All Arguments are Authoritative

[Eodnhoj7]

All arguments, as extensions of the observer, are authoritative by their assertive nature. The projection of an angle of awareness necessitates the argument's authority in the respect the observer is the origin point of the assertion presented.

The assertion is thus a projection of a singular point of awareness which encapsulates the subjective angle of the observer and manifests it as an objective entity. The authoritative nature of the argument is thus grounded in the authority of the subjective angle as a particular means of expressing one degree of a multifaceted phenomenon.

[TheVisionofEr]

When the thing said or "argument" is accepted spontaneously from a independant experience it is distinguishable from relying on what someone we regard as trustworthy atests to.

Otherwise, I agree. But, your way seems to make authority a word for the uniqness of all observations. And the corrisponding impossibility of knowledge of all perspectives at any given moment.

[Eodnhoj7]

When the thing said or "argument" is accepted spontaneously from a independant experience it is distinguishable from relying on what someone we regard as trustworthy atests to.

Otherwise, I agree. But, your way seems to make authority a word for the uniqness of all observations. And the corrisponding impossibility of knowledge of all perspectives at any given moment.

Authority is individuation of assertion as a particular angle of awareness where the angulature of the percieved phenomenon acts as a singular reference point that reflects an apex in understanding. This authority, through angulature, references the multi-grade nature of any given assertion thus necessitating truth as multidimensional with multiple authorities of any subject as approximations of one single subject.

The subject alone necessitates it as one unique, hence authoritative, nature which grounds itself as one authority existing through many. The question of authority, as a question of individuation, necessitates assertion as "existence alone" where the said authority derives its own nature by existence.

Existence is authority and existence is multidimensional thus deriving the nature of individuation as one meaning superimposed through many meanings. Authority thus represents itself through grades where the highest authority is that which is closest to the center point of many meanings.

[TheVisionofEr]

When the thing said or "argument" is accepted spontaneously from a independant experience it is distinguishable from relying on what someone we regard as trustworthy atests to.

Otherwise, I agree. But, your way seems to make authority a word for the uniqness of all observations. And the corrisponding impossibility of knowledge of all perspectives at any given moment.

Authority is individuation of assertion as a particular angle of awareness where the angulature of the percieved phenomenon acts as a singular reference point that reflects an apex in understanding. This authority, through angulature, references the multi-grade nature of any given assertion thus necessitating truth as multidimensional with multiple authorities of any subject as approximations of one single subject.

The subject alone necessitates it as one unique, hence authoritative, nature which grounds itself as one authority existing through many. The question of authority, as a question of individuation, necessitates assertion as "existence alone" where the said authority derives its own nature by existence.

Existence is authority and existence is multidimensional thus deriving the nature of individuation as one meaning superimposed through many meanings. Authority thus represents itself through grades where the highest authority is that which is closest to the center point of many meanings.

And yet, one is prone to think that the many beings must be in some sense related to one place where each unique being happens.

[Eodnhoj7]

When the thing said or "argument" is accepted spontaneously from a independant experience it is distinguishable from relying on what someone we regard as trustworthy atests to.

Otherwise, I agree. But, your way seems to make authority a word for the uniqness of all observations. And the corrisponding impossibility of knowledge of all perspectives at any given moment.

Authority is individuation of assertion as a particular angle of awareness where the angulature of the percieved phenomenon acts as a singular reference point that reflects an apex in understanding. This authority, through angulature, references the multi-grade nature of any given assertion thus necessitating truth as multidimensional with multiple authorities of any subject as approximations of one single subject.

The subject alone necessitates it as one unique, hence authoritative, nature which grounds itself as one authority existing through many. The question of authority, as a question of individuation, necessitates assertion as "existence alone" where the said authority derives its own nature by existence.

Existence is authority and existence is multidimensional thus deriving the nature of individuation as one meaning superimposed through many meanings. Authority thus represents itself through grades where the highest authority is that which is closest to the center point of many meanings.

And yet, one is prone to think that the many beings must be in some sense related to one place where each unique being happens.

"Authority thus represents itself through grades where the highest authority is that which is closest to the center point of many meanings."