Awww, well please point out just 1 well documented thing that he says.Greta wrote:It must be hard to squeeze that in between all the window cleaningGinkgo wrote:You idiot, what do you think someone like me does for a living? I teach philosophy and science.HexHammer wrote:That would explain your skill of reasoning.
I'm happy to have a Hex-free chat about Chalmers. HH's views about DC are well enough documented.
The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
I don't doubt that you think that. If only that had some value beyond what it is.HexHammer wrote:I think I've PLENTY of times proved that you have no deeper understanding of anything and I have superior understanding! You like most other people here can only do parrot speeches!Terrapin Station wrote:At any rate the reason I said this is simply that it's clear as day from comments you've made. You have no understanding of what the conventional definition of circularity is.
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
Needest I say you were dead wrong in "irreducible complexity" ..shall I go on?Terrapin Station wrote:I don't doubt that you think that. If only that had some value beyond what it is.
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
No, YOUR views are well enough documented. Sheesh.HexHammer wrote:Awww, well please point out just 1 well documented thing that he says.Greta wrote:It must be hard to squeeze that in between all the window cleaningGinkgo wrote:
You idiot, what do you think someone like me does for a living? I teach philosophy and science.
I'm happy to have a Hex-free chat about Chalmers. HH's views about DC are well enough documented.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
As if I'd ever used that phrase or said anything about that. In that discussion, I simply asked you this: "You'd say there aren't elementary particles in the (current) standard model?"HexHammer wrote:Needest I say you were dead wrong in "irreducible complexity" ..shall I go on?Terrapin Station wrote:I don't doubt that you think that. If only that had some value beyond what it is.
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
Liar!Terrapin Station wrote:As if I'd ever used that phrase or said anything about that. In that discussion, I simply asked you this: "You'd say there aren't elementary particles in the (current) standard model?"
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
So you weren't sarcastic, hmmm thanks!Greta wrote:No, YOUR views are well enough documented. Sheesh.HexHammer wrote:Awww, well please point out just 1 well documented thing that he says.Greta wrote: It must be hard to squeeze that in between all the window cleaning
I'm happy to have a Hex-free chat about Chalmers. HH's views about DC are well enough documented.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
Well, you're welcome to quote me otherwise.HexHammer wrote:Liar!Terrapin Station wrote:As if I'd ever used that phrase or said anything about that. In that discussion, I simply asked you this: "You'd say there aren't elementary particles in the (current) standard model?"
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
Should we declare this thread officially dead?
It seems we are not allowed to have a civilised chat about Chalmers.
It seems we are not allowed to have a civilised chat about Chalmers.
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
What a load of BS. Higher wages have nothing to do with intelligence. BTW your grammar is appalling.HexHammer wrote:So does many people, and can only make parrot speeches, not really think critically and abstract which those who earn more money typically can, as their reasoning skills typically are higher.
Last edited by Ginkgo on Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
You opinion in this thread has been nothing but nonsense and babble. I gave you the correct answer.HexHammer wrote:True enough but it was imo a poor answer.Ginkgo wrote:You asked a question and I provided the answer.
Last edited by Ginkgo on Wed Dec 14, 2016 3:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
The "hard" and "easy'' problems of consciousness.HexHammer wrote:Awww, well please point out just 1 well documented thing that he says.
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
And how do you know? You who haven't tried to sign a million dollar contract.Ginkgo wrote:What a load of BS. Higher wages have nothing to do with intelligence. BTW your grammar is appalling.HexHammer wrote:So does many people, and can only make parrot speeches, not really think critically and abstract which those who earn more money typically can, as their reasoning skills typically are higher.
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
No, you don't have the mental aptitude to understand what the correct answer is.Ginkgo wrote:You opinion in this thread has been nothing but nonsense and babble. I gave you the correct answer.HexHammer wrote:True enough but it was imo a poor answer.Ginkgo wrote:You asked a question and I provided the answer.
Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers
This explains exactly nothing, and only shows how easily manipulated you are.Ginkgo wrote:The "hard" and "easy'' problems of consciousness.HexHammer wrote:Awww, well please point out just 1 well documented thing that he says.