Page 1 of 1
solving philosophy part 2 (semantics)
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2020 2:59 pm
by Advocate
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... =622235762
That document answers more philosophical questions (logically, cohesively, consistently, etc.) than any philosophy book ever written. Care to test the contention?
Re: solving philosophy part 2 (semantics)
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:33 pm
by Greylorn Ell
The referenced document could be the worst garbage I've read on any so-called philosophy forum.
It fails to address the beginnings of that which we know to exist.
GL
Re: solving philosophy part 2 (semantics)
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:43 pm
by Advocate
[quote="Greylorn Ell" post_id=473508 time=1601314400 user_id=9668]
The referenced document could be the worst garbage I've read on any so-called philosophy forum.
It fails to address the beginnings of that which we know to exist.
GL
[/quote]
neither does Winnie-the-Pooh address economics
Re: solving philosophy part 2 (semantics)
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2020 10:17 am
by PeteJ
Does this spreadsheet have some purpose?
If so, what?
Re: solving philosophy part 2 (semantics)
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2020 2:31 pm
by Advocate
[quote=PeteJ post_id=474875 time=1602235031 user_id=11479]
Does this spreadsheet have some purpose?
If so, what?
[/quote]
Take your favourite philosophy problem, apply those understandings to any relevant terms, and poof, it will solve itself. To the extent it's bound within the understandings the doc touches on, which is most of philosophy i'd think.