onglob wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 11:49 pm
But there is no relativity between the dimensions of a 3D space , so I postulated that in a 4D space the relativity of space (with 3 dimensions) and time (the 4th dimension) should be broken .
There indeed is 'no relativity between the dimensions of a 3D space'.
Here are a few more examples of the FTL empirical observations:
-
Galaxy Cluster Spawns Stars Faster Than Any In Known Universe
-
Cartwheel Galaxy Makes Waves In New NASA Image
“If the equation for a universal law of physics cannot explain reality with its mathematical construct, it is not the reality is incorrect.” - Source to be known
A well-conceived '4D space in the relativity of space (with 3 dimensions) and time (the 4th dimension)', could resolve the FTL anomaly, in which the anomaly was explained with your example.
Nonetheless, it might not be the relativistic transformation of the 4D space that causes the anomaly of the FTL in the 3D world.
We could be living in an aetheric 4D structure of the cosmos in the 3D world.
BTW, the Higgs field is an all-pervasive aetheric field.
"My opinion about Miller's experiments is the following. ... Should the positive result be confirmed, then the special theory of relativity and with it the general theory of relativity, in its current form, would be invalid. Experimentum summus judex. Only the equivalence of inertia and gravitation would remain, however, they would have to lead to a significantly different theory." - Albert Einstein, in a letter to Edwin E. Slosson, July 1925
If you could grasp this, you would be able to unify relativity with quantum mechanics in the paradigm shift to an aetheric worldview; the reified 4D space would still not reconcile with quantum mechanics.
onglob wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 11:49 pm
I agree that we should not go too far in imagination and our imaginations should be consistent with our current knowledge . But when the answers to some questions - or explanation to some new observations - goes beyond the realm of our knowledge, and not very remote to that realm , imaginations for the answers of those questions may stimulate progress and give birth to evolution of our science .
You should not be afraid of going too far for working up your imagination to the state of vision all the way as much as you could.
“Work up imagination to the state of vision.” - William Blake
Nonetheless, it is essential to distinguish myths from facts.
And it is important to note the 'current knowledge" you mentioned, is merely the subjective knowledge for its pragmatic theory of truth, which is not tantamount to the objective knowledge.
Any hypothesis extrapolated from a foundation that was based on an incorrect paradigm of reality would be fallacious at its best, this is despite its valid conclusions deduced in its abstract can be analytically true, and can also pragmatically work. Nonetheless, a fallaciously postulated paradigm of the cosmos, would inevitably flop under the
law of noncontradiction in its
epistemic theory of truth.
The 'current knowledge" as proposed with the mainstream modern physics in its paradigm of the cosmos, flopped on every aspect when scrutinized under the law of noncontradiction when referred to reality.