Cerveny wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2023 11:56 am
Cerveny wrote: ↑Mon Dec 11, 2023 8:36 am
Please forgive me, Albert Einstein fans, but I'm afraid that by promoting the idea of infinitely fine physical space mathematical genius paralyzed physics for a hundred years and gave birth to some really crazy theories, sorry…
1) For example, how can a reasonable person seriously works with the idea that a single dimensionless point can give birth to / contains the entire universe (BB) or matter at all (BH)?
BUT ALL so-called 'reasonable people' can STILL have or hold some COMPLETELY UNREASONABLE ideas, like 'this one' you just expressed here.
But A 'big bang' could STILL have occurred, from some sized 'point' of infinitely compressed matter, which contained the ENTIRE physical part of the Universe. There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING UNREASONABLE ABOUT 'this'.
Cerveny wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2023 11:56 am
Consider please that the matter did not appear in "BB".
OBVIOUSLY 'matter' WAS existing BEFORE ANY so-called 'big bang' HAPPENED and OCCURRED, and existing ETERNALLY I will add.
Cerveny wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2023 11:56 am
Only the
time / the process of “organizing” matter / the
causality was born in "BB".
'This' is NOT necessarily True, AT ALL.
'This' is ONLY what 'you' PRESUME and/or BELIEVE is true.
Cerveny wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2023 11:56 am
The first seed / germ / tiny crystal / DNA of causality (of physical space) began the crysralisation, the growth of the Universe / of the past (inside the dimensionless, timeless divine Future). The first "word" was spoken, first dice / brick has been formed and laid. God doesn't play (Planck’s:) dice, God builds them…
Who and/or what IS 'God', EXACTLY?
Cerveny wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2023 11:56 am
Before "BB" there was only the divine eternal Future.
So, TO 'you', there WAS NO 'matter' NOR ANY 'space' BEFORE the so-called 'big bang', right?
Cerveny wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2023 11:56 am
It was the same Future that we face every moment now, in the Present.
WAS/IS there A 'Past' 'now', in the 'Future', and/or BEFORE the 'big bang', TO 'you'?