I told you before. I am telling you again. The fact that you can't tell the difference between what I say and What JohnDoe7 says is precisely your problem. And evidence for the fact that what I say, does, in fact happen.-1- wrote: ↑Mon Apr 01, 2019 11:47 am What you described, Logik, does not happen. You are cherry-picking not facts, but your own obsessive imagination. You are more lucid than JohnDoe7, but essentially you do the same: you believe your own phantasms that you freely quote on the pages of these forums as if they were standard, accepted knowledge.
Whereas they are not. They are easily refutable bullshit.
It's happening right now.
You don't understand my jargon because it's not in a dictionary and you can't be bothered to read the references I keep providing. You are claiming that I am talking bullshit, when it is in fact accepted knowledge by millions of computer scientists, physicists, mathematicians, logicians, statisticians, economists, engineers etc. It not accepted by the general population, but that's the general population's problem. In 100 years that which I say may will be "common sense" - who knows?
You can't understand what I am saying because you lack the background knowledge to understand my words.
This is exactly the phenomenon described here: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HLqWn5L ... -distances
That is how easy it is to end up on the wrong side. That is how trivial it is to fool yourself.
Yet there you are. Unable to distinguish signal from noise, so you are playing it safe. You paint me with the same brush as JohnDoe7.
Rather safe than sorry. Which is precisely what every Sophist does when they run out of technical depth. Can't think for yourself, so you'd rather go with that which is "commonly accepted" eh ?
Say "baaaaaa!"
