Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 9:30 pm
It is not intelligent at all.
It has no idea what it is saying. It has no understanding.
Me: This was written about Chat GPT LLS:
"It is not intelligent at all.
It has no idea what it is saying. It has no understanding."
What has GPT to say about the statement? Is it ture of false?
GPT: GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) models, including ChatGPT, are designed to generate human-like text based on the input they receive. While they can generate coherent and contextually relevant responses, it's important to note that they don't possess true understanding or intelligence.
GPT models operate by predicting the next word in a sequence of text based on the context of the preceding words. They don't have a deep comprehension of the information they process, and their responses are generated based on patterns learned during training on a diverse range of internet text.
So, the statement is partially true in the sense that GPT models lack true understanding and intelligence. They can produce contextually appropriate responses, but this is based on patterns learned from data rather than a genuine comprehension of the meaning behind the words.
Me: Why is the statement "partially true" rather than totally?
GPT: The statement is considered partially true because while GPT models like ChatGPT are indeed not truly intelligent in the way humans are, and they lack genuine understanding of the information, they can still generate text that appears coherent and contextually relevant.
GPT models are trained on vast amounts of diverse data and can capture patterns in language, allowing them to produce responses that are contextually appropriate and syntactically correct. However, this is a result of statistical associations and patterns rather than a deep comprehension of the meaning of the text.
In essence, GPT models exhibit a form of artificial intelligence in their ability to generate human-like text, but they do not possess true understanding or consciousness. The "partial" truth lies in acknowledging their ability to mimic intelligence in specific tasks while recognizing the limitations in terms of genuine comprehension and awareness.
Me. So the statement is considered "partially true" by those who are able to consider...it is not GPT which is doing the considering about itself. GPT is simply reflecting back in type, that it is the human input which "does the considering".
GPT: Exactly. The consideration and interpretation of statements are performed by individuals, not by the GPT model itself. GPT generates responses based on patterns learned from data, but it doesn't have the ability to independently evaluate or reflect on its own capabilities. When people say that the statement is "partially true," they are providing an assessment based on their understanding of the limitations and capabilities of GPT models. The model itself doesn't engage in self-awareness, reasoning, or assessment of statements about its own abilities. It is a tool created by humans and operates based on the data it was trained on.