
to enter into another country.
This has nothing to do with "vaccine passports." You're only thinking of international passports, which are a very different document and concept.
Vaccine "passports" are not real passports at all. They're not international, and not for borders. They are pieces of paper that tell, say, restaurant owners or organizers of sporting events whether or not you've been jabbed, when, and how many times, and they're used to let you in and out of events and service in your own home town. Of course, at some time in the future, they may also be demanded for international travel, but that's not what they're really for.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/ ... -passport/
So do you want to have to show your medical records in order to go to a restaurant or movie, or to get into your bank? That's what a "vaccine passport" means. Or, if you're a vaxxer, do you want people who are infectious to congregate? Because that's what the "pass" gives you a "pass" to do.
So whether you're vax or anti-vax, what makes the "vaccine passport" a good idea? It looks bad from both directions. And it's certainly an incursion on your personal freedom, and plausibly, according to Social Justice theory, a systemically racist procedure.