HOW is SAYING, 'Following a 'program' of ONE meal per day, low carbs', NOT SAYING 'you don't need to eat LESS'?vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 12:58 amNo. He's saying you don't need to eat less.Age wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 12:46 amLOL 'we' have ALL been trying that. REALLY "sculptor"? LOL How MANY is 'we' ALL, ACTUALLY?
And, so you WROTE that you ATE LESS, and 'this' WORKED FOR 'you', BUT when I SAY 'EAT LESS' 'you' THEN SAY 'this' will NOT work.
Also, for absolutely ANY one who WANTS TO SAY or WRITE, 'No, eating less and moving more will NOT work in losing weight', then PLEASE EXPLAIN to the rest of us HOW, EXACTLY, a human body COULD put on MORE WEIGHT WHEN 'it' IS putting LESS FOOD INTO 'it', AND, MOVING AROUND MORE, thus BURNING MORE FAT AND MORE CALORIES OF the LESS AMOUNT being put INTO the body.
Do you think, or is "sculptor", SAYING that 'it' was eating LESS than ONE meal a day, beforehand?
Or, SAYING that "sculptor" had ALREADY been ONLY eating ONE meal per day, but 'now' just eats LESS or LOW carbs.
Can 'you', people, REALLY NOT YET SEE that it IS BECAUSE of eating LESS what ACTUALLY ALSO HELPED in 'this one' LOSING WEIGHT?
I AGREE.
But ALSO, and to me anyway, eating LESS of WHAT one eats WILL ALSO, OBVIOUSLY, HELP in LOSING WEIGHT.
Which INVOLVES eating LESS what is sometimes referred to as RUBBISH.
Yes, AGAIN, I AGREE and IS EXACTLY what I AM SAYING. That is; MOVE, MORE.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 12:58 am MORE metabolism-boosting exercise i.e. brisk walking. It works.
Maybe I HAD TO BE MORE SPECIFIC.
Eat LESS what is called 'rubbish' food, which could and would ALLOW one TO eat MORE of 'good' food, AND, MOVE MORE one could NOT BUT LOSE WEIGHT. 'This' is OF COURSE if one does NOT eat to much MORE 'good' food to OVERRIDE the BENEFIT of NOT eating the 'rubbish' food, than they were BEFORE.